» Articles » PMID: 35004375

Utilization of Robotic Arm Assistance for Revision of Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Case Report

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2022 Jan 10
PMID 35004375
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: With increasing numbers of knee arthroplasty procedures being performed, revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains a challenge to orthopedic surgeons. The use of robotics in primary joint arthroplasty is also increasing due to better technology and surgeon familiarity. Robotic arms have the ability to execute bone cuts within 1 mm of a preoperative plan, can measure soft tissue gap tension, and can plan femoral and tibial augments and rotation. The use of robotic arm assistance for revision TKA, however, has not been documented in the literature.

Case Report: We present a case describing a novel technique in which the Mako robot (Stryker, Ft. Lauderdale, FL) was utilized for revision of a failed primary TKA secondary to aseptic loosening. The patient is a 68-year-old Caucasian male who underwent right revision TKA with robotic assistance. Stryker Triathlon TS implants were utilized with the use of both femoral and tibial cones and medial and lateral posterior femoral augments. He had satisfactory component alignment based on postoperative radiographs, and excellent clinical outcomes 6 months postoperatively.

Conclusion: The use of robotic arm assistance in revision TKA for failed primary TKA is a novel technique and resulted in excellent operative outcomes in this case. Further study should be done to confirm its use in revision TKA.

Citing Articles

Robotic assisted TKA may allow for smaller polyethylene liner sizes compared to manual TKA with simultaneous removal of Hardware.

Lachance A, Edelstein A, Shahsavarani S, Steika R, Stilwell M, Lutton J Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):2590.

PMID: 39833324 PMC: 11747172. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-87312-0.


Robotic-arm-assisted conversion of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty.

Magruder M, McClure T, Marchand K, Mont M, Marchand R J Orthop. 2024; 52:119-123.

PMID: 39035220 PMC: 11258387. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.03.024.


Comparison of the efficacy and safety of MAKO robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty versus conventional manual total knee arthroplasty in uncomplicated unilateral total knee arthroplasty a single-centre retrospective analysis.

Ma N, Sun P, Xin P, Zhong S, Xie J, Xiao L Int Orthop. 2024; 48(9):2351-2358.

PMID: 38874668 PMC: 11347482. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-024-06234-0.


Conversion of Patellofemoral Arthroplasty to Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Lachance A, Steika R, Lutton J, Austin D Arthroplast Today. 2023; 23:101215.

PMID: 37745967 PMC: 10514419. DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101215.


Surgical Technique: Robotic-Assisted 1.5-Stage Exchange Total Knee Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

Danoff J, Heimroth J, Willinger M, Trout S, Sodhi N Arthroplast Today. 2023; 21:101126.

PMID: 37234598 PMC: 10205596. DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101126.


References
1.
van der List J, Chawla H, Joskowicz L, Pearle A . Current state of computer navigation and robotics in unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016; 24(11):3482-3495. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-016-4305-9. View

2.
Boylan M, Suchman K, Vigdorchik J, Slover J, Bosco J . Technology-Assisted Hip and Knee Arthroplasties: An Analysis of Utilization Trends. J Arthroplasty. 2018; 33(4):1019-1023. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.033. View

3.
Khlopas A, Sodhi N, Sultan A, Chughtai M, Molloy R, Mont M . Robotic Arm-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018; 33(7):2002-2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.01.060. View

4.
Khlopas A, Chughtai M, Hampp E, Scholl L, Prieto M, Chang T . Robotic-Arm Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Demonstrated Soft Tissue Protection. Surg Technol Int. 2017; 30:441-446. View

5.
Hampp E, Chughtai M, Scholl L, Sodhi N, Bhowmik-Stoker M, Jacofsky D . Robotic-Arm Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Demonstrated Greater Accuracy and Precision to Plan Compared with Manual Techniques. J Knee Surg. 2018; 32(3):239-250. DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1641729. View