» Articles » PMID: 35036451

Differences in Shoulder Internal Rotation Strength Between Baseball Players With Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction and Healthy Controls

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2022 Jan 17
PMID 35036451
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Studies have indicated decreased shoulder internal rotation (IR) and external rotation (ER) strength in the throwing limb of baseball players after ulnar collateral ligament injury. There is limited evidence on the recovery of shoulder rotation strength after primary ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR).

Hypothesis: At the time of return to throwing, baseball players who underwent UCLR would demonstrate decreased IR and ER shoulder strength in the throwing arm as compared with healthy baseball players.

Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: Male competitive high school and collegiate baseball athletes participated in this study. Athletes who underwent UCLR were compared with healthy controls who were matched by age, height, weight, and position. Bilateral isometric shoulder ER and IR strength was measured using a handheld dynamometer for all participants at the time of initial evaluation (UCLR group) and throughout the course of a season (healthy group). Independent tests were run to calculate mean differences in ER and IR shoulder strength between the groups, with significance set at < .05.

Results: A total of 86 baseball athletes participated in this study (43 UCLR group, 43 healthy group). At the time of return to throwing (mean ± SD, 194 ± 30 days postoperatively), the 2 groups demonstrated no significant differences in nonthrowing arm ER or IR strength ( = .143 and .994, respectively). No significant difference was found between groups for throwing arm ER strength ( = .921); however, the UCLR group demonstrated significantly less throwing arm IR strength than the healthy group (144.2 ± 27.8 vs 157.6 ± 27.1 N; = .023).

Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrate that throwing arm rotator cuff strength may not fully recover before the initiation of a return-to-throwing program after UCLR. These data provide a potential framework for clinicians to assist in the management and exercise prescription of the baseball athlete after UCLR and before medical release and the initiation of a return-to-throwing program.

Citing Articles

A narrative review of little league shoulder: proximal humeral physis widening is only one piece of the puzzle, it is time to consider posterior glenoid dysplasia.

Myers N, Kennedy S, Arnold A, Gehring Z, Kruseman K, Conway J JSES Int. 2024; 8(4):724-733.

PMID: 39035657 PMC: 11258838. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.03.006.


Periscapular Strength Profile Changes in Collegiate Baseball Pitchers Over the Course of a Season.

Pabian P, Roach V, Howard R, Johnston L, McGuire R Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2024; 19(6):724-734.

PMID: 38835988 PMC: 11144669. DOI: 10.26603/001c.117398.

References
1.
Byram I, Bushnell B, Dugger K, Charron K, Harrell Jr F, Noonan T . Preseason shoulder strength measurements in professional baseball pitchers: identifying players at risk for injury. Am J Sports Med. 2010; 38(7):1375-82. DOI: 10.1177/0363546509360404. View

2.
Agresta C, Krieg K, Freehill M . Risk Factors for Baseball-Related Arm Injuries: A Systematic Review. Orthop J Sports Med. 2019; 7(2):2325967119825557. PMC: 6390229. DOI: 10.1177/2325967119825557. View

3.
Portney D, Buchler L, Lazaroff J, Gryzlo S, Saltzman M . Influence of Pitching Release Location on Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Risk Among Major League Baseball Pitchers. Orthop J Sports Med. 2019; 7(2):2325967119826540. PMC: 6385331. DOI: 10.1177/2325967119826540. View

4.
Hannon J, Garrison J, Conway J . Lower extremity balance is improved at time of return to throwing in baseball players after an ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction when compared to pre-operative measurements. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014; 9(3):356-64. PMC: 4060313. View

5.
Hayes K, Walton J, Szomor Z, Murrell G . Reliability of 3 methods for assessing shoulder strength. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002; 11(1):33-9. DOI: 10.1067/mse.2002.119852. View