» Articles » PMID: 35014906

Transarterial Embolization Modulates the Immune Response Within Target and Nontarget Hepatocellular Carcinomas in a Rat Model

Overview
Journal Radiology
Specialty Radiology
Date 2022 Jan 11
PMID 35014906
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background Transarterial embolization (TAE) is the most common treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, there remain limited data describing the influence of TAE on the tumor immune microenvironment. Purpose To characterize TAE-induced modulation of the tumor immune microenvironment in a rat model of HCC and identify factors that modulate this response. Materials and Methods TAE was performed on autochthonous HCCs induced in rats with use of diethylnitrosamine. CD3, CD4, CD8, and FOXP3 lymphocytes, as well as programmed cell death protein ligand-1 () expression, were examined in three cohorts: tumors from rats that did not undergo embolization (control), embolized tumors (target), and nonembolized tumors from rats that had a different target tumor embolized (nontarget). Differences in immune cell recruitment associated with embolic agent type (tris-acryl gelatin microspheres [TAGM] vs hydrogel embolics) and vascular location were examined in rat and human tissues. A generalized estimating equation model and , Mann-Whitney , and χ tests were used to compare groups. Results Cirrhosis-induced alterations in CD8, CD4, and CD25/CD4 lymphocytes were partially normalized following TAE (CD8: 38.4%, CD4: 57.6%, and CD25/CD4: 21.1% in embolized liver vs 47.7% [ = .02], 47.0% [ = .01], and 34.9% [ = .03], respectively, in cirrhotic liver [36.1%, 59.6%, and 4.6% in normal liver]). Embolized tumors had a greater number of CD3, CD4, and CD8 tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes relative to controls (191.4 cells/mm vs 106.7 cells/mm [ = .03]; 127.8 cells/mm vs 53.8 cells/mm [ < .001]; and 131.4 cells/mm vs 78.3 cells/mm [ = .01]) as well as a higher expression score (4.1 au vs 1.9 au [ < .001]). A greater number of CD3, CD4, and CD8 lymphocytes were found near TAGM versus hydrogel embolics (4.1 vs 2.0 [ = .003]; 3.7 vs 2.0 [ = .01]; and 2.2 vs 1.1 [ = .03], respectively). The number of lymphocytes adjacent to embolics differed based on vascular location (17.9 extravascular CD68 peri-TAGM cells vs 7.0 intravascular [ < .001]; 6.4 extravascular CD68 peri-hydrogel embolic cells vs 3.4 intravascular [ < .001]). Conclusion Transarterial embolization-induced dynamic alterations of the tumor immune microenvironment are influenced by underlying liver disease, embolic agent type, and vascular location. © RSNA, 2022 See also the editorials by Kennedy et al and by White in this issue.

Citing Articles

Transarterial Chemoembolization With or Without Systemic Therapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Comparative Study.

Guo C, Du W, Chen Y, Xiao W, Sun K, Shen Y Cancer Med. 2025; 14(3):e70633.

PMID: 39907261 PMC: 11795419. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.70633.


Efficacy and Safety of Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined with Lenvatinib Plus Programmed Death-1 Inhibitor for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with the Hepatic Vein and/or Inferior Vena Cava Tumor Thrombus.

Lin L, Nian Y, Lin X, Ke K, Yang W, Lin J Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2024; 48(3):314-326.

PMID: 39658748 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-024-03919-2.


The prognostic role of ACSL4 in postoperative adjuvant TACE-treated HCC: implications for therapeutic response and mechanistic insights.

Feng J, Bin J, Liao X, Wu Y, Tang Y, Lu P J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2024; 43(1):306.

PMID: 39563427 PMC: 11575417. DOI: 10.1186/s13046-024-03222-5.


Efficacy of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab Combined with Transarterial Chemoembolization for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Real-World Study.

Shen X, Zhang J, Liu J, Liu S, Shi H, Cheng Y J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2024; 11:1993-2003.

PMID: 39465042 PMC: 11505562. DOI: 10.2147/JHC.S478604.


Efficacy of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab-Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Sequential Therapy for Patients with Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Moriyama E, Shimose S, Niizeki T, Iwamoto H, Tanaka M, Shirono T Curr Oncol. 2024; 31(10):5821-5831.

PMID: 39451736 PMC: 11506552. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31100432.


References
1.
Takaki H, Imai N, Thomas C, Yamakado K, Yarmohammadi H, Ziv E . Changes in peripheral blood T-cell balance after percutaneous tumor ablation. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2017; 26(6):331-337. PMC: 9382907. DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2017.1310737. View

2.
Jin Y, Chung Y, Kim J, Park W, Lee D, Shim J . Predisposing factors of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence following complete remission in response to transarterial chemoembolization. Dig Dis Sci. 2013; 58(6):1758-65. DOI: 10.1007/s10620-013-2562-8. View

3.
Stampfl S, Bellemann N, Stampfl U, Radeleff B, Lopez-Benitez R, Sommer C . Inflammation and recanalization of four different spherical embolization agents in the porcine kidney model. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008; 19(4):577-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2008.01.011. View

4.
Falk P . Differences in vascular pattern between the spontaneous and the transplanted C3H mouse mammary carcinoma. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1982; 18(2):155-65. DOI: 10.1016/0277-5379(82)90059-1. View

5.
Hiroishi K, Eguchi J, Baba T, Shimazaki T, Ishii S, Hiraide A . Strong CD8(+) T-cell responses against tumor-associated antigens prolong the recurrence-free interval after tumor treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol. 2009; 45(4):451-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00535-009-0155-2. View