» Articles » PMID: 35033994

Efficacy of Anti-epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Agents in Patients with RAS Wild-type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ≥ 70 Years

Abstract

Purpose: Colorectal cancer (CRC) affects many older adults. We investigated the efficacy and safety of adding anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) agents to doublet chemotherapy (DC) in older patients.

Methods: Patients with RAS wild-type (WT) metastatic CRC (mCRC) receiving first-line DC + anti-EGFR (n = 1191) or DC alone (n = 729) from seven trials in the Aide de Recherche en Cancerologie Digestive database were included. The prognostic and predictive effects of age were investigated. Progression-free and overall survival (OS) were evaluated between age groups (≥70 vs <70) for DC + anti-EGFR. In addition, outcomes were compared between DC+/-anti-EGFR within age groups in three trials with a DC alone arm. Subsequently, the same analysis was conducted for left-sided tumours. Adverse events grade ≥3 (G3+) were compared between age groups.

Results: Older (vs younger) patients receiving DC + anti-EGFR had similar progression-free survival (PFS) (8.7 vs 10.3 months; hazard ratio (HR) = 1.20 [0.96-1.49];p = 0.107) but inferior OS (21.3 vs 26.3; HR = 1.36 [1.08-1.72];p = 0.011). DC + anti-EGFR (vs DC alone) improved OS (23.9 vs 20.3; HR = 0.82 [0.70-0.95];p = 0.008) and PFS (11.2 vs 8.9; HR = 0.70 [0.60-0.82];p < 0.001) in younger but not older patients: OS (24.7 vs 17.6; HR [95% confidence interval {CI}] = 0.77 [0.58-1.04];p = 0.092) and PFS (9.1 vs 8.7; HR [95% CI] = 0.85[0.63-1.15];p = 0.287). In left-sided 'only' tumours, the following outcomes for older (vs younger) patients were observed. For DC + anti-EGFR, PFS 9 versus 11.2 months; HR1.10 (95% CI 0.83-1.46); p = 0.52, OS 25.6 vs 30.3 HR 1.32 (95% CI 0.97-1.79), p = 0.086. For DC + anti-EGFR (vs DC alone), PFS and OS for younger patients were 11.9 vs 9.2 months HR 0.60 (95% CI 0.47-0.78) p < 0.001 and 24.1 versus 23.3 months HR 0.84 (95% CI 0.67-1.04), respectively. For older patients, PFS and OS were 13.1 versus 8.5 months, HR 0.51 (95% CI, 0.28-0.93), P = 0.027 and 26.3 versus 16.5 months HR 0.49 (95% CI, 0.28-0.85), respectively. There was no significant difference in toxicity among different age groups.

Conclusions: Older (vs younger) patients with mCRC RAS WT patients had comparable toxicity and efficacy with the addition of anti-EGFR agents to chemotherapy.

Citing Articles

Treatment approaches and survival outcomes in elderly colorectal cancer patients: a single-center comparative study.

Karaoglan B, Akkus E, Kayaalp M, Akyol C, Erkek A, Akbulut H Clin Transl Oncol. 2024; .

PMID: 39467964 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-024-03758-0.


Updates on the Management of Colorectal Cancer in Older Adults.

ODonnell C, Hubbard J, Jin Z Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(10).

PMID: 38791899 PMC: 11120096. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16101820.


Evidence-Based Care of Older Adults With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Insights From Landmark Clinical Trials.

Ioffe D, Dotan E J Clin Oncol. 2023; 41(34):5228-5236.

PMID: 37856768 PMC: 10691792. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.23.01337.


Update on the management of elderly patients with colorectal cancer.

Soler-Gonzalez G, Sastre-Valera J, Viana-Alonso A, Aparicio-Urtasun J, Garcia-Escobar I, Gomez-Espana M Clin Transl Oncol. 2023; 26(1):69-84.

PMID: 37498507 PMC: 10761480. DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03243-0.


An Update on the Role of Anti-EGFR in the Treatment of Older Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Rosati G, Montrone M, Pacilio C, Colombo A, Cicero G, Paragliola F J Clin Med. 2022; 11(23).

PMID: 36498683 PMC: 9739901. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11237108.