» Articles » PMID: 35035274

The Transition Towards Circular Economy and Waste Within Accounting and Accountability Models: a Systematic Literature Review and Conceptual Framework

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2022 Jan 17
PMID 35035274
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A transition towards a circular economy is a challenge. It is vital to know that circularity and sustainability are two different segments. So, circular economy can only be achieved in the long-term perspective. This study investigates accounting and accountability for circular economy and waste. Considering these principles and based on a critical review of the literature, economic gains from the transition toward a circular economy are measurable; the problems for corporations and governments are diverse; the way to handle the stakeholders who are losing control in the circular economy is considerable. Diffusion of innovation theory is used to conduct this study. It is essential that an organisational design built should help implement the circular model. Targeted questions responded by adopting a systematic literature review approach by applying PRISMA protocol. This study examines 78 publications in English between 2012 and 2021, which present a map of the circular economy-related knowledge published in web of science and Scopus. Besides, this study includes 03 European Commission reports, 01 Ellen Macarthur Foundation report, 01 Council for the Environment and Infrastructure report, 01 report from SUN IZA, 01 UN Global Compact and 01 the Brundtland Commission report. The results highlight how circular economy, waste management, sustainability, accountability, and management accounting practices help to develop an ecosystem and achieve sustainable development goals of the United Nations 2030 Agenda. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Citing Articles

Antioxidant Bio-Compounds from Chestnut Waste: A Value-Adding and Food Sustainability Strategy.

Barletta R, Trezza A, Bernini A, Millucci L, Geminiani M, Santucci A Foods. 2025; 14(1.

PMID: 39796332 PMC: 11719609. DOI: 10.3390/foods14010042.


An integrated multicriteria decision making framework for the selection of waste cement dust filled automotive brake friction composites.

Singh T Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):6817.

PMID: 38514706 PMC: 11176197. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-46385-5.


A Drug Discovery Approach to a Reveal Novel Antioxidant Natural Source: The Case of Chestnut Burr Biomass.

Trezza A, Geminiani M, Cutrera G, Dreassi E, Frusciante L, Lamponi S Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(5).

PMID: 38473765 PMC: 10931234. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25052517.


Environmental uncertainty and digital technologies corporate in shaping corporate green behavior and tax avoidance.

Ao X, Ong T, Aprile R, Di Vaio A Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):22170.

PMID: 38092819 PMC: 10719301. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-49687-w.


Blockchain-smart contracts for sustainable project performance: bibliometric and content analyses.

Cheng M, Chong H, Xu Y Environ Dev Sustain. 2023; :1-24.

PMID: 37363021 PMC: 9979138. DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-03063-w.


References
1.
Hirsch J . An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(46):16569-72. PMC: 1283832. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0507655102. View

2.
Selcuk A . A Guide for Systematic Reviews: PRISMA. Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019; 57(1):57-58. PMC: 6461330. DOI: 10.5152/tao.2019.4058. View

3.
Mathews J, Tan H . Circular economy: Lessons from China. Nature. 2016; 531(7595):440-2. DOI: 10.1038/531440a. View

4.
Iacovidou E, Hahladakis J, Deans I, Velis C, Purnell P . Technical properties of biomass and solid recovered fuel (SRF) co-fired with coal: Impact on multi-dimensional resource recovery value. Waste Manag. 2017; 73:535-545. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.07.001. View

5.
Li K, Rollins J, Yan E . Web of Science use in published research and review papers 1997-2017: a selective, dynamic, cross-domain, content-based analysis. Scientometrics. 2018; 115(1):1-20. PMC: 5838136. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-017-2622-5. View