Consequences of a Diagnostic Label: A Systematic Scoping Review and Thematic Framework
Overview
Affiliations
To develop a thematic framework for the range of consequences arising from a diagnostic label from an individual, family/caregiver, healthcare professional, and community perspective. Systematic scoping review of qualitative studies. We searched PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane, and CINAHL for primary studies and syntheses of primary studies that explore the consequences of labelling non-cancer diagnoses. Reference lists of included studies were screened, and forward citation searches undertaken. We included peer reviewed publications describing the perceived consequences for individuals labelled with a non-cancer diagnostic label from four perspectives: that of the individual, their family/caregiver, healthcare professional and/or community members. We excluded studies using hypothetical scenarios. Data extraction used a three-staged process: one third was used to develop a preliminary framework, the next third for framework validation, and the final third coded if thematic saturation was not achieved. Author themes and supporting quotes were extracted, and analysed from the perspective of individual, family/caregiver, healthcare professional, or community member. After deduplication, searches identified 7,379 unique articles. Following screening, 146 articles, consisting of 128 primary studies and 18 reviews, were included. The developed framework consisted of five overarching themes relevant to the four perspectives: (e.g., positive/negative psychological impact, social- and self-identity, stigma), (e.g., increased, decreased, relationship changes, professional interactions), (e.g., action and uncertainty), (e.g., beneficial or detrimental modifications), and . Perspectives of individuals were most frequently reported. This review developed and validated a framework of five domains of consequences following diagnostic labelling. Further research is required to test the external validity and acceptability of the framework for individuals and their family/caregiver, healthcare professionals, and community.
Arseniev-Koehler A, Tai-Seale M, Cene C, Grunvald E, Sitapati A Obes Pillars. 2025; 13:100165.
PMID: 40028616 PMC: 11872124. DOI: 10.1016/j.obpill.2025.100165.
Factors associated with receiving a Functional Disorder diagnostic label: A systematic review.
Tattan M, Rosmalen J, Hanssen D PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0317236.
PMID: 39869577 PMC: 11771906. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317236.
Gonzalez-Herrero B, Happe F, Nicholson T, Morgante F, Pagonabarraga J, Deeley Q Brain Behav. 2024; 14(12):e70168.
PMID: 39705515 PMC: 11661563. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.70168.
Newington L, Ceh D, Sandford F, Parsons V, Madan I J Occup Rehabil. 2024; .
PMID: 39636456 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-024-10251-6.
Taylor C, Peakman G, Mackinnon L, Mohamadzade N, Han W, Mackie L BMC Geriatr. 2024; 24(1):781.
PMID: 39322946 PMC: 11423504. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-05273-x.