» Articles » PMID: 35028542

Clinician Education Unlikely Effective for Guideline-adherent Medication Prescription in Low Back Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of RCTs

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2022 Jan 14
PMID 35028542
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Effectiveness of implementing interventions to optimise guideline-recommended medical prescription in low back pain is not well established.

Methods: A systematic review and random-effects meta-analyses for dichotomous outcomes with a Paule-Mandel estimator. Five databases and reference lists were searched from inception to 4 August 2021. Randomised controlled/clinical trials in adults with low back pain to optimise medication prescription were included. Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool and GRADE were implemented. The review was registered prospectively with PROSPERO (CRD42020219767).

Findings: Of 3352 unique records identified in the search, seven studies were included and five were eligible for meta-analysis (N=11339 participants). Six of seven studies incorporated clinician education, three studies included audit/feedback components and one study implemented changes in medical records systems. Via meta-analysis, we estimated a non-significant odds-ratio of 0·94 (95% CI (0·77; 1.16), I² = 0%; n=5 studies, GRADE: low) in favour of the intervention group. The main finding was robust to sensitivity analyses.

Interpretation: There is low quality evidence that existing interventions to optimise medication prescription or usage in back pain had no impact. Peer-to-peer education alone does not appear to lead to behaviour change. Organisational and policy interventions may be more effective.

Funding: This work was supported by internal institutional funding only.

Citing Articles

Understanding general practitioners' prescribing choices to patients with chronic low back pain: a discrete choice experiment.

Hamilton M, Lin C, Arora S, Harrison M, Tracy M, Nickel B Int J Clin Pharm. 2023; 46(1):111-121.

PMID: 37882955 PMC: 10831024. DOI: 10.1007/s11096-023-01649-y.

References
1.
Childs J, Fritz J, Wu S, Flynn T, Wainner R, Robertson E . Implications of early and guideline adherent physical therapy for low back pain on utilization and costs. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015; 15:150. PMC: 4393575. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-015-0830-3. View

2.
Dey P, Simpson C, Collins S, Hodgson G, Dowrick C, Simison A . Implementation of RCGP guidelines for acute low back pain: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Br J Gen Pract. 2004; 54(498):33-7. PMC: 1314775. View

3.
Baker S, RABIN A, Lantos G, Gallagher E . The effect of restricting the indications for lumbosacral spine radiography in patients with acute back symptoms. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987; 149(3):535-8. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.149.3.535. View

4.
Kovacs F, Fernandez C, Cordero A, Muriel A, Gonzalez-Lujan L, Gil Del Real M . Non-specific low back pain in primary care in the Spanish National Health Service: a prospective study on clinical outcomes and determinants of management. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006; 6:57. PMC: 1479820. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-57. View

5.
Suman A, Schaafsma F, van de Ven P, Slottje P, Buchbinder R, Van Tulder M . Effectiveness of a multifaceted implementation strategy compared to usual care on low back pain guideline adherence among general practitioners. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018; 18(1):358. PMC: 5948840. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-3166-y. View