» Articles » PMID: 35057402

In Vitro Analysis of the Fatigue Resistance of Four Single File Canal Preparation Instruments

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Jan 21
PMID 35057402
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Instrument separation during root canal therapy is inevitable in endodontics with several unfavorable clinical consequences. Therefore, examining the cyclic flexural fatigue resistance of commonly used rotary endodontic files is crucial. This study aimed to determine the cyclic flexural fatigue resistance of four nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary files used as a single canal preparation technique: WaveOne, Reciproc, Protaper F2, and Unicone medium instruments. According to the manufacturer's instructions, each file was rotated freely within a 1.3 mm deep and 1.3 mm wide V-shaped groove in a stainless-steel block with a 40° and 5 mm radius of curvature. Cyclic fatigue resistance was compared between the NiTi files by verifying the time needed to crack. The data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Scheffé post hoc with a significant level set at < 0.05. Our results demonstrated that the WaveOne instrument had the highest cyclic flexural fatigue resistance among the tested groups ( ≤ 0.05), while Unicone had the lowest cyclic flexural fatigue resistance. This study concluded that WaveOne size 25/0.08 could illustrate a superior cyclic flexural fatigue resistance when instrumenting root canals with the lowest possibility to cause instrument separation.

Citing Articles

Research on NiTi instruments combined with ultrasonic irrigation and multiantibiotic paste in root canal therapy of periapical inflammation in deciduous teeth.

Zhu Z, Fu G Exp Ther Med. 2024; 28(3):346.

PMID: 39006454 PMC: 11240859. DOI: 10.3892/etm.2024.12635.


Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Rotary versus Reciprocating Endodontic Files: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

De Pedro-Munoz A, Rico-Romano C, Sanchez-Llobet P, Montiel-Company J, Mena-Alvarez J J Clin Med. 2024; 13(3).

PMID: 38337577 PMC: 10856014. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13030882.


Determination of a Representative and 3D-Printable Root Canal Geometry for Endodontic Investigations and Pre-Clinical Endodontic Training-An Ex Vivo Study.

Kucher M, Dannemann M, Modler N, Bohm R, Hannig C, Kuhne M Dent J (Basel). 2023; 11(5).

PMID: 37232784 PMC: 10217352. DOI: 10.3390/dj11050133.


The state of the art and future trends of root canal files from the perspective of patent analysis: a study design.

Jiang J, Sun J, Huang Z, Bi Z, Yu G, Yang J Biomed Eng Online. 2022; 21(1):90.

PMID: 36566212 PMC: 9789667. DOI: 10.1186/s12938-022-01060-0.

References
1.
AlRahabi M, Ghabbani H . Removal of a separated endodontic instrument by using the modified hollow tube-based extractor system: A case report. SAGE Open Med Case Rep. 2020; 8:2050313X20907822. PMC: 7036497. DOI: 10.1177/2050313X20907822. View

2.
Walia H, Brantley W, Gerstein H . An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. J Endod. 1988; 14(7):346-51. DOI: 10.1016/s0099-2399(88)80196-1. View

3.
Tabassum S, Zafar K, Umer F . Nickel-Titanium Rotary File Systems: What's New?. Eur Endod J. 2020; 4(3):111-117. PMC: 7006588. DOI: 10.14744/eej.2019.80664. View

4.
McGuigan M, Louca C, Duncan H . Endodontic instrument fracture: causes and prevention. Br Dent J. 2013; 214(7):341-8. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2013.324. View

5.
Cheung G, Darvell B . Fatigue testing of a NiTi rotary instrument. Part 1: Strain-life relationship. Int Endod J. 2007; 40(8):612-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01262.x. View