» Articles » PMID: 35004988

Comparative Study for Predictability of Type 1 Gastric Variceal Rebleeding After Endoscopic Variceal Ligation: High-frequency Intraluminal Ultrasound Study

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2022 Jan 10
PMID 35004988
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The efficacy of endoscopic ultrasonography for the follow-up of gastric varices treated with endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) has not been established.

Aim: To evaluate the diagnostic correlation of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and high-frequency intraluminal ultrasound (HFIUS) for type 1 gastric varices (GOV1) after EVL and to identify the predictability for rebleeding of EGD and HFIUS.

Methods: In liver cirrhosis patients with GOV1, we performed endoscopic follow-up using EGD and HFIUS synchronously after EVL for hemorrhage from GOV1. Endoscopic grading and red color signs were analyzed using EGD, and the largest variceal cross-sectional areas were measured using HFIUS. In addition, 1-year follow-up was performed. Variceal rebleeding was defined as the presence of hematemesis, hematochezia, or melena without other evidence of bleeding on endoscopic follow-up.

Results: In 26 patients with GOV1, variceal cross-sectional areas on HFIUS of GOV1 was poorly correlated with EGD grading of GOV1 ( = 0.36). In 17 patients who completed the 1-year follow-up, variceal cross-sectional areas on HFIUS was a good predictor of subsequent rebleeding, whereas EGD grading was not a predictor of subsequent rebleeding.

Conclusion: HFIUS measurement is more predictive of GOV1 rebleeding than EGD grading, so HFIUS measurement may be necessary for endoscopic follow-up after EVL in patients with GOV1.

Citing Articles

Endoscopic band ligation or endoscopic tissue adhesive injection in the treatment of gastric varices: Which is better?.

Yi L, Zhao S World J Gastroenterol. 2024; 30(21):2827-2828.

PMID: 38899333 PMC: 11185297. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i21.2827.

References
1.
Carneiro F, Retes F, Matuguma S, Albers D, Chaves D, Lera Dos Santos M . Role of EUS evaluation after endoscopic eradication of esophageal varices with band ligation. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016; 84(3):400-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.02.006. View

2.
Wang A, Li B, Zheng X, Shu X, Zhu X . Utility of endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of esophagogastric varices. Endosc Ultrasound. 2016; 5(4):218-24. PMC: 4989401. DOI: 10.4103/2303-9027.187840. View

3.
Stiegmann G, Goff J, Korula J, Lieberman D, Saeed Z, Reveille R . Endoscopic sclerotherapy as compared with endoscopic ligation for bleeding esophageal varices. N Engl J Med. 1992; 326(23):1527-32. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199206043262304. View

4.
Laine L, Migikovsky B, Sloane R, Garcia F . Endoscopic ligation compared with sclerotherapy for the treatment of bleeding esophageal varices. Ann Intern Med. 1993; 119(1):1-7. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-119-1-199307010-00001. View

5.
Masalaite L, Valantinas J, Stanaitis J . Endoscopic ultrasound findings predict the recurrence of esophageal varices after endoscopic band ligation: a prospective cohort study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2015; 50(11):1322-30. DOI: 10.3109/00365521.2015.1043640. View