» Articles » PMID: 35074166

Three-dimensional Printing of Clinical Scale and Personalized Calcium Phosphate Scaffolds for Alveolar Bone Reconstruction

Overview
Journal Dent Mater
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2022 Jan 25
PMID 35074166
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Alveolar bone defects can be highly variable in their morphology and, as the defect size increases, they become more challenging to treat with currently available therapeutics and biomaterials. This investigation sought to devise a protocol for fabricating customized clinical scale and patient-specific, bioceramic scaffolds for reconstruction of large alveolar bone defects.

Methods: Two types of calcium phosphate (CaP)-based bioceramic scaffolds (alginate/β-TCP and hydroxyapatite/α-TCP, hereafter referred to as hybrid CaP and Osteoink™, respectively) were designed, 3D printed, and their biocompatibility with alveolar bone marrow stem cells and mechanical properties were determined. Following scaffold optimization, a workflow was developed to use cone beam computed tomographic (CBCT) imaging to design and 3D print, defect-specific bioceramic scaffolds for clinical-scale bone defects.

Results: Osteoink™ scaffolds had the highest compressive strength when compared to hybrid CaP with different infill orientation. In cell culture medium, hybrid CaP degradation resulted in decreased pH (6.3) and toxicity to stem cells; however, OsteoInk™ scaffolds maintained a stable pH (7.2) in culture and passed the ISO standard for cytotoxicity. Finally, a clinically feasible laboratory workflow was developed and evaluated using CBCT imaging to engineer customized and defect-specific CaP scaffolds using OsteoInk™. It was determined that printed scaffolds had a high degree of accuracy to fit the respective clinical defects for which they were designed (0.27 mm morphological deviation of printed scaffolds from digital design).

Significance: From patient to patient, large alveolar bone defects are difficult to treat due to high variability in their complex morphologies and architecture. Our findings shows that Osteoink™ is a biocompatible material for 3D printing of clinically acceptable, patient-specific scaffolds with precision-fit for use in alveolar bone reconstructive procedures. Collectively, emerging digital technologies including CBCT imaging, 3D surgical planning, and (bio)printing can be integrated to address this unmet clinical challenge.

Citing Articles

Melt electrowriting of bioglass-laden poly(ε-caprolactone) scaffolds for bone regeneration.

de Carvalho A, Cardoso L, Anselmi C, Dal-Fabbro R, Campos T, Borges A J Mater Chem B. 2025; .

PMID: 39992649 PMC: 11849773. DOI: 10.1039/d4tb02835j.


Raising the Bar: Progress in 3D-Printed Hybrid Bone Scaffolds for Clinical Applications: A Review.

Khan A, Grewal N, Jun Z, Tawfiq F, Tchier F, Zulqarnain R Cell Transplant. 2024; 33:9636897241273562.

PMID: 39517106 PMC: 11549696. DOI: 10.1177/09636897241273562.


Personalized bioceramic grafts for craniomaxillofacial bone regeneration.

de Carvalho A, Rahimnejad M, Oliveira R, Sikder P, Saavedra G, Bhaduri S Int J Oral Sci. 2024; 16(1):62.

PMID: 39482290 PMC: 11528123. DOI: 10.1038/s41368-024-00327-7.


Advances in biomaterials for oral-maxillofacial bone regeneration: spotlight on periodontal and alveolar bone strategies.

Li N, Wang J, Feng G, Liu Y, Shi Y, Wang Y Regen Biomater. 2024; 11:rbae078.

PMID: 39055303 PMC: 11272181. DOI: 10.1093/rb/rbae078.


Scaffold Application for Bone Regeneration with Stem Cells in Dentistry: Literature Review.

Saberian E, Zafari Y, Jenca A, Petrasova A, Zare-Zardini H, Jencova J Cells. 2024; 13(12.

PMID: 38920693 PMC: 11202130. DOI: 10.3390/cells13121065.


References
1.
Chaushu L, Chaushu G, Kolerman R, Vered M, Naishlos S, Nissan J . Anterior atrophic mandible restoration using cancellous bone block allograft. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019; 21(5):903-909. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12744. View

2.
Ostrowska B, Di Luca A, Szlazak K, Moroni L, Swieszkowski W . Influence of internal pore architecture on biological and mechanical properties of three-dimensional fiber deposited scaffolds for bone regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2016; 104(4):991-1001. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.35637. View

3.
Rajan A, Eubanks E, Edwards S, Aronovich S, Travan S, Rudek I . Optimized cell survival and seeding efficiency for craniofacial tissue engineering using clinical stem cell therapy. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2014; 3(12):1495-503. PMC: 4250207. DOI: 10.5966/sctm.2014-0039. View

4.
Bajestan M, Rajan A, Edwards S, Aronovich S, Cevidanes L, Polymeri A . Stem cell therapy for reconstruction of alveolar cleft and trauma defects in adults: A randomized controlled, clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017; 19(5):793-801. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12506. View

5.
Aytac Z, Dubey N, Daghrery A, Ferreira J, de Souza Araujo I, Castilho M . Innovations in Craniofacial Bone and Periodontal Tissue Engineering - From Electrospinning to Converged Biofabrication. Int Mater Rev. 2022; 67(4):347-384. PMC: 9216197. DOI: 10.1080/09506608.2021.1946236. View