» Articles » PMID: 35022450

Characteristics and Possible Mechanisms of Formation of Microinversions Distinguishing Human and Chimpanzee Genomes

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2022 Jan 13
PMID 35022450
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Genomic inversions come in various sizes. While long inversions are relatively easy to identify by aligning high-quality genome sequences, unambiguous identification of microinversions is more problematic. Here, using a set of extra stringent criteria to distinguish microinversions from other mutational events, we describe microinversions that occurred after the divergence of humans and chimpanzees. In total, we found 59 definite microinversions that range from 17 to 33 nucleotides in length. In majority of them, human genome sequences matched exactly the reverse-complemented chimpanzee genome sequences, implying that the inverted DNA segment was copied precisely. All these microinversions were flanked by perfect or nearly perfect inverted repeats pointing to their key role in their formation. Template switching at inverted repeats during DNA replication was previously discussed as a possible mechanism for the microinversion formation. However, many of definite microinversions found by us cannot be easily explained via template switching owing to the combination of the short length and imperfect nature of their flanking inverted repeats. We propose a novel, alternative mechanism that involves repair of a double-stranded break within the inverting segment via microhomology-mediated break-induced replication, which can consistently explain all definite microinversion events.

Citing Articles

Analysis of pericentromere composition and structure elucidated the history of the Hieracium alpinum L. genome, revealing waves of transposable elements insertions.

Belyayev A, de la Pena B, Corrales S, Low S, Frejova B, Sejfova Z Mob DNA. 2024; 15(1):26.

PMID: 39548580 PMC: 11566620. DOI: 10.1186/s13100-024-00336-7.

References
1.
Walker C, Scally A, De Maio N, Goldman N . Short-range template switching in great ape genomes explored using pair hidden Markov models. PLoS Genet. 2021; 17(3):e1009221. PMC: 7954356. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009221. View

2.
Feuk L . Inversion variants in the human genome: role in disease and genome architecture. Genome Med. 2010; 2(2):11. PMC: 2847702. DOI: 10.1186/gm132. View

3.
Loytynoja A, Goldman N . Short template switch events explain mutation clusters in the human genome. Genome Res. 2017; 27(6):1039-1049. PMC: 5453318. DOI: 10.1101/gr.214973.116. View

4.
Lovett S . Template-switching during replication fork repair in bacteria. DNA Repair (Amst). 2017; 56:118-128. PMC: 5538584. DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2017.06.014. View

5.
Nachman M, Crowell S . Estimate of the mutation rate per nucleotide in humans. Genetics. 2000; 156(1):297-304. PMC: 1461236. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/156.1.297. View