» Articles » PMID: 35024074

Impact of Direct Restorative Dental Materials on Surface Root Caries Treatment. Evidence Based and Current Materials Development: A Systematic Review

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2022 Jan 13
PMID 35024074
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This systematic review provides an update on the development and efficacy of direct restorative dental materials for root caries interventions from in vitro and clinical studies. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched using specific MeSH keywords. Full articles from September 1990 to October 2021 were collected. Additional articles were identified by reference retrieval and manual searching. Studies not related to restorative materials for root caries treatment, case reports, non-original articles, and/or articles not written in English were excluded. Bias risk assessment was performed for the clinical studies. Forty-two articles (eleven clinical studies and thirty-one in vitro studies) were included for analysis. Most in vitro studies indicated an excellent cariostatic effect of glass ionomer cement. Resin-modified glass ionomer restorations also presented reduced recurrent caries activity but had a lower efficacy than glass ionomer cement restorations. For composite resin restorations, the main material development strategies are to strengthen the tooth structure and integrate antimicrobial activity. The clinical studies offered limited data, so the most appropriate material for surface root caries treatment is still inconclusive. However, atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) is an alternative treatment for patients with limiting conditions. Further clinical studies are required to confirm the efficacy of bioactive materials.

Citing Articles

Effect of Different Pediatric Medications on RMGIC: A Comparative Study.

Qurishi A, Al Dira M, Sholan A, Abzoah S, Hakami M, Malhan E J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2025; 16(Suppl 4):S3185-S3187.

PMID: 39926938 PMC: 11805132. DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_688_24.


Surface Prereacted Glass Ionomer Varnish as a Multifaceted Anticaries Agent: Investigating its Inhibitory Effects on Demineralization and Biofilm Formation on Primary Tooth Enamel.

Fernandes R, Kumar S, Suvarna R, Shastry R, Sargod S, Bhat S Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024; 17(9):1049-1056.

PMID: 39664828 PMC: 11628684. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2923.


The development of resin-coating materials for enhancing elemental release of coated glass ionomer cements.

Panpisut P, Toneluck A, Khamsuk C, Channasanon S, Tanodekaew S, Monmaturapoj N Heliyon. 2024; 10(14):e34512.

PMID: 39113968 PMC: 11305317. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34512.


Long-term clinical comparison of a resin-based composite and resin modified glass ionomer in the treatment of cervical caries lesions.

Koc-Vural U, Kerimova-Kose L, Kiremitci A Odontology. 2024; 113(1):404-415.

PMID: 38837034 DOI: 10.1007/s10266-024-00958-6.

References
1.
Zhou W, Zhou X, Huang X, Zhu C, Weir M, Melo M . Antibacterial and remineralizing nanocomposite inhibit root caries biofilms and protect root dentin hardness at the margins. J Dent. 2020; 97:103344. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103344. View

2.
Hu J, Li Y, Smales R, Yip K . Restoration of teeth with more-viscous glass ionomer cements following radiation-induced caries. Int Dent J. 2003; 52(6):445-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1875-595x.2002.tb00640.x. View

3.
Hayes M, da Mata C, Cole M, McKenna G, Burke F, Allen P . Risk indicators associated with root caries in independently living older adults. J Dent. 2016; 51:8-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.05.006. View

4.
Ten Cate J, Buzalaf M . Fluoride Mode of Action: Once There Was an Observant Dentist . . . J Dent Res. 2019; 98(7):725-730. DOI: 10.1177/0022034519831604. View

5.
Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A . Long-term fluoride release from a glass ionomer cement, a compomer, and from experimental resin composites. Acta Odontol Scand. 2002; 60(2):93-7. DOI: 10.1080/000163502753509482. View