» Articles » PMID: 35008087

Ruxolitinib Re-Treatment in Patients with Myelofibrosis: Real-World Evidence on Patient Characteristics and Outcomes

Overview
Journal Acta Haematol
Specialty Hematology
Date 2022 Jan 10
PMID 35008087
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Ruxolitinib is an FDA-approved treatment of intermediate- and high-risk myelofibrosis. In the phase 3 COMFORT studies, ruxolitinib reduced spleen volume in patients with myelofibrosis, with a median time to response of 3 months. However, nearly 20% of patients discontinued by month 4 with few treatment options available following discontinuation of ruxolitinib treatment. In this study, 2 independent patient care data sources were queried (Cardinal Health Oncology Provider Extended Network [OPEN] and HealthCore Integrated Research Environment [HIRE®]), and a retrospective review of medical charts was conducted. Patients aged ≥18 years with a diagnosis of myelofibrosis (primary or secondary), use of ruxolitinib for myelofibrosis, and documented physician-directed ruxolitinib interruption were included. Among 26 included patients, pre-interruption median (interquartile range [IQR]) ruxolitinib treatment duration was 123 (57-391, OPEN) and 110 (37-148, HIRE) days. Half the patients interrupted treatment within 3 months, commonly for adverse events (42% and 71%, respectively). After restarting ruxolitinib, median (IQR) re-treatment duration was 196 (54-553) and 166 (108-262) days, respectively. Consistent with previous reports, symptoms and spleen size improved in (OPEN/HIRE) 45%/43% and 40%/33% of evaluable patients, respectively. Further studies investigating the management of dose modifications and interruptions are needed to optimize benefit from ruxolitinib therapy.

Citing Articles

Successful ruxolitinib rechallenge after fedratinib failure in a patient with overt myelofibrosis.

Pinczes L, Jona A, Mezei G, Kenyeres A, Vekszler P, Illes A Ann Hematol. 2024; 103(11):4817-4819.

PMID: 39090340 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-024-05825-6.


Management of Patients with Early Myelofibrosis: A Discussion of Best Practices.

Bose P Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2024; 19(3):111-119.

PMID: 38441783 PMC: 11127825. DOI: 10.1007/s11899-024-00729-8.

References
1.
Harrison C, Kiladjian J, Al-Ali H, Gisslinger H, Waltzman R, Stalbovskaya V . JAK inhibition with ruxolitinib versus best available therapy for myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366(9):787-98. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1110556. View

2.
Cervantes F, Vannucchi A, Kiladjian J, Al-Ali H, Sirulnik A, Stalbovskaya V . Three-year efficacy, safety, and survival findings from COMFORT-II, a phase 3 study comparing ruxolitinib with best available therapy for myelofibrosis. Blood. 2013; 122(25):4047-53. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2013-02-485888. View

3.
Palmer J, Mesa R . The role of fedratinib for the treatment of patients with primary or secondary myelofibrosis. Ther Adv Hematol. 2020; 11:2040620720925201. PMC: 7232117. DOI: 10.1177/2040620720925201. View

4.
Verstovsek S, Mesa R, Gotlib J, Levy R, Gupta V, Dipersio J . A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ruxolitinib for myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366(9):799-807. PMC: 4822164. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1110557. View

5.
Gisslinger H, Schalling M, Gisslinger B, Skrabs C, Mullauer L, Kralovics R . Restoration of response to ruxolitinib upon brief withdrawal in two patients with myelofibrosis. Am J Hematol. 2013; 89(3):344-6. DOI: 10.1002/ajh.23637. View