» Articles » PMID: 35026479

Noninvasive Ventilation and High-flow Nasal Cannula in Patients with Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure by Covid-19: A Retrospective Study of the Feasibility, Safety and Outcomes

Abstract

Background: Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) and High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) are the main forms of treatment for acute respiratory failure. This study aimed to evaluate the effect, safety, and applicability of the NIV and HFNC in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) caused by COVID-19.

Methods: In this retrospective study, we monitored the effect of NIV and HFNC on the SpO and respiratory rate before, during, and after treatment, length of stay, rates of endotracheal intubation, and mortality in patients with AHRF caused by COVID-19. Additionally, data regarding RT-PCR from physiotherapists who were directly involved in assisting COVID-19 patients and non-COVID-19.

Results: 62.2 % of patients were treated with HFNC. ROX index increased during and after NIV and HFNC treatment (P < 0.05). SpO increased during NIV treatment (P < 0.05), but was not maintained after treatment (P = 0.17). In addition, there was no difference in the respiratory rate during or after the NIV (P = 0.95) or HFNC (P = 0.60) treatment. The mortality rate was 35.7 % for NIV vs 21.4 % for HFNC (P = 0.45), while the total endotracheal intubation rate was 57.1 % for NIV vs 69.6 % for HFNC (P = 0.49). Two adverse events occurred during treatment with NIV and eight occurred during treatment with HFNC. There was no difference in the physiotherapists who tested positive for SARS-COV-2 directly involved in assisting COVID-19 patients and non-COVID-19 ones (P = 0.81).

Conclusion: The application of NIV and HFNC in the critical care unit is feasible and associated with favorable outcomes. In addition, there was no increase in the infection of physiotherapists with SARS-CoV-2.

Citing Articles

Treatment outcomes and healthcare resource utilization in critically ill COVID-19 patients in Korea: A nationwide multicenter cohort study.

Kim T, Kim J, So M, Yeo H, Jang J, Park O Medicine (Baltimore). 2024; 103(46):e40505.

PMID: 39560591 PMC: 11575975. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040505.


Risk factors for intubation and mortality in patients treated with high flow nasal cannula due to COVID-19 infection. Survival Analysis Study in a Northern Mexican Population.

Luviano-Garcia J, Loose-Esparza A, Hernandez-Ruiz Y, Sanz-Sanchez M, Maheda-Garcia H, Sosa-Medellin M PLoS One. 2024; 19(3):e0296931.

PMID: 38489289 PMC: 10942070. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296931.


Ratio of oxygen saturation index for predicting high-flow nasal cannula outcomes in emergency department for COVID-19 patients with severe hypoxemia: A retrospective study.

Karam C, Oseili A, Shebbo F, Fakih M, El-Khatib M Turk J Emerg Med. 2024; 24(1):41-47.

PMID: 38343517 PMC: 10852130. DOI: 10.4103/tjem.tjem_159_23.


Efficiency of continuous positive airway pressure and high-flow nasal oxygen therapy in critically ill patients with COVID-19.

Manole C, Dediu-Anghel M, Baroiu L, Stefanopol I, Nechifor A, Niculet E J Int Med Res. 2024; 52(1):3000605231222151.

PMID: 38194495 PMC: 10777799. DOI: 10.1177/03000605231222151.


A Hybrid Decision Tree and Deep Learning Approach Combining Medical Imaging and Electronic Medical Records to Predict Intubation Among Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: Algorithm Development and Validation.

Nguyen K, Tandon P, Ghanavati S, Cheetirala S, Timsina P, Freeman R JMIR Form Res. 2023; 7:e46905.

PMID: 37883177 PMC: 10636624. DOI: 10.2196/46905.


References
1.
Grieco D, Bongiovanni F, Chen L, Menga L, Cutuli S, Pintaudi G . Respiratory physiology of COVID-19-induced respiratory failure compared to ARDS of other etiologies. Crit Care. 2020; 24(1):529. PMC: 7453378. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-03253-2. View

2.
Alhazzani W, Moller M, Arabi Y, Loeb M, Gong M, Fan E . Surviving Sepsis Campaign: guidelines on the management of critically ill adults with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Intensive Care Med. 2020; 46(5):854-887. PMC: 7101866. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-020-06022-5. View

3.
Gattinoni L, Chiumello D, Caironi P, Busana M, Romitti F, Brazzi L . COVID-19 pneumonia: different respiratory treatments for different phenotypes?. Intensive Care Med. 2020; 46(6):1099-1102. PMC: 7154064. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-020-06033-2. View

4.
Agarwal A, Basmaji J, Muttalib F, Granton D, Chaudhuri D, Chetan D . High-flow nasal cannula for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in patients with COVID-19: systematic reviews of effectiveness and its risks of aerosolization, dispersion, and infection transmission. Can J Anaesth. 2020; 67(9):1217-1248. PMC: 7294988. DOI: 10.1007/s12630-020-01740-2. View

5.
Ferioli M, Cisternino C, Leo V, Pisani L, Palange P, Nava S . Protecting healthcare workers from SARS-CoV-2 infection: practical indications. Eur Respir Rev. 2020; 29(155). PMC: 7134482. DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0068-2020. View