» Articles » PMID: 35047261

Novel Software for Pain Drawing Analysis

Overview
Journal Cureus
Date 2022 Jan 20
PMID 35047261
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction Pain drawings (PDs) are an important component of the assessment of a patient with pain. Although analog pain drawings (APDs), such as pen-on-paper drawings, have been extensively used in clinical assessment and clinical research, there is a lack of digital pain drawing (DPD) software that would be able to quantify and analyze the digital pain distribution obtained by the patients. The aim of this work is to describe a method that can quantify the extent and location of pain through novel custom-built software able to analyze data from the digital pain drawings obtained from the patients. Methods The application analysis and software specifications were based on the information gathered from the literature, and the programmers created the custom-built software according to the published needs of the pain scientific community. Results We developed a custom-built software named "Pain Distribution," which, among others, automatically calculates the number of the pixels the patient has chosen and therefore quantifies the pain extent, provides the frequency distribution from a group of images, and has the option to select the threshold over which the patient is considered with central sensitization (CS). Additionally, it delivers results and statistics for both every image and the frequency distribution, providing mean values, standard deviations, and CS indicators, as well as the ability to export them in *.txt file format for further analysis. Conclusion A novel Pain Distribution application was developed, freely available for use in any setting, clinical, research, or academic.

Citing Articles

Spatial Distribution Dynamics of Sensory Disturbances in the Treatment of Obesity-Related Meralgia Paresthetica Using Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation.

Al-Zamil M, Kulikova N, Shnayder N, Korchazhkina N, Petrova M, Mansur N J Clin Med. 2025; 14(2).

PMID: 39860396 PMC: 11765708. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14020390.


Automated Pain Spots Recognition Algorithm Provided by a Web Service-Based Platform: Instrument Validation Study.

Cescon C, Landolfi G, Bonomi N, Derboni M, Giuffrida V, Rizzoli A JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024; 12:e53119.

PMID: 39189897 PMC: 11370187. DOI: 10.2196/53119.

References
1.
Nijs J, Torres-Cueco R, van Wilgen C, Girbes E, Struyf F, Roussel N . Applying modern pain neuroscience in clinical practice: criteria for the classification of central sensitization pain. Pain Physician. 2014; 17(5):447-57. View

2.
Jamison R, Fanciullo G, Baird J . Usefulness of pain drawings in identifying real or imagined pain: accuracy of pain professionals, nonprofessionals, and a decision model. J Pain. 2004; 5(9):476-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2004.08.004. View

3.
Melzack R . The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain. 1975; 1(3):277-299. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(75)90044-5. View

4.
Elson D, Jones S, Caplan N, Stewart S, St Clair Gibson A, Kader D . The photographic knee pain map: locating knee pain with an instrument developed for diagnostic, communication and research purposes. Knee. 2010; 18(6):417-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2010.08.012. View

5.
Tucker K, Fels M, Walker S, Hodges P . Comparison of location, depth, quality, and intensity of experimentally induced pain in 6 low back muscles. Clin J Pain. 2014; 30(9):800-8. DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000026. View