» Articles » PMID: 35076472

Interdisciplinary Approaches to the Study of Listening Effort in Young Children with Cochlear Implants

Overview
Journal Audiol Res
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Jan 25
PMID 35076472
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Very early bilateral implantation is thought to significantly reduce the attentional effort required to acquire spoken language, and consequently offer a profound improvement in quality of life. Despite the early intervention, however, auditory and communicative outcomes in children with cochlear implants remain poorer than in hearing children. The distorted auditory input via the cochlear implants requires more auditory attention resulting in increased listening effort and fatigue. Listening effort and fatigue may critically affect attention to speech, and in turn language processing, which may help to explain the variation in language and communication abilities. However, measuring attention to speech and listening effort is demanding in infants and very young children. Three objective techniques for measuring listening effort are presented in this paper that may address the challenges of testing very young and/or uncooperative children with cochlear implants: pupillometry, electroencephalography, and functional near-infrared spectroscopy. We review the studies of listening effort that used these techniques in paediatric populations with hearing loss, and discuss potential benefits of the systematic evaluation of listening effort in these populations.

Citing Articles

Individualized post-operative prediction of cochlear implantation outcomes in children with prelingual deafness using functional near-infrared spectroscopy.

Chen Z, Zhao X, Liu H, Wang Y, Zhang Z, Zhang Y Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2024; 9(6):e70035.

PMID: 39539355 PMC: 11558700. DOI: 10.1002/lio2.70035.


Functional near-infrared spectroscopy in pediatric clinical research: Different pathophysiologies and promising clinical applications.

Gallagher A, Wallois F, Obrig H Neurophotonics. 2023; 10(2):023517.

PMID: 36873247 PMC: 9982436. DOI: 10.1117/1.NPh.10.2.023517.

References
1.
Cartocci G, Scorpecci A, Borghini G, Maglione A, Inguscio B, Giannantonio S . EEG rhythms lateralization patterns in children with unilateral hearing loss are different from the patterns of normal hearing controls during speech-in-noise listening. Hear Res. 2019; 379:31-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2019.04.011. View

2.
Winn M, Won J, Moon I . Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization. Ear Hear. 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PMC: 5079775. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000328. View

3.
Cabrera L, Gervain J . Speech perception at birth: The brain encodes fast and slow temporal information. Sci Adv. 2020; 6(30):eaba7830. PMC: 7439442. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aba7830. View

4.
Fallon J, Irvine D, Shepherd R . Cochlear implants and brain plasticity. Hear Res. 2007; 238(1-2):110-7. PMC: 2361156. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2007.08.004. View

5.
Koelewijn T, Zekveld A, Festen J, Kramer S . Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker. Ear Hear. 2011; 33(2):291-300. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182310019. View