» Articles » PMID: 35044325

Treatment for the Concerned Significant Others of Gamblers: A Systematic Review

Overview
Journal J Behav Addict
Publisher Akademiai Kiado
Date 2022 Jan 19
PMID 35044325
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Aims: Research recognizes the extent of harm experienced by concerned significant others (CSOs) of gamblers. This systematic review's aims are to examine the interventions for CSOs, evaluate potential benefits, and thematically describe treatment processes. The Stress-Strain-Coping-Support model (SSCS) served as the theoretical framework.

Methods: Database searches were conducted in: MEDLINE, CINAHL Complete, Web of Science Core Collection, Social Services Abstracts, Applied Social Science Index and Abstracts, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and APA PsycInfo (between 01/Jan 2011-10/Jun 2021). Other search methods were also utilized. Inclusion criteria: interventions for CSOs with CSO specific outcomes. The Evidence Project Risk of Bias Tool was used for assessment.

Results: 19/768 records were included. Nine interventions were utilized: 3 CSO directed, 4 for couples, and 2 low threshold online interventions. A quantitative synthesis (N = 7 studies) of effect size estimates for depression and anxiety measures didn't indicate any intervention to have better outcomes than others. Core themes in the treatment process identified in the qualitative synthesis (N = 7) included: information and understanding, social support, coping skills, communication, and strain. Limitations in the evidence related to sampling, control-conditions and outcome measurements.

Discussion And Conclusion: Several interventions were identified, yet no specific interventions appeared more beneficial than others. Using the SSCS model, commonalities and differences in intervention content were identified, along with themes that influence treatment processes. The need for tailored interventions is discussed. Future treatment efficacy research should carefully select study designs and outcome measurements. PROSPERO (CRD42021229408).

Citing Articles

Study protocol for the family empowerment program: a randomized waitlist-controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of online Community Reinforcement and Family Training (CRAFT) on the wellbeing of family members with a relative experiencing....

Allan J, Snowdon N, Thapa S, Ahmed K BMC Psychiatry. 2024; 24(1):43.

PMID: 38200508 PMC: 10782775. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-023-05487-0.


The Efficacy of Psychosocial Interventions in Minimising the Harm Caused to Affected Others of Problem Gambling: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Vassallo M, DeGiovanni K, Montgomery P J Gambl Stud. 2023; 39(4):1927-1958.

PMID: 37294395 PMC: 10627969. DOI: 10.1007/s10899-023-10220-3.


Gambling-related harms to concerned significant others: A national Australian prevalence study.

Hing N, Russell A, Browne M, Rockloff M, Tulloch C, Rawat V J Behav Addict. 2022; 11(2):361-372.

PMID: 35895474 PMC: 9295213. DOI: 10.1556/2006.2022.00045.

References
1.
Dowling N . Commentary on Nilsson et al. (2020): The development of effective interventions for concerned significant others affected by gambling harms. Addiction. 2020; 115(7):1343-1344. DOI: 10.1111/add.15026. View

2.
Dowling N, Suomi A, Jackson A, Lavis T, Patford J, Cockman S . Problem Gambling and Intimate Partner Violence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2014; 17(1):43-61. DOI: 10.1177/1524838014561269. View

3.
Bonfils N, Grall-Bronnec M, Caillon J, Limosin F, Benyamina A, Aubin H . Giving room to subjectivity in understanding and assessing problem gambling: A patient-centered approach focused on quality of life. J Behav Addict. 2019; 8(1):103-113. PMC: 7044609. DOI: 10.1556/2006.7.2018.137. View

4.
Ingle P, Marotta J, McMillan G, Wisdom J . Significant others and gambling treatment outcomes. J Gambl Stud. 2008; 24(3):381-92. DOI: 10.1007/s10899-008-9092-x. View

5.
Barnett A, van der Pols J, Dobson A . Regression to the mean: what it is and how to deal with it. Int J Epidemiol. 2004; 34(1):215-20. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyh299. View