» Articles » PMID: 35056987

Reconciling Oxygen and Aerosol Delivery with a Hood on In Vitro Infant and Paediatric Models

Overview
Journal Pharmaceutics
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Jan 21
PMID 35056987
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate optimal aerosol and oxygen delivery with a hood on an infant model and a paediatric model. A facemask and a hood with three inlets, with or without a front cover, were used. A small-volume nebuliser with a unit-dose of salbutamol was used for drug delivery and an air entrainment nebuliser was used to deliver oxygen at 35%. Infant and paediatric breathing patterns were mimicked; a bacterial filter was connected to the end of a manikin trachea for aerosol drug collection, and an oxygen analyser was used to measure the oxygen concentration. For the infant model, inhaled drug dose was significantly higher when the nebuliser was placed in the back of the hood and with a front cover. This was verified by complementary computational simulations in a comparable infant-hood model. For the paediatric model, the inhaled dose was greater with a facemask than with a hood. Oxygen delivery with a facemask and a hood with a front cover achieved a set concentration in both models, yet a hood without a front cover delivered oxygen at far lower concentrations than the set concentration.

Citing Articles

Production of highly immunogenic and safe Triton X-100 produced bacterial ghost vaccine against Shigella flexneri 2b serotype.

Abdelfattah A, Samir R, Amin H Gut Pathog. 2023; 15(1):41.

PMID: 37679798 PMC: 10483756. DOI: 10.1186/s13099-023-00568-7.


Nasal anatomy and sniffing in respiration and olfaction of wild and domestic animals.

Xi J, Si X, Malve M Front Vet Sci. 2023; 10:1172140.

PMID: 37520001 PMC: 10375297. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1172140.

References
1.
Amirav I, Oron A, Tal G, Cesar K, Ballin A, Houri S . Aerosol delivery in respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis: hood or face mask?. J Pediatr. 2005; 147(5):627-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.05.035. View

2.
Xi J, Si X, Nagarajan R . Effects of mask-wearing on the inhalability and deposition of airborne SARS-CoV-2 aerosols in human upper airway. Phys Fluids (1994). 2020; 32(12):123312. PMC: 7757581. DOI: 10.1063/5.0034580. View

3.
Amirav I, Shakked T, Broday D, Katoshevski D . Numerical investigation of aerosol deposition at the eyes when using a hood inhaler for infants--a 3D simulation. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2008; 21(2):207-14. DOI: 10.1089/jamp.2007.0619. View

4.
Rubin B . Bye-bye, blow-by. Respir Care. 2007; 52(8):981. View

5.
Xi J, Si X, Longest W . Electrostatic charge effects on pharmaceutical aerosol deposition in human nasal-laryngeal airways. Pharmaceutics. 2014; 6(1):26-35. PMC: 3978523. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics6010026. View