» Articles » PMID: 35060052

Study of Coliforms and Clostridium Bacteria Inactivation in Wastewaters by a Pilot Photolysis Process and by the Maturation Lagoons of a Low-cost Nature-based WWTP

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2022 Jan 21
PMID 35060052
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The inactivation processes of coliform bacteria (total and fecal) and sulphito-reducing Clostridium bacteria (vegetative species and spores) in water maturation lagoon of a low-cost nature-based wastewater treatment plant using constructed wetlands and through processes of photolysis in a pilot photoreactor have been comparatively studied. The different inactivation mechanisms by photolysis of these bacteria have been studied following the criteria of different statistical and kinetic models. Clostridium disinfection treatments fit models in which two types of bacteria populations coexist, one sensitive (vegetative species) and the other (spores) resistant to the treatment, the sensitive one (94%) with an inactivation rate of k = 0.24 ± 0.07 min and the resistant one (6%) with k = 0.11 ± 0.05 min. Total coliform photolytic disinfection also shows two populations with different physiological state. The time required to reduce the first logarithmic decimal cycle of the different types of bacteria (physiological states) are δ = 4.2 ± 0.9 and δ = 8.3 ± 1.1 min, respectively. For fecal coliform photolytic disinfection, only bacteria population, with k = 1.15 ± 0.19 min, is found. The results obtained confirm the photolytic disinfection processes and maturation lagoon are effective systems for Clostridia bacteria removal after water treatment by nature-based systems. Total removal of coliform bacteria is not achieved by maturation lagoons, but their reduction is significant using low doses of cumulative radiation.

Citing Articles

Microbial and potentially toxic elements risk assessment in high Andean river water based on Monte Carlo simulation, Peru.

Custodio M, Penaloza R, Ochoa S, De la Cruz H, Rodriguez C, Cuadrado W Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):21473.

PMID: 38053001 PMC: 10697974. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-48853-4.

References
1.
Almuktar S, Abed S, Scholz M . Wetlands for wastewater treatment and subsequent recycling of treated effluent: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018; 25(24):23595-23623. PMC: 6096557. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-2629-3. View

2.
Cerf O . Tailing of survival curves of bacterial spores. J Appl Bacteriol. 1977; 42(1):1-19. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1977.tb00665.x. View

3.
Mafart P, Couvert O, Gaillard S, Leguerinel I . On calculating sterility in thermal preservation methods: application of the Weibull frequency distribution model. Int J Food Microbiol. 2002; 72(1-2):107-13. DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1605(01)00624-9. View

4.
Tanner C, Craggs R, Sukias J, Park J . Comparison of maturation ponds and constructed wetlands as the final stage of an advanced pond system. Water Sci Technol. 2005; 51(12):307-14. View

5.
Nguyen M, Jasper J, Boehm A, Nelson K . Sunlight inactivation of fecal indicator bacteria in open-water unit process treatment wetlands: Modeling endogenous and exogenous inactivation rates. Water Res. 2015; 83:282-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.06.043. View