» Articles » PMID: 35004591

Shifting From Tokenism to Meaningful Adolescent Participation in Research for Obesity Prevention: A Systematic Scoping Review

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2022 Jan 10
PMID 35004591
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Traditionally, adolescent participation in research has been tokenistic. Adolescents are rarely afforded the opportunity to influence decision-making in research designed to prevent obesity. Engaging adolescents in meaningful decision-making may enhance research translation. This review aimed to analyze the current modes and nature of adolescent participation in obesity prevention research decision-making. A systematic scoping review was conducted using Arksey and O'Malley's six-stage framework. Six major databases were searched for peer-reviewed primary research studies with adolescent participation related to obesity, physical activity, and diet. Modes of adolescent participation were categorized based on the Lansdown-UNICEF conceptual framework for measuring outcomes of adolescent participation. The framework outlines three modes of meaningful participation: (i) consultative, which involves taking opinions and needs into consideration; (ii) collaborative, where adolescents are partners in the decision-making process; and (iii) adolescent-led participation where adolescents have the capacity to influence the process and outcomes. The degree of involvement in research cycles was classified based on the National Health and Medical Research Council consumer engagement framework. Five stages of the research cycle were determined: identify, design and develop, conduct, analyze and disseminate. In total, 126 papers describing 71 unique studies were identified. Of these, 69% (49/71) took place in the USA, and 85% (52/61) were conducted in minority or underserved communities, while males were more likely to be under-represented. In 49% (35/71) of studies, participation was consultative and 9% (6/71) of studies involved an adolescent-led approach. Furthermore, 87% (62/71) of studies incorporated adolescent participation in one or more of the research cycle's formative phases, which involve eliciting views, opinions and idea generation. Only 11% of studies engaged adolescents in all five stages of the research cycle where adolescents could have more influence over the research process. Meaningful adolescent participation in the obesity prevention research cycle is limited. Empowering and mobilizing equal partnership with adolescents should be at the forefront of all adolescent-related obesity prevention research.

Citing Articles

Bridging the Gap in Policy Implementation through a Health Equity Lens: Insights from a 2-Year Study on Measurement Development.

McLoughlin G, Singleton C, Walsh-Bailey C, Inman R, Turner L Nutrients. 2024; 16(19).

PMID: 39408323 PMC: 11478687. DOI: 10.3390/nu16193357.


Young people's perspectives on policies to create healthier food environments in England.

Rinaldi C, McGill E, Petticrew M, Knai C, Egan M Health Promot Int. 2024; 39(5).

PMID: 39382386 PMC: 11462609. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daae133.


Experiences from youth advisors in chronic disease prevention research.

Mautner D, Valanju R, Al Hadaya I, Barani M, Cross A, McMahon E Res Involv Engagem. 2024; 10(1):56.

PMID: 38849959 PMC: 11157720. DOI: 10.1186/s40900-024-00585-z.


Involvement of children and young people in the conduct of health research: A rapid umbrella review.

Wyatt K, Bell J, Cooper J, Constable L, Siero W, Pozo Jeria C Health Expect. 2024; 27(3):e14081.

PMID: 38845155 PMC: 11156690. DOI: 10.1111/hex.14081.


Accelerating implementation of adolescent digital health prevention programs: analysis of insights from Australian stakeholders.

Raeside R, Todd A, Sim K, Kang M, Mihrshahi S, Gardner L Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1389739.

PMID: 38765492 PMC: 11100413. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1389739.


References
1.
Goh Y, Bogart L, Sipple-Asher B, Uyeda K, Hawes-Dawson J, Olarita-Dhungana J . Using community-based participatory research to identify potential interventions to overcome barriers to adolescents' healthy eating and physical activity. J Behav Med. 2009; 32(5):491-502. PMC: 2863037. DOI: 10.1007/s10865-009-9220-9. View

2.
Llaurado E, Aceves-Martins M, Tarro L, Papell-Garcia I, Puiggros F, Prades-Tena J . The "Som la Pera" intervention: sustainability capacity evaluation of a peer-led social-marketing intervention to encourage healthy lifestyles among adolescents. Transl Behav Med. 2018; 8(5):739-744. DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibx065. View

3.
Shah S, Foley B, Molinari I, Lim K, Shrewsbury V . The Students As LifeStyle Activists (SALSA) program. Br J Sports Med. 2017; 51(19):1445-1446. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-097219. View

4.
Cueva K, Speakman K, Neault N, Richards J, Lovato V, Parker S . Cultural Connectedness as Obesity Prevention: Indigenous Youth Perspectives on Feast for the Future. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2020; 52(6):632-639. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2019.11.009. View

5.
Saez L, Legrand K, Alleyrat C, Ramisasoa S, Langlois J, Muller L . Using facilitator-receiver peer dyads matched according to socioeconomic status to promote behaviour change in overweight adolescents: a feasibility study. BMJ Open. 2018; 8(6):e019731. PMC: 6020946. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019731. View