Bridging Classical and Revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory Research: A Longitudinal Analysis of a Large Population Study

Overview

Journal Front Psychol

Date 2022 Jan 24

PMID 35069316

Authors

Daniela A Espinoza Oyarce

Richard Burns

Peter Butterworth

Nicolas Cherbuin

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST) proposes that neurobiological systems mediate protective and appetitive behaviours and the functioning of these systems is associated to personality traits. In this manner, the RST is a link between neuroscience, behaviour, and personality. The theory evolved to the present revised version describing three systems: fight-flight-freezing, behavioural approach/activation (BAS), and behavioural inhibition (BIS). However, the most widely available measure of the theory, the BIS/BAS scales, only investigates two systems. Using a large longitudinal community survey, we found that the BIS/BAS scales can be re-structured to investigate the three systems of the theory with a BIS scale, three BAS scales, and a separate fight-flight-freezing system (FFFS) scale. The re-structured scales were age, sex, and longitudinally invariant, and associations with personality and mental health measures followed theoretical expectations and previously published associations. The proposed framework can be used to investigate behavioural choices influencing physical and mental health and bridge historical with contemporary research.

Citing Articles

Sensitivity to rewards and punishments in karate athletes: an examination of the temperamental characteristics and profile of karate competitors according to the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory.

Kusnierz C, Rogowska A, Gorner K, Wosinek P BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2024; 16(1):178.

PMID: 39187851 PMC: 11346272. DOI: 10.1186/s13102-024-00971-w.

The reinforcement sensitivity theory affects questionnaire (RST-AQ). A validation study of a new scale targeting affects related to anxiety, approach motivation and fear.

Franchina V, Klackl J, Jonas E Curr Psychol. 2024; 43(6):5193-5205.

PMID: 38524832 PMC: 10959810. DOI: 10.1007/s12144-023-04623-z.

The effect of courage on stress: The mediating mechanism of behavioral inhibition and behavioral activation in high-risk occupations.

Wang J, Sun D, Jiang J, Wang H, Cheng X, Ruan Q Front Psychol. 2022; 13:961387.

PMID: 36059774 PMC: 9434112. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.961387.

References

Poythress N, Skeem J, Weir J, Lilienfeld S, Douglas K, Edens J . Psychometric Properties of Carver and White's (1994) BIS/BAS Scales in a Large Sample of Offenders. Pers Individ Dif. 2009; 45(8):732-737. PMC: 2598744. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2008.07.021. View

Reuter M, Cooper A, Smillie L, Markett S, Montag C . A new measure for the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory: psychometric criteria and genetic validation. Front Syst Neurosci. 2015; 9:38. PMC: 4360558. DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2015.00038. View

WATSON D, Clark L, Tellegen A . Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988; 54(6):1063-70. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063. View

Anstey K, Christensen H, Butterworth P, Easteal S, Mackinnon A, Jacomb T . Cohort profile: the PATH through life project. Int J Epidemiol. 2011; 41(4):951-60. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyr025. View

Yu R, Branje S, Keijsers L, Meeus W . Psychometric characteristics of Carver and White's BIS/BAS scales in Dutch adolescents and their mothers. J Pers Assess. 2011; 93(5):500-7. DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2011.595745. View

Smillie L, Pickering A, Jackson C . The new reinforcement sensitivity theory: implications for personality measurement. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2007; 10(4):320-35. DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_3. View

Baumann M, Oviatt D, Garza R, Gonzalez-Blanks A, Lopez S, Alexander-Delpech P . Variation in BAS-BIS profiles across categories of cigarette use. Addict Behav. 2014; 39(10):1477-83. PMC: 4593404. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.05.028. View

Corr P . Reinforcement sensitivity theory and personality. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2004; 28(3):317-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.01.005. View

Der-Avakian A, Markou A . The neurobiology of anhedonia and other reward-related deficits. Trends Neurosci. 2011; 35(1):68-77. PMC: 3253139. DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2011.11.005. View

10.

Anstey K, Butterworth P, Christensen H, Easteal S, Cherbuin N, Leach L . Cohort Profile Update: The PATH Through Life Project. Int J Epidemiol. 2020; 50(1):35-36. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyaa179. View

11.

Pagliaccio D, Luking K, Anokhin A, Gotlib I, Hayden E, Olino T . Revising the BIS/BAS Scale to study development: Measurement invariance and normative effects of age and sex from childhood through adulthood. Psychol Assess. 2015; 28(4):429-42. PMC: 4766059. DOI: 10.1037/pas0000186. View

12.

Goldberg D, Bridges K, Grayson D . Detecting anxiety and depression in general medical settings. BMJ. 1988; 297(6653):897-9. PMC: 1834427. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.297.6653.897. View

13.

van Tol M, Van der Wee N, van den Heuvel O, Nielen M, Demenescu L, Aleman A . Regional brain volume in depression and anxiety disorders. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010; 67(10):1002-11. DOI: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.121. View

14.

Bijttebier P, Beck I, Claes L, Vandereycken W . Gray's Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory as a framework for research on personality-psychopathology associations. Clin Psychol Rev. 2009; 29(5):421-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.04.002. View

15.

Li C . Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behav Res Methods. 2015; 48(3):936-49. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7. View

16.

Espinoza Oyarce D, Shaw M, Alateeq K, Cherbuin N . Volumetric brain differences in clinical depression in association with anxiety: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2020; 45(6):406-429. PMC: 7595741. DOI: 10.1503/jpn.190156. View

17.

Wu H, Estabrook R . Identification of Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models of Different Levels of Invariance for Ordered Categorical Outcomes. Psychometrika. 2016; 81(4):1014-1045. PMC: 5458787. DOI: 10.1007/s11336-016-9506-0. View

18.

Corr P, Perkins A . The role of theory in the psychophysiology of personality: from Ivan Pavlov to Jeffrey Gray. Int J Psychophysiol. 2006; 62(3):367-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.01.005. View

19.

Corr P, Cooper A . The Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory of Personality Questionnaire (RST-PQ): Development and validation. Psychol Assess. 2016; 28(11):1427-1440. DOI: 10.1037/pas0000273. View

20.

Gray J . The psychophysiological basis of introversion-extraversion. Behav Res Ther. 1970; 8(3):249-66. DOI: 10.1016/0005-7967(70)90069-0. View