» Articles » PMID: 34998799

EEG and FMRI Coupling and Decoupling Based on Joint Independent Component Analysis (jICA)

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2022 Jan 9
PMID 34998799
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Meaningful integration of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and electroencephalography (EEG) requires knowing whether these measurements reflect the activity of the same neural sources, i.e., estimating the degree of coupling and decoupling between the neuroimaging modalities.

New Method: This paper proposes a method to quantify the coupling and decoupling of fMRI and EEG signals based on the mixing matrix produced by joint independent component analysis (jICA). The method is termed fMRI/EEG-jICA.

Results: fMRI and EEG acquired during a syllable detection task with variable syllable presentation rates (0.25-3 Hz) were separated with jICA into two spatiotemporally distinct components, a primary component that increased nonlinearly in amplitude with syllable presentation rate, putatively reflecting an obligatory auditory response, and a secondary component that declined nonlinearly with syllable presentation rate, putatively reflecting an auditory attention orienting response. The two EEG subcomponents were of similar amplitude, but the secondary fMRI subcomponent was ten folds smaller than the primary one.

Comparison To Existing Method: FMRI multiple regression analysis yielded a map more consistent with the primary than secondary fMRI subcomponent of jICA, as determined by a greater area under the curve (0.5 versus 0.38) in a sensitivity and specificity analysis of spatial overlap.

Conclusion: fMRI/EEG-jICA revealed spatiotemporally distinct brain networks with greater sensitivity than fMRI multiple regression analysis, demonstrating how this method can be used for leveraging EEG signals to inform the detection and functional characterization of fMRI signals. fMRI/EEG-jICA may be useful for studying neurovascular coupling at a macro-level, e.g., in neurovascular disorders.

Citing Articles

Integrating fMRI spatial network dynamics and EEG spectral power: insights into resting state connectivity.

Phadikar S, Pusuluri K, Iraji A, Calhoun V Front Neurosci. 2025; 19:1484954.

PMID: 39935841 PMC: 11810936. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1484954.


Maternal age differences in cognitive regulation: examination of associations and interactions between RSA and EEG frontoparietal alpha power coherence.

Christensen J, Bell M, Deater-Deckard K Front Hum Neurosci. 2023; 17:1188820.

PMID: 37694174 PMC: 10483125. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1188820.

References
1.
Vagharchakian L, Dehaene-Lambertz G, Pallier C, Dehaene S . A temporal bottleneck in the language comprehension network. J Neurosci. 2012; 32(26):9089-102. PMC: 6622343. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5685-11.2012. View

2.
Logothetis N . What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI. Nature. 2008; 453(7197):869-78. DOI: 10.1038/nature06976. View

3.
Nourski K, Brugge J . Representation of temporal sound features in the human auditory cortex. Rev Neurosci. 2011; 22(2):187-203. DOI: 10.1515/RNS.2011.016. View

4.
Escera C, Alho K, Schroger E, Winkler I . Involuntary attention and distractibility as evaluated with event-related brain potentials. Audiol Neurootol. 2000; 5(3-4):151-66. DOI: 10.1159/000013877. View

5.
Liebenthal E, Binder J, Spitzer S, Possing E, Medler D . Neural substrates of phonemic perception. Cereb Cortex. 2005; 15(10):1621-31. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhi040. View