» Articles » PMID: 35029784

Cardiac Outpatient Care in a Digital Age: Remote Cardiology Clinic Visits in the Era of COVID-19

Overview
Publisher Current Science
Date 2022 Jan 14
PMID 35029784
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose Of Review: The worldwide pandemic caused by the novel coronavirus disease transformed healthcare in many ways. The impact of the pandemic was also noted in outpatient settings with various clinics adopting telehealth as the new normal. The goal of this paper is to investigate how the pandemic impacted the outpatient cardiology setting, specifically regarding the use of telehealth, and can the lessons learned from the adoption of telehealth in the backdrop of COVID-19 be applied to facilitate the wider and routine use of telemedicine in the outpatient cardiology clinic.

Recent Findings: Several studies have been conducted showcasing COVID-19's impact on the telehealth field of cardiology. Studies showed advantages for patients. Among these advantages are reduction in wait and travel time, easier medication reconciliation, and convenience. They also showed a general comfortability with the transition to telehealth among cardiologists. Furthermore, the adoption of telehealth in the outpatient cardiology setting, specifically with respect to the management of common cardiac conditions of congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and ischemic heart disease, revealed the potential of telemedicine to be used to adequately address these conditions. The transition to telehealth was not without its challenges, such as lack of a physical exam, barriers with certain patient populations to adopting the technology, and changes were noted in frequencies of medication ordering and cardiology-specific laboratory and diagnostic imaging. This transition to telehealth during the pandemic allowed for various studies to be conducted on how telehealth impacted the field of cardiology in the outpatient setting. While patient and practitioner advantages were revealed when compared to traditional outpatient cardiology visits, barriers to the adoption of the technology among specific patient populations were noted as were changes in practice among cardiologists. The use of telemedicine to adequately address common cardiac conditions was also shown. Further investigation into understanding the barriers of specific patient populations and overcoming these barriers, understanding the reason for the changes in practice of cardiologists with the use telemedicine, and investigating the use and incorporation of existing technology such as smart watches and patient portals or apps to make the transition to telehealth not only simpler, but to also optimize the cardiologist management of common cardiac conditions, have the potential to lead to the wider and routine use of telemedicine in the outpatient cardiology clinic.

Citing Articles

Cardiovascular Precision Medicine and Remote Intervention Trial Rationale and Design.

Reynolds D, Annunziato R, Sidhu J, Cotter G, Davison B, Takagi K J Clin Med. 2024; 13(20).

PMID: 39458224 PMC: 11509108. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13206274.


Technological Interventions to Implement Prevention and Health Promotion in Cardiovascular Patients.

Bashir A, Yetman A, Wehrmann M Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(20).

PMID: 39451470 PMC: 11507996. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12202055.


Physical Activity in Cancer Rehabilitation and Technology Acceptance: Results From the "Oncology in Motion" Project.

Biancuzzi H, Dal Mas F, Massaro M, Apicerni B, Cobianchi L, Bednarova R Transl Med UniSa. 2024; 26(2):122-130.

PMID: 39385795 PMC: 11460528. DOI: 10.37825/2239-9747.1063.


Advancing telemedicine in cardiology: A comprehensive review of evolving practices and outcomes in a postpandemic context.

Huerne K, Eisenberg M Cardiovasc Digit Health J. 2024; 5(2):96-110.

PMID: 38765624 PMC: 11096655. DOI: 10.1016/j.cvdhj.2024.02.001.


Pandemic-related practice changes and CVD risk management in community clinics.

Sheppler C, Larson A, Boston D, OConnor P, Cook N, McGrath B Am J Manag Care. 2024; 30(1):43-48.

PMID: 38271581 PMC: 10903331. DOI: 10.37765/ajmc.2024.89485.


References
1.
Moran A, Forouzanfar M, Roth G, Mensah G, Ezzati M, Flaxman A . The global burden of ischemic heart disease in 1990 and 2010: the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Circulation. 2014; 129(14):1493-501. PMC: 4181601. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.004046. View

2.
Hong Y, Cho J . Has the Digital Health Divide Widened? Trends of Health-Related Internet Use Among Older Adults From 2003 to 2011. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2016; 72(5):856-863. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbw100. View

3.
Choi N . Relationship between health service use and health information technology use among older adults: analysis of the US National Health Interview Survey. J Med Internet Res. 2011; 13(2):e33. PMC: 3221375. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1753. View

4.
Eurlings C, Boyne J, de Boer R, Brunner-La Rocca H . Telemedicine in heart failure-more than nice to have?. Neth Heart J. 2018; 27(1):5-15. PMC: 6311157. DOI: 10.1007/s12471-018-1202-5. View

5.
Singh A, Mountjoy N, McElroy D, Mittal S, Al Hemyari B, Coffey N . Patient Perspectives With Telehealth Visits in Cardiology During COVID-19: Online Patient Survey Study. JMIR Cardio. 2021; 5(1):e25074. PMC: 7834614. DOI: 10.2196/25074. View