» Articles » PMID: 35044518

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Isolated ACL Reconstruction and Combined ACL with Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2022 Jan 19
PMID 35044518
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: To compare the clinical outcomes between isolated cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and combined ACL with anterolateral ligament reconstruction in chronic ACL injury especially with rotary instability problem.

Methods: Systematic searches were conducted of literature published up to July 2021 on PubMed, Google Search, and Cochrane databases for studies comparing isolated ACLR and ACL with anterolateral reconstruction. Two reviewers independently determined eligibility, extracted outcome data, and assessed the risk of bias of eligible studies. Pooled clinical outcomes used random effects with mean differences and risk ratio for continuous and dichotomous variables, respectively.

Results: After excluding 49 articles based on full-text screening, six studies were identified which met the inclusion criteria in the meta-analysis. Clinical outcomes such as residual laxity, rotatory instability, and graft failure were compared between isolated ACLR and combined ACL and anterolateral stability reconstruction. Overall, both clinical outcomes of isolated ACL and combined ACL with anterolateral reconstruction show improvement results in pivot shift test, the absence of residual laxity and incidence of graft failure. Compared to isolated ACLR, the prominent postoperative result was by combined ACL with anterolateral reconstruction which had significant differences in laxity outcome based on (I = 89%, p < 0.00001) and (MD = 0.71, 95%CI: 0.33-1.08, p = 0.00002).

Conclusions: The combined ACL with anterolateral reconstruction tended to have superior clinical outcomes, especially in the absence of residual laxity, compared to the isolated ACLR, but the other results were not significantly different statistically. Combined ACL and anterolateral reconstruction were not performed routinely for patients undergoing ACL reconstruction, but more suitable for chronic rotatory instability problem.

Citing Articles

Spin is Prevalent in Abstracts of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses of Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction and Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis.

Kumaran P, Kotlier J, Fathi A, Lin E, Petrigliano F, Liu J Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2025; 7(1):101031.

PMID: 40041847 PMC: 11873553. DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.101031.


Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Lateral Extra-Articular Procedures: A Systematic Review.

Migliorini F, Lucenti L, Mok Y, Bardazzi T, DAmbrosi R, De Carli A Medicina (Kaunas). 2025; 61(2).

PMID: 40005410 PMC: 11857574. DOI: 10.3390/medicina61020294.


Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Using Suspensory Button Fixation.

Castro A, Fernandes L, Silva A, Queiros C Arthrosc Tech. 2025; 14(1):103164.

PMID: 39989672 PMC: 11843298. DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2024.103164.


Anterolateral augmentation procedures during anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions in skeletally immature patients: Scoping review of surgical techniques and outcomes.

Dietvorst M, Verhagen S, van der Steen M, Van Douveren F, Janssen R J Exp Orthop. 2024; 11(1):e12012.

PMID: 38455455 PMC: 10915482. DOI: 10.1002/jeo2.12012.


The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: Current Concepts and Future Perspectives.

Andriollo L, Picchi A, Sangaletti R, Perticarini L, Rossi S, Logroscino G Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(3).

PMID: 38338185 PMC: 10855330. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12030300.


References
1.
Erden T, Toker B, Toprak A, Taser O . Comparison of the outcomes of isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and combined anterolateral ligament suture tape augmentation and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2021; 32(1):129-136. PMC: 8073455. DOI: 10.5606/ehc.2020.78201. View

2.
Ibrahim S, Shohdy E, Marwan Y, Ramadan S, Almisfer A, Mohammad M . Anatomic Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament of the Knee With or Without Reconstruction of the Anterolateral Ligament: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Am J Sports Med. 2017; 45(7):1558-1566. DOI: 10.1177/0363546517691517. View

3.
Hamido F, Habiba A, Marwan Y, Soliman A, Elkhadrawe T, Morsi M . Anterolateral ligament reconstruction improves the clinical and functional outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020; 29(4):1173-1180. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-06119-w. View

4.
Helito C, Camargo D, Sobrado M, Bonadio M, Giglio P, Pecora J . Combined reconstruction of the anterolateral ligament in chronic ACL injuries leads to better clinical outcomes than isolated ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018; 26(12):3652-3659. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-018-4934-2. View

5.
Nitri M, Rasmussen M, Williams B, Moulton S, Serra Cruz R, Dornan G . An In Vitro Robotic Assessment of the Anterolateral Ligament, Part 2: Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Combined With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2016; 44(3):593-601. DOI: 10.1177/0363546515620183. View