» Articles » PMID: 35004561

Consequences of a Diagnostic Label: A Systematic Scoping Review and Thematic Framework

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2022 Jan 10
PMID 35004561
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To develop a thematic framework for the range of consequences arising from a diagnostic label from an individual, family/caregiver, healthcare professional, and community perspective. Systematic scoping review of qualitative studies. We searched PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane, and CINAHL for primary studies and syntheses of primary studies that explore the consequences of labelling non-cancer diagnoses. Reference lists of included studies were screened, and forward citation searches undertaken. We included peer reviewed publications describing the perceived consequences for individuals labelled with a non-cancer diagnostic label from four perspectives: that of the individual, their family/caregiver, healthcare professional and/or community members. We excluded studies using hypothetical scenarios. Data extraction used a three-staged process: one third was used to develop a preliminary framework, the next third for framework validation, and the final third coded if thematic saturation was not achieved. Author themes and supporting quotes were extracted, and analysed from the perspective of individual, family/caregiver, healthcare professional, or community member. After deduplication, searches identified 7,379 unique articles. Following screening, 146 articles, consisting of 128 primary studies and 18 reviews, were included. The developed framework consisted of five overarching themes relevant to the four perspectives: (e.g., positive/negative psychological impact, social- and self-identity, stigma), (e.g., increased, decreased, relationship changes, professional interactions), (e.g., action and uncertainty), (e.g., beneficial or detrimental modifications), and . Perspectives of individuals were most frequently reported. This review developed and validated a framework of five domains of consequences following diagnostic labelling. Further research is required to test the external validity and acceptability of the framework for individuals and their family/caregiver, healthcare professionals, and community.

Citing Articles

Leveraging diagnosis and biometric data from the All of Us Research Program to uncover disparities in obesity diagnosis.

Arseniev-Koehler A, Tai-Seale M, Cene C, Grunvald E, Sitapati A Obes Pillars. 2025; 13:100165.

PMID: 40028616 PMC: 11872124. DOI: 10.1016/j.obpill.2025.100165.


Factors associated with receiving a Functional Disorder diagnostic label: A systematic review.

Tattan M, Rosmalen J, Hanssen D PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0317236.

PMID: 39869577 PMC: 11771906. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317236.


Functional Neurological Disorder and Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Complex and Potentially Significant Relationship.

Gonzalez-Herrero B, Happe F, Nicholson T, Morgante F, Pagonabarraga J, Deeley Q Brain Behav. 2024; 14(12):e70168.

PMID: 39705515 PMC: 11661563. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.70168.


Effectiveness and Characteristics of Work Participation Interventions for Adults with Musculoskeletal Upper Limb Conditions: A Systematic Review.

Newington L, Ceh D, Sandford F, Parsons V, Madan I J Occup Rehabil. 2024; .

PMID: 39636456 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-024-10251-6.


Improving delirium assessments in acute senior health: A quality improvement project for care of the older person.

Taylor C, Peakman G, Mackinnon L, Mohamadzade N, Han W, Mackie L BMC Geriatr. 2024; 24(1):781.

PMID: 39322946 PMC: 11423504. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-05273-x.


References
1.
Thompson R, Isaac C, Rowse G, Tooth C, Reuber M . What is it like to receive a diagnosis of nonepileptic seizures?. Epilepsy Behav. 2009; 14(3):508-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2008.12.014. View

2.
Armstrong N, Hilton P . Doing diagnosis: whether and how clinicians use a diagnostic tool of uncertain clinical utility. Soc Sci Med. 2014; 120:208-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.09.032. View

3.
Pedley R, Bee P, Berry K, Wearden A . Separating obsessive-compulsive disorder from the self. A qualitative study of family member perceptions. BMC Psychiatry. 2017; 17(1):326. PMC: 5590215. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-017-1470-4. View

4.
Harris J, Franck L, Green B, Michie S . The psychological impact of providing women with risk information for pre-eclampsia: a qualitative study. Midwifery. 2014; 30(12):1187-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2014.04.006. View

5.
Garand L, Lingler J, Conner K, Dew M . Diagnostic labels, stigma, and participation in research related to dementia and mild cognitive impairment. Res Gerontol Nurs. 2010; 2(2):112-21. PMC: 2864081. DOI: 10.3928/19404921-20090401-04. View