Is a Boat Bigger Than a Ship? Null Results in the Investigation of Vowel Sound Symbolism on Size Judgements in Real Language

Overview

Journal Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)

Specialties Psychiatry
Psychology

Date 2022 Jan 20

PMID 35045778

Authors

David M Sidhu

Penny M Pexman

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Sound symbolism is the phenomenon by which certain kinds of phonemes are associated with perceptual and/or semantic properties. In this article, we explored (i.e., the mil/mal effect) in which high-front vowels (e.g., /i/) show an association with smallness, while low-back vowels (e.g., /ɑ/) show an association with largeness. This has previously been demonstrated with nonwords, but its impact on the processing of real language is unknown. We investigated this using a size judgement task, in which participants classified words for small or large objects, containing a small- or large-associated vowel, based on their size. Words were presented auditorily in Experiment 1 and visually in Experiment 2. We did not observe an effect of vowel congruence (i.e., between object size and the size association of its vowel) in either of the experiments. This suggests that there are limits to the impact of sound symbolism on the processing of real language.

Citing Articles

Non-arbitrary mappings between size and sound of English words: Form typicality effects during lexical access and memory.

de Zubicaray G, Arciuli J, Guenther F, McMahon K, Kearney E Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023; 77(5):943-963.

PMID: 37332149 PMC: 11032636. DOI: 10.1177/17470218231184940.

Implications of the "Language as Situated" View for Written Iconicity.

Sidhu D, Pexman P J Cogn. 2021; 4(1):40.

PMID: 34514311 PMC: 8396135. DOI: 10.5334/joc.159.

References

Brysbaert M, New B . Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: a critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behav Res Methods. 2009; 41(4):977-90. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.977. View

Thompson P, Estes Z . Sound symbolic naming of novel objects is a graded function. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011; 64(12):2392-404. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2011.605898. View

Parise C, Spence C . Audiovisual crossmodal correspondences and sound symbolism: a study using the implicit association test. Exp Brain Res. 2012; 220(3-4):319-33. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3140-6. View

Gallace A, Spence C . Multisensory synesthetic interactions in the speeded classification of visual size. Percept Psychophys. 2007; 68(7):1191-203. DOI: 10.3758/bf03193720. View

Sidhu D, Pexman P . What's in a Name? Sound Symbolism and Gender in First Names. PLoS One. 2015; 10(5):e0126809. PMC: 4446333. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126809. View

Scott G, Keitel A, Becirspahic M, Yao B, Sereno S . The Glasgow Norms: Ratings of 5,500 words on nine scales. Behav Res Methods. 2018; 51(3):1258-1270. PMC: 6538586. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-018-1099-3. View

Sellaro R, Treccani B, Job R, Cubelli R . Spatial coding of object typical size: evidence for a SNARC-like effect. Psychol Res. 2014; 79(6):950-62. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-014-0636-7. View

Kanero J, Imai M, Okuda J, Okada H, Matsuda T . How sound symbolism is processed in the brain: a study on Japanese mimetic words. PLoS One. 2014; 9(5):e97905. PMC: 4026540. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097905. View

Luce P . A computational analysis of uniqueness points in auditory word recognition. Percept Psychophys. 1986; 39(3):155-8. DOI: 10.3758/bf03212485. View

10.

Westbury C . Implicit sound symbolism in lexical access: evidence from an interference task. Brain Lang. 2005; 93(1):10-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.07.006. View

11.

Dehaene S, Dupoux E, Mehler J . Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1990; 16(3):626-41. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.16.3.626. View

12.

Brysbaert M, Warriner A, Kuperman V . Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behav Res Methods. 2013; 46(3):904-11. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-013-0403-5. View

13.

Kuperman V, Stadthagen-Gonzalez H, Brysbaert M . Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words. Behav Res Methods. 2012; 44(4):978-90. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-012-0210-4. View

14.

Ozturk O, Krehm M, Vouloumanos A . Sound symbolism in infancy: evidence for sound-shape cross-modal correspondences in 4-month-olds. J Exp Child Psychol. 2012; 114(2):173-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.05.004. View

15.

Vasishth S, Nicenboim B, Beckman M, Li F, Kong E . Bayesian data analysis in the phonetic sciences: A tutorial introduction. J Phon. 2018; 71:147-161. PMC: 6124675. DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2018.07.008. View

16.

Aryani A, Jacobs A . Affective Congruence between Sound and Meaning of Words Facilitates Semantic Decision. Behav Sci (Basel). 2018; 8(6). PMC: 6028912. DOI: 10.3390/bs8060056. View

17.

Spence C . Crossmodal correspondences: a tutorial review. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011; 73(4):971-95. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-010-0073-7. View

18.

Aryani A, Conrad M, Schmidtke D, Jacobs A . Why 'piss' is ruder than 'pee'? The role of sound in affective meaning making. PLoS One. 2018; 13(6):e0198430. PMC: 5991420. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198430. View

19.

Imai M, Kita S, Nagumo M, Okada H . Sound symbolism facilitates early verb learning. Cognition. 2008; 109(1):54-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.015. View

20.

Sidhu D, Deschamps K, Bourdage J, Pexman P . Does the name say it all? Investigating phoneme-personality sound symbolism in first names. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019; 148(9):1595-1614. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000662. View