» Articles » PMID: 35068858

Immunotherapies for Well-differentiated Grade 3 Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A New Category in the World Health Organization Classification

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2022 Jan 24
PMID 35068858
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

According to the 2019 World Health Organization (WHO) classification, well-differentiated grade 3 (G3) gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a new category of cancer of the digestive system. G3 GEP-NET research and treatment are not as robust as those of lower grade (G1/2) NETs and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). Previously, the management of high-grade NETs was mainly based on NEC therapies, as high-grade NETs were classified as NECs under the previous WHO classification. Despite this, G3 GEP-NETs are significantly less responsive to platinum-based chemotherapy regimens than NECs, due to their distinct molecular pathogenesis and course of pathological grade transition. Patients with advanced G3 GEP-NETs, who have progressed or are intolerant to chemotherapy regimens such as capecitabine plus temozolomide, have limited treatment choices. Immunotherapy has helped patients with a variety of cancers attain long-term survival through the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Immunotherapies, either alone or in combination with other therapies, do not have a clear function in the treatment of G3 GEP-NETs. Currently, the majority of immunotherapy studies, both prospective and retrospective, do not reliably differentiate G3 GEP-NETs from NECs. By contrast, a significant number of studies include non-GEP neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). Therefore, there is an urgent need to summarize and evaluate these data to provide more effective therapeutic approaches for patients with this rare tumor. The purpose of this mini-review was to screen and summarize information on G3 GEP-NETs from all studies on NENs immunotherapy.

Citing Articles

Methodology of the SORENTO clinical trial: a prospective, randomised, active-controlled phase 3 trial assessing the efficacy and safety of high exposure octreotide subcutaneous depot (CAM2029) in patients with GEP-NET.

Singh S, Ferone D, Capdevila J, Chan J, de Herder W, Halperin D Trials. 2024; 25(1):58.

PMID: 38229199 PMC: 10790497. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07834-8.


Molecular factors, diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal tract neuroendocrine tumors: An update.

Pavlidis E, Pavlidis T World J Clin Cases. 2022; 10(27):9573-9587.

PMID: 36186187 PMC: 9516923. DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i27.9573.

References
1.
Scoazec J, Couvelard A, Monges G, Guyetant S, Bisot-Locard S, Parot X . Professional Practices and Diagnostic Issues in Neuroendocrine Tumour Pathology: Results of a Prospective One-Year Survey among French Pathologists (the PRONET Study). Neuroendocrinology. 2016; 105(1):67-76. DOI: 10.1159/000448431. View

2.
Yao J, Hassan M, Phan A, Dagohoy C, Leary C, Mares J . One hundred years after "carcinoid": epidemiology of and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumors in 35,825 cases in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26(18):3063-72. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.4377. View

3.
Oronsky B, Ma P, Morgensztern D, Carter C . Nothing But NET: A Review of Neuroendocrine Tumors and Carcinomas. Neoplasia. 2017; 19(12):991-1002. PMC: 5678742. DOI: 10.1016/j.neo.2017.09.002. View

4.
Botling J, Lamarca A, Bajic D, Norlen O, Lonngren V, Kjaer J . High-Grade Progression Confers Poor Survival in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors. Neuroendocrinology. 2019; 110(11-12):891-898. DOI: 10.1159/000504392. View

5.
Rindi G, Klimstra D, Abedi-Ardekani B, Asa S, Bosman F, Brambilla E . A common classification framework for neuroendocrine neoplasms: an International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and World Health Organization (WHO) expert consensus proposal. Mod Pathol. 2018; 31(12):1770-1786. PMC: 6265262. DOI: 10.1038/s41379-018-0110-y. View