» Articles » PMID: 35053718

Performance of the EQ-5D-Y Interviewer Administered Version in Young Children

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2022 Jan 21
PMID 35053718
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

(1) Background: An estimated 78% of South African children aged 9-10 years have not mastered basic reading, therefore potentially excluding them from self-reporting on health-related outcome measures. Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the performance of the EQ-5D-Y-3L self-complete to the newly developed interviewer-administered version in children 8-10 years. (2) Methods: Children ( = 207) with chronic respiratory illnesses, functional disabilities, orthopaedic conditions and from the general population completed the EQ-5D-Y-3L self-complete and interviewer-administered versions, Moods and Feelings Questionnaire (MFQ) and Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R). A functional independence measure (WeeFIM) was completed by the researcher. (3) Results: The 8-year-olds had significantly higher missing responses (x = 14.23, < 0.001) on the self-complete version. Known-group and concurrent validity were comparable across dimensions, utility and VAS scores for the two versions. The dimensions showed low to moderate convergent validity with similar items on the MFQ, FPS-R and WeeFIM with significantly higher correlations between the interviewer-administered dimensions of Mobility and WeeFIM mobility total (z = 1.91, = 0.028) and Looking After Myself and WeeFIM self-care total (z = 3.24, = 0.001). Children preferred the interviewer-administered version (60%) (x = 21.87, < 0.001) with 22% of the reasons attributed to literacy level. (4) Conclusions: The EQ-5D-Y-3L interviewer-administered version is valid and reliable in children aged 8-10 years. The results were comparable to the self-complete version indicating that versions can be used interchangeably.

Citing Articles

How do children understand and respond to the EQ-5D-Y-3L? A mixed methods study in a community-based sample of 6-12-year-olds.

Khanna D, Lay K, Khadka J, Mpundu-Kaambwa C, Ratcliffe J Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024; 22(1):105.

PMID: 39633400 PMC: 11619400. DOI: 10.1186/s12955-024-02320-4.


Accuracy of Machine Learning in Discriminating Kawasaki Disease and Other Febrile Illnesses: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Zhu J, Yang F, Wang Y, Wang Z, Xiao Y, Wang L J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e57641.

PMID: 39556821 PMC: 11612596. DOI: 10.2196/57641.


The reliability and validity of the isixhosa version of the euroqol toddler and infant populations (EQ-TIPS) health related quality of life instrument.

Verstraete J, Amien R Afr Health Sci. 2024; 23(4):598-610.

PMID: 38974257 PMC: 11225485. DOI: 10.4314/ahs.v23i4.63.


An Investigation of Inter-Rater and Intra-Proxy Agreement in Measuring Quality of Life of Children in the Community Using the EQ-5D-Y-3L.

Khanna D, Khadka J, Mpundu-Kaambwa C, Chen G, Dalziel K, Devlin N Pharmacoeconomics. 2024; 42(Suppl 1):113-128.

PMID: 38280125 PMC: 11169018. DOI: 10.1007/s40273-024-01356-0.


Collecting Paediatric Health-Related Quality of Life Data: Assessing the Feasibility and Acceptability of the Australian Paediatric Multi-Instrument Comparison (P-MIC) Study.

Jones R, OLoughlin R, Xiong X, Bahrampour M, McGregor K, Yip S Children (Basel). 2023; 10(10).

PMID: 37892267 PMC: 10605580. DOI: 10.3390/children10101604.


References
1.
Rupel V, Ogorevc M . EQ-5D-Y Value Set for Slovenia. Pharmacoeconomics. 2021; 39(4):463-471. PMC: 8009800. DOI: 10.1007/s40273-020-00994-4. View

2.
Huber M, Knottnerus J, Green L, van der Horst H, Jadad A, Kromhout D . How should we define health?. BMJ. 2011; 343:d4163. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d4163. View

3.
Shiroiwa T, Ikeda S, Noto S, Fukuda T, Stolk E . Valuation Survey of EQ-5D-Y Based on the International Common Protocol: Development of a Value Set in Japan. Med Decis Making. 2021; 41(5):597-606. PMC: 8191148. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X211001859. View

4.
Varni J, Burwinkle T, Lane M . Health-related quality of life measurement in pediatric clinical practice: an appraisal and precept for future research and application. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005; 3:34. PMC: 1156928. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-3-34. View

5.
Kim S, Jo M, Kim S . A cross sectional survey on health-related quality of life of elementary school students using the Korean version of the EQ-5D-Y. PeerJ. 2017; 5:e3115. PMC: 5363254. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.3115. View