» Articles » PMID: 34998068

Evaluation of Wear Behaviour of Various Occlusal Splint Materials and Manufacturing Processes

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2022 Jan 8
PMID 34998068
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the volumetric and vertical loss of occlusal splints manufactured by conventional (heat-cure), subtractive (CAD/CAM) and additive (3D-printing) methods.

Methods: Six occlusal splint materials were investigated (n = 126), using three manufacturing methods: heat-cured, CAD/CAM and 3D-printed built-in three different printing angles (0°,45°and 90°). Block-on-ring wear testing was performed with extracted human molars as the antagonist. All samples were tested with an applied force of 49N at 1 Hz and 60RPM in artificial saliva at 37 °C for six and 12 months. Scanning electron microscopy images were analysed to evaluate the wear on the tooth enamel and in the splint material. Volumetric and vertical wear loss were statistically analysed.

Results: The lowest volumetric and vertical loss was observed in CAD-CAM materials (6.44 ± 1.77 mm and 48.3 ± 7.14 μm) with no statistical significance to the heat-cured material (17.22 ± 9.23 mm and 148 ± 121.1 μm) after 12 months (p < 0.172). The mean volumetric loss of 3D printed materials ranged from 0.25 ± 0.15 mm to 0.29 ± 0.1 4mm with no statistical difference, whereas, the differences in vertical loss from 131.63 ± 44.1 μm to 493 ± 79.19 μm were statistically significant (p < 0.001). The highest vertical loss was observed in the KeySplint Soft 3D printed at 90° (385.35 ± 82.37 μm), whereas FreePrint Splint 2.0 with a build angle of 0° had the highest volumetric loss (204.59 ± 25.67 mm).

Conclusion: CAD-CAM material had the highest wear resistance followed by heat-cured material.KeySplint Soft and FreePrint Splint 2.0 3D printed materials would be preferred for patients that do not have severe bruxing episodes. No significant wear of human enamel after six and 12 months was observed under SEM for any tested materials.

Citing Articles

Wear Behavior and Water Sorption of Additively Manufactured Resin-Based Splint Materials.

Wulff J, Merle C, Hahnel S, Rosentritt M Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(23).

PMID: 39685316 PMC: 11643992. DOI: 10.3390/ma17235880.


Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of ABS-like Resin for Stereolithography Versus ABS for Fused Deposition Modeling in Three-Dimensional Printing Applications for Odontology.

Goncalves V, Vieira C, Simonassi N, Lopes F, Youssef G, Colorado H Polymers (Basel). 2024; 16(20).

PMID: 39458749 PMC: 11511427. DOI: 10.3390/polym16202921.


The Effect of Build Angle and Artificial Aging on the Accuracy of SLA- and DLP-Printed Occlusal Devices.

Saadat Sarmadi B, Schmidt F, Beuer F, Metin D, Simeon P, Nicic R Polymers (Basel). 2024; 16(12).

PMID: 38932064 PMC: 11207952. DOI: 10.3390/polym16121714.


Literature Review of an Anterior Deprogrammer to Determine the Centric Relation and Presentation of Cases.

Danko M, Chromy L, Ferencik N, Sestakova M, Kolembusova P, Balint T Bioengineering (Basel). 2023; 10(12).

PMID: 38135970 PMC: 10740564. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10121379.


Mechanical and chemical characterization of contemporary occlusal splint materials fabricated with different methods: a systematic review.

Benli M, Al-Haj Husain N, Ozcan M Clin Oral Investig. 2023; 27(12):7115-7141.

PMID: 37910242 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-023-05360-0.