» Articles » PMID: 35057001

Combining Nanocarrier-Assisted Delivery of Molecules and Radiotherapy

Overview
Journal Pharmaceutics
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Jan 21
PMID 35057001
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cancer is responsible for a significant proportion of death all over the world. Therefore, strategies to improve its treatment are highly desired. The use of nanocarriers to deliver anticancer treatments has been extensively investigated and improved since the approval of the first liposomal formulation for cancer treatment in 1995. Radiotherapy (RT) is present in the disease management strategy of around 50% of cancer patients. In the present review, we bring the state-of-the-art information on the combination of nanocarrier-assisted delivery of molecules and RT. We start with formulations designed to encapsulate single or multiple molecules that, once delivered to the tumor site, act directly on the cells to improve the effects of RT. Then, we describe formulations designed to modulate the tumor microenvironment by delivering oxygen or to boost the abscopal effect. Finally, we present how RT can be employed to trigger molecule delivery from nanocarriers or to modulate the EPR effect.

Citing Articles

Enhancing the Inhibition of Breast Cancer Growth Through Synergistic Modulation of the Tumor Microenvironment Using Combined Nano-Delivery Systems.

Wu J, Lu Q, Zhao J, Wu W, Wang Z, Yu G Int J Nanomedicine. 2024; 19:5125-5138.

PMID: 38855730 PMC: 11162247. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S460874.


Engineered nanomaterials trigger abscopal effect in immunotherapy of metastatic cancers.

Xia Y, Yang R, Zhu J, Wang H, Li Y, Fan J Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022; 10:890257.

PMID: 36394039 PMC: 9643844. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.890257.


Delivery of Molecules Using Nanoscale Systems for Cancer Treatment and/or Diagnosis.

Santiago Franco M, Youn Y Pharmaceutics. 2022; 14(4).

PMID: 35456689 PMC: 9028462. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14040851.

References
1.
Slatkin D, Spanne P, Dilmanian F, Sandborg M . Microbeam radiation therapy. Med Phys. 1992; 19(6):1395-400. DOI: 10.1118/1.596771. View

2.
Bouchet A, Lemasson B, Le Duc G, Maisin C, Brauer-Krisch E, Siegbahn E . Preferential effect of synchrotron microbeam radiation therapy on intracerebral 9L gliosarcoma vascular networks. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010; 78(5):1503-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.06.021. View

3.
Bouchet A, Lemasson B, Christen T, Potez M, Rome C, Coquery N . Synchrotron microbeam radiation therapy induces hypoxia in intracerebral gliosarcoma but not in the normal brain. Radiother Oncol. 2013; 108(1):143-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.05.013. View

4.
Baumann M, Ebert N, Kurth I, Bacchus C, Overgaard J . What will radiation oncology look like in 2050? A look at a changing professional landscape in Europe and beyond. Mol Oncol. 2020; 14(7):1577-1585. PMC: 7332208. DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.12731. View

5.
Bartzsch S, Cummings C, Eismann S, Oelfke U . A preclinical microbeam facility with a conventional x-ray tube. Med Phys. 2016; 43(12):6301. PMC: 5965367. DOI: 10.1118/1.4966032. View