» Articles » PMID: 35045099

The COVID-19 Alcohol Paradox: British Household Purchases During 2020 Compared with 2015-2019

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2022 Jan 19
PMID 35045099
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

British supermarket-panel data suggest no increases in overall sales and purchases of alcohol following COVID-19 lockdowns, yet survey and mortality data suggest otherwise. This paper attempts to unravel the paradox. Based on purchase data of 79,417 British households from Kantar Worldpanel, we undertake controlled interrupted time series analysis of the impact of COVID-19 confinement introduced on 23rd March 2020, and variably applied during 2020, compared to purchases during 2015 to 2019 as controls. We also undertook Poisson regression analyses to estimate if changes in purchases differed by household socio-demographic and economic factors. Excess off-trade household alcohol purchases (expressed as grams of ethanol) following the introduction of confinement, were 29.2% higher (95% CI = 25.8% to 32.5%) for the post-confinement months of 2020, being larger until mid-July 2020 (37.5%, 95%CI = 33.9 to 41.26%) when pubs re-opened with restrictions, and smaller (24.6%, 95%CI = 21.6 to 27.7) thereafter. During the time of complete pub closures, and fully adjusting for no on-trade purchases, household purchases of alcohol did not change when compared with the same time period during 2015-2019 (coefficient = -0.9%, 95%CI = -5.6 to 3.8). Excess purchases from 23rd March to 31st December 2020 varied by region of Great Britain, being higher in the north of England, and lower in Scotland and Wales. Excess purchases were greater in the most deprived households, compared with the least deprived households. Excess purchases increased substantially as the amount of alcohol normally purchased by a household increased, with the top one fifth of households that normally bought the most alcohol increasing their purchases more than 17 times than the bottom one fifth of households that bought the least alcohol. That the heaviest buyers of alcohol increased their purchases the most, with some independent impact of socio-economic disadvantage, might explain why reported alcohol problems and recent alcohol-related death rates might have increased. A conclusion of this is that alcohol policy to reduce high consumption of alcohol, and the availability of help and treatment to reduce alcohol consumption become more important during extraordinary times, such as COVID lockdowns.

Citing Articles

A qualitative exploration of triggers for alcohol use and access to support during the COVID-19 pandemic among people identifying as problem drinkers in the United Kingdom.

Yaqubi H, May T, Burton A Drug Alcohol Rev. 2025; 44(3):858-870.

PMID: 39935079 PMC: 11886483. DOI: 10.1111/dar.14013.


Mortality and hospitalizations fully attributable to alcohol use before versus during the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada.

Shi Y, Macrae K, de Groh M, Thompson W, Stockwell T CMAJ. 2025; 197(4):E87-E95.

PMID: 39900361 PMC: 11790301. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.241146.


Long-term health consequences and costs of changes in alcohol consumption in England during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Card-Gowers J, Boniface S, Brown J, Kock L, Martin A, Retat L PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0314870.

PMID: 39820181 PMC: 11737736. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314870.


How is health equity considered in policy evaluations employing quasi-experimental methods? A scoping review and content analysis.

Sell K, Rabbani S, Burns J Eur J Public Health. 2024; 35(1):42-51.

PMID: 39602551 PMC: 11832135. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckae188.


Parental Patterns of Alcohol Consumption During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review.

Ou C, Corby K, Booth K, Ou H Interact J Med Res. 2024; 13:e48339.

PMID: 39186759 PMC: 11384174. DOI: 10.2196/48339.


References
1.
Pechey R, Jebb S, Kelly M, Almiron-Roig E, Conde S, Nakamura R . Socioeconomic differences in purchases of more vs. less healthy foods and beverages: analysis of over 25,000 British households in 2010. Soc Sci Med. 2013; 92:22-6. PMC: 3726935. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.05.012. View

2.
Anderson P, ODonnell A, Kaner E, Llopis E, Manthey J, Rehm J . Impact of minimum unit pricing on alcohol purchases in Scotland and Wales: controlled interrupted time series analyses. Lancet Public Health. 2021; 6(8):e557-e565. DOI: 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00052-9. View

3.
Llopis E, ODonnell A, Anderson P . Impact of price promotion, price, and minimum unit price on household purchases of low and no alcohol beers and ciders: Descriptive analyses and interrupted time series analysis of purchase data from 70, 303 British households, 2015-2018 and first.... Soc Sci Med. 2021; 270:113690. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113690. View

4.
Jakobsen J, Gluud C, Wetterslev J, Winkel P . When and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials - a practical guide with flowcharts. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017; 17(1):162. PMC: 5717805. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-017-0442-1. View

5.
Anderson P, Llopis E, ODonnell A, Kaner E . Impact of COVID-19 Confinement on Alcohol Purchases in Great Britain: Controlled Interrupted Time-Series Analysis During the First Half of 2020 Compared With 2015-2018. Alcohol Alcohol. 2020; 56(3):307-316. PMC: 7717153. DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/agaa128. View