» Articles » PMID: 35079608

Family Care and Subjective Well-being of Coronary Heart Disease Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Mediating Effects of Coping Strategies

Overview
Journal Int J Nurs Sci
Specialty Nursing
Date 2022 Jan 26
PMID 35079608
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To analyze the correlations between family care, coping strategies and the subject well-being (SWB) of patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods: From November 2019 to October 2020, 264 CHD patients who had undergone PCI were enrolled in this questionnaire survey. The research tools applied included General Information Questionnaire, the Adaptation, Partnership, Growth, Affection and Resolve, Medical Coping Modes Questionnaire, and the General Well-being Schedule. SPSS 24.0 and Amos 23.0 software packages were used for statistical analysis.

Results: The mean scores for family care, confrontation, avoidance, acceptance-resignation and SWB, were 7.59 ± 2.24, 20.03 ± 3.78, 16.49 ± 2.70, 10.42 ± 2.01, and 73.31 ± 11.63, respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that the path coefficient between family care and subjective well-being was higher in males than females. Family care was directly related to coping strategies. The coping strategies were directly related to SWB, while family care showed an indirect association with SWB via coping strategies.

Conclusions: Family care can improve CHD patients' SWB post-PCI, and coping strategies are important for the link between family care and SWB. Also, men received more family care than women. Based on a patient's characteristics, healthcare providers can promote patients' positive coping strategies, increase their perceived family care, and improve the patient's SWB.

Citing Articles

Self-Care Practices and Perspectives in Managing Coronary Heart Disease Patients: A Qualitative Study.

Setyowati S, Wahyuni A, Adriantoro H, Junus K, Umar E, Fauk N Nurs Rep. 2024; 14(4):3264-3279.

PMID: 39585128 PMC: 11587416. DOI: 10.3390/nursrep14040237.


Impact of specialized nursing outpatient case management on post-coronary artery bypass grafting patients.

Li T, Lu F, Zhao Q World J Clin Cases. 2024; 12(17):3035-3044.

PMID: 38898858 PMC: 11185361. DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i17.3035.


Family functioning and health-related quality of life of inpatients with coronary heart disease: a cross-sectional study in Lanzhou city, China.

Zhang H, Wang Y, Cai X, Tang N, Wei S, Yang Y BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022; 22(1):397.

PMID: 36068504 PMC: 9446873. DOI: 10.1186/s12872-022-02844-x.


Correlation Analysis Between Required Surgical Indexes and Complications in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease.

Tao M, Yao X, Sun S, Qin Y, Li D, Wu J Front Surg. 2022; 9:948666.

PMID: 35874136 PMC: 9299069. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.948666.

References
1.
Deng J, Hu J, Wu W, Dong B, Wu H . Subjective well-being, social support, and age-related functioning among the very old in China. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009; 25(7):697-703. DOI: 10.1002/gps.2410. View

2.
Svensson T, Inoue M, Sawada N, Charvat H, Iwasaki M, Sasazuki S . Coping strategies and cancer incidence and mortality: The Japan Public Health Center-based prospective study. Cancer Epidemiol. 2016; 40:126-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2015.12.003. View

3.
Dieperink K, Coyne E, Creedy D, Ostergaard B . Family functioning and perceived support from nurses during cancer treatment among Danish and Australian patients and their families. J Clin Nurs. 2017; 27(1-2):e154-e161. DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13894. View

4.
Gao L, Moodie M, Chen G . Measuring subjective wellbeing in patients with heart disease: relationship and comparison between health-related quality of life instruments. Qual Life Res. 2019; 28(4):1017-1028. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-018-2094-y. View

5.
Wu X, Qin H, Zhang J, Zheng M, Xin M, Liu L . The prevalence and correlates of symptom distress and quality of life in Chinese oesophageal cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy after radical oesophagectomy. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2015; 19(5):502-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2015.02.010. View