» Articles » PMID: 35078413

Utility of Blood As the Clinical Specimen for the Diagnosis of Ocular Toxoplasmosis Using Uracil DNA Glycosylase-supplemented Loop-mediated Isothermal Amplification and Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction Assays Based on REP-529 Sequence and B1 Gene

Abstract

Background: Ocular infection with Toxoplasma gondii is a major preventable cause of blindness, especially in young people. The aim of the present study was to assess detection rate of T. gondii DNA in blood samples of clinically diagnosed of ocular toxoplasmosis using uracil DNA glycosylase-supplemented loop-mediated isothermal amplification (UDG-LAMP) and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) based on REP-529 and B1.

Methods: One hundred and seventeen patients with clinically diagnosed ocular toxoplasmosis (OT) were participated in the study as well as 200 control patients. Peripheral blood samples were assessed using UDG-LAMP and qPCR techniques targeting REP-529 and B1.

Results: Detection limits of qPCR using REP-529 and B1 were estimated as 0.1 and 1 fg of T. gondii genomic DNA, respectively. The limits of detection for UDG-LAMP using REP-529 and B1 were 1 and 100 fg, respectively. In this study, 18 and 16 patients were positive in qPCR using REP-529 and B1, respectively. Based on the results of UDG-LAMP, 15 and 14 patients were positive using REP-529 and B1, respectively. Results of the study on patients with active ocular lesion showed that sensitivity of REP-529 and BI targets included 64 and 63%, respectively using qPCR. Sensitivity of 62 and 61%, were concluded from UDG-LAMP using REP-529 and B1 in the blood cases of active ocular lesion. qPCR was more sensitive than UDG-LAMP for the detection of Toxoplasma gondii DNA in peripheral blood samples of patients with clinically diagnosed toxoplasmic chorioretinitis. Furthermore, the REP-529 included a better detection rate for the diagnosis of ocular toxoplasmosis in blood samples, compared to that the B1 gene did. Moreover, the qPCR and UDG-LAMP specificity assessments have demonstrated no amplifications of DNAs extracted from other microorganisms based on REP-529 and B1.

Conclusions: Data from the current study suggest that qPCR and UDG-LAMP based on the REP-529 are promising diagnostic methods for the diagnosis of ocular toxoplasmosis in blood samples of patients with active chorioretinal lesions.

Citing Articles

Comparative evaluation of funduscopy, PCR and serology in the diagnosis of ocular toxoplasmosis at ECWA Eye Hospital, Kano.

Adebakin B, Atima M, Idakwo U, Bala J, Abdullahi A, Muhammad A BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2025; 10(1).

PMID: 39837789 PMC: 11784108. DOI: 10.1136/bmjophth-2024-002023.


Efficacy of amniotic fluid, blood and urine samples for the diagnosis of toxoplasmosis in pregnant women candidates for amniocentesis using serological and molecular techniques.

Abedian R, Esboei B, Kordi S, Roshan H, Hezarjaribi H, Rahmani Z BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024; 24(1):771.

PMID: 39578753 PMC: 11583409. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06979-x.

References
1.
Park Y, Nam H . Clinical features and treatment of ocular toxoplasmosis. Korean J Parasitol. 2013; 51(4):393-9. PMC: 3770869. DOI: 10.3347/kjp.2013.51.4.393. View

2.
Silveira C, Ferreira R, Muccioli C, Nussenblatt R, Belfort Jr R . Toxoplasmosis transmitted to a newborn from the mother infected 20 years earlier. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003; 136(2):370-1. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(03)00191-0. View

3.
Greigert V, Di Foggia E, Filisetti D, Villard O, Pfaff A, Sauer A . When biology supports clinical diagnosis: review of techniques to diagnose ocular toxoplasmosis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019; 103(7):1008-1012. DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-313884. View

4.
Homan W, Vercammen M, De Braekeleer J, Verschueren H . Identification of a 200- to 300-fold repetitive 529 bp DNA fragment in Toxoplasma gondii, and its use for diagnostic and quantitative PCR. Int J Parasitol. 2000; 30(1):69-75. DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7519(99)00170-8. View

5.
Buchbinder S, Blatz R, Rodloff A . Comparison of real-time PCR detection methods for B1 and P30 genes of Toxoplasma gondii. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2003; 45(4):269-71. DOI: 10.1016/s0732-8893(02)00549-7. View