» Articles » PMID: 35071019

Perspectives and Expertise in Establishing a Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Programme for Challenging Childhood Cancer Patient Populations

Overview
Journal Front Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2022 Jan 24
PMID 35071019
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The utility of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) in the setting of childhood cancer is a largely underused tool, despite the common use of cytotoxic chemotherapeutics. While it is encouraging that modern advances in chemotherapy have transformed outcomes for children diagnosed with cancer, this has come at the cost of an elevated risk of life-changing long-term morbidity and late effects. This concern can limit the intensity at which these drugs are used. Widely used chemotherapeutics exhibit marked inter-patient variability in drug exposures following standard dosing, with fine margins between exposures resulting in toxicity and those resulting in potentially suboptimal efficacy, thereby fulfilling criteria widely accepted as fundamental for TDM approaches. Over the past decade in the UK, the paediatric oncology community has increasingly embraced the potential benefits of utilising TDM for particularly challenging patient groups, including infants, anephric patients and those receiving high dose chemotherapy. This has been driven by a desire from paediatric oncologists to have access to clinical pharmacology information to support dosing decisions being made. This provides the potential to modify doses between treatment cycles based on a comprehensive set of clinical information, with individual patient drug exposures being used alongside clinical response and tolerability data to inform dosing for subsequent cycles. The current article provides an overview of recent experiences of conducting TDM in a childhood cancer setting, from the perspectives of the clinicians, scientists and pharmacists implementing TDM-based dosing recommendations. The ongoing programme of work has facilitated investigations into the validity of current approaches to dosing for some of the most challenging childhood cancer patient groups, with TDM approaches now being expanded from well-established cytotoxic drugs through to newer targeted treatments.

Citing Articles

Generation of evidence-based carboplatin dosing guidelines for neonates and infants.

Barnett S, Makin G, Tweddle D, Osborne C, Veal G Br J Cancer. 2023; 129(11):1773-1779.

PMID: 37816842 PMC: 10667364. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02456-y.


Should personalised dosing have a role in cancer treatment?.

Villette C, Orrell D, Millen J, Chassagnole C Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1154493.

PMID: 37213297 PMC: 10196464. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1154493.

References
1.
Mueller-Schoell A, Groenland S, Scherf-Clavel O, van Dyk M, Huisinga W, Michelet R . Therapeutic drug monitoring of oral targeted antineoplastic drugs. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2020; 77(4):441-464. PMC: 7935845. DOI: 10.1007/s00228-020-03014-8. View

2.
Kendrick J, Carr R, Ensom M . Pharmacokinetics and drug dosing in obese children. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2012; 15(2):94-109. PMC: 3018176. View

3.
Huang I, Bhakta N, Brinkman T, Klosky J, Krull K, Srivastava D . Determinants and Consequences of Financial Hardship Among Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancer: A Report From the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018; 111(2):189-200. PMC: 6657283. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djy120. View

4.
Barnett S, Hellmann F, Parke E, Makin G, Tweddle D, Osborne C . Vincristine dosing, drug exposure and therapeutic drug monitoring in neonate and infant cancer patients. Eur J Cancer. 2021; 164:127-136. PMC: 8914346. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.09.014. View

5.
Lankheet N, Desar I, Mulder S, Burger D, Kweekel D, Van Herpen C . Optimizing the dose in cancer patients treated with imatinib, sunitinib and pazopanib. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017; 83(10):2195-2204. PMC: 5595974. DOI: 10.1111/bcp.13327. View