» Articles » PMID: 35066600

Signal-on/signal-off Bead-based Assays for the Multiplexed Monitoring of Base Excision Repair Activities by Flow Cytometry

Overview
Specialty Chemistry
Date 2022 Jan 23
PMID 35066600
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

As the support of all living kingdoms' genetic information, the integrity of the DNA biomolecule must be preserved. To that goal, cells have evolved specific DNA repair pathways to thwart a large diversity of chemical substances and radiations that alter the DNA structure and lead to the development of pathologies such as cancers or neurodegenerative diseases. When dysregulated, activity rates of various actors of DNA repair can play a key role in carcinogenesis as well as in drugs resistance or hypersensitivity mechanisms. For the last 10 years, new complementary treatments have aimed at targeting specific enzymes responsible for such resistances. It is therefore crucial for biomedical research and clinical diagnosis to develop fast and sensitive tools able to measure the activity rate of DNA repair enzymes. In this work, a new assay for measuring enzymatic activities using microbeacons (µBs) is expounded. µB refers to microsphere functionalized by hairpin-shaped nucleic acid probes containing a single site-specific lesion in the stem and modified with chromophores. Following the processing of the lesion by the targeted protein, µB is cleaved and either lights off (signal-off strategy) or on (signal-on), depending on the use of fluorescent or profluorescent probes, respectively. After an optimization phase of the assay, we reported the combined analysis of restriction enzyme, AP-endonuclease, and DNA N-glycosylase by real-time monitoring followed by a flow cytometry measurement. As proofs of concept, we demonstrated the potential of the biosensor for highlighting DNA repair inhibitors and discriminating cell lines from their enzymatic activities.

Citing Articles

Use of a sample injection loop for an accurate measurement of particle number concentration by flow cytometry.

Shin H, Yang I, Park S, Lee J Anal Bioanal Chem. 2024; 416(20):4481-4490.

PMID: 38926227 PMC: 11294435. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-024-05387-6.

References
1.
Burrows C, Muller J . Oxidative Nucleobase Modifications Leading to Strand Scission. Chem Rev. 2002; 98(3):1109-1152. DOI: 10.1021/cr960421s. View

2.
Cadet J, Douki T, Gasparutto D, Ravanat J . Oxidative damage to DNA: formation, measurement and biochemical features. Mutat Res. 2003; 531(1-2):5-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2003.09.001. View

3.
Gates K . An overview of chemical processes that damage cellular DNA: spontaneous hydrolysis, alkylation, and reactions with radicals. Chem Res Toxicol. 2009; 22(11):1747-60. PMC: 2806061. DOI: 10.1021/tx900242k. View

4.
Chatterjee N, Walker G . Mechanisms of DNA damage, repair, and mutagenesis. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2017; 58(5):235-263. PMC: 5474181. DOI: 10.1002/em.22087. View

5.
Hoeijmakers J . Genome maintenance mechanisms for preventing cancer. Nature. 2001; 411(6835):366-74. DOI: 10.1038/35077232. View