» Articles » PMID: 35085305

Outcomes of Patients Presenting with Elevated Tumor Marker Levels but Negative Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced Liver MRI After a Complete Response to Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2022 Jan 27
PMID 35085305
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients usually achieve a complete response after treatment. This study was aimed to assess the clinical outcome of HCC patients who had achieved a complete response but later presented with elevated tumor marker levels without an identifiable recurrent tumor on gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical outcome of 58 HCC treated patients who had achieved a complete response but later was referred to our institution's multidisciplinary tumor board for a clinically suspected hidden HCC recurrence based on elevated tumor marker levels but negative gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. The imaging studies, tumor markers, and clinical information were reviewed. The total follow-up period was at least 15 months after the initial negative gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.

Results: Follow-up imaging studies detected an HCC lesion in 89.7% (n = 52/58) of the patients within the study period, and approximately half of the tumors (46.2%, n = 24/52) developed within 3 months. The most frequent site of recurrence was the liver (86.5%; n = 45/52), but extra-hepatic metastasis was also common (19.2%; n = 10/52). In 5.8% (n = 3/52), HCC reoccurred in the combined form of intra-hepatic and extra-hepatic recurrence. Extra-hepatic metastasis alone occurred in 13.5% (n = 7/52) of patients.

Conclusions: HCC frequently recurred within a short interval in patients who achieved a complete response to treatment in the presence of increased tumor marker levels, even if gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI was negative. Under such circumstances, we suggest a short-term follow-up including, but not limited to, gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI along with systemic evaluation.

Citing Articles

Radiological findings in non-surgical recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: From locoregional treatments to immunotherapy.

Ippolito D, Maino C, Gatti M, Marra P, Faletti R, Cortese F World J Gastroenterol. 2023; 29(11):1669-1684.

PMID: 37077517 PMC: 10107213. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i11.1669.

References
1.
Kim B, Hayashi P, Kim S, Angthong W, Srirattanapong S, Woosley J . Outcomes of patients with elevated α-fetoprotein level and initial negative findings at MR imaging. Radiology. 2013; 268(1):109-19. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13121314. View

2.
. 2018 Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Gut Liver. 2019; 13(3):227-299. PMC: 6529163. DOI: 10.5009/gnl19024. View

3.
Marrero J, Kulik L, Sirlin C, Zhu A, Finn R, Abecassis M . Diagnosis, Staging, and Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: 2018 Practice Guidance by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology. 2018; 68(2):723-750. DOI: 10.1002/hep.29913. View

4.
Sinn D, Choi G, Park H, Kim J, Kim H, Song K . Multidisciplinary approach is associated with improved survival of hepatocellular carcinoma patients. PLoS One. 2019; 14(1):e0210730. PMC: 6331107. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210730. View

5.
Kim D, Paik Y, Ahn S, Youn Y, Choi J, Kim J . PIVKA-II is a useful tumor marker for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after surgical resection. Oncology. 2007; 72 Suppl 1:52-7. DOI: 10.1159/000111707. View