» Articles » PMID: 35061100

Modified Use of the Proximal Humeral Internal Locking System (PHILOS) Plate for Distal Femoral Nonunions

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2022 Jan 21
PMID 35061100
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Nonunion is a common complication after a distal femoral fracture (DFF). Standard treatment consists of revision plating and/or bone grafting. Single lateral plating for a distal femoral nonunion can be insufficient in case of a persistent medial gap and compromised bone stock. Alternatively, dual plating can be used to treat a distal femoral nonunion, but to date there is no Gold standard. The aim of our study was to report our results after use of a minimally invasively placed proximal humeral internal locking system (Philos) plate as a medial buttress in the treatment of a distal femoral nonunion.

Methods: Fifteen adult patients with a distal femoral nonunion were prospectively entered in a trauma database and retrospectively assessed. All patients underwent a similar operation, which included removal of failed hardware, nonunion debridement, fixation with a lateral plate, and a medial Philos plate combined with bone grafting. Data collected included union rate, time to union, complications and functional outcome.

Results: In twelve out of fifteen patients (80%), the fracture united after our index operation. Median time to union was 4.8 months (range 1.6-15). Three patients (20%) needed additional bone grafting surgery. One patient underwent a Judet quadricepsplasty.

Conclusion: This study suggests that the Philos plate is a safe and effective adjunct as a medial buttress plate for distal femoral nonunions.

Citing Articles

Medial augmentation of distal femur fractures using the contralateral distal femur locking plate: A technical note.

Leal J OTA Int. 2024; 7(3):e347.

PMID: 39228878 PMC: 11365623. DOI: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000347.


Outcome of Osteosynthesis of Late-Presenting Proximal Humerus Non-union: A Case Series.

Mukhopadhaya J, Singh N, Gupta A, Bhadani J J Orthop Case Rep. 2024; 14(2):165-172.

PMID: 38420251 PMC: 10898685. DOI: 10.13107/jocr.2024.v14.i02.4258.

References
1.
Court-Brown C, Caesar B . Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review. Injury. 2006; 37(8):691-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.130. View

2.
Elsoe R, Ceccotti A, Larsen P . Population-based epidemiology and incidence of distal femur fractures. Int Orthop. 2017; 42(1):191-196. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-017-3665-1. View

3.
Yoon B, Park I, Kim Y, Oh H, Choo S, Sung Y . Incidence of nonunion after surgery of distal femoral fractures using contemporary fixation device: a meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020; 141(2):225-233. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-020-03463-x. View

4.
Sain A, Sharma V, Farooque K, V M, Pattabiraman K . Dual Plating of the Distal Femur: Indications and Surgical Techniques. Cureus. 2020; 11(12):e6483. PMC: 6935741. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.6483. View

4.
Ebraheim N, Buchanan G, Liu X, Cooper M, Peters N, Hessey J . Treatment of Distal Femur Nonunion Following Initial Fixation with a Lateral Locking Plate. Orthop Surg. 2016; 8(3):323-30. PMC: 6584123. DOI: 10.1111/os.12257. View