» Articles » PMID: 34997942

Interacting Phenotypes and the Coevolutionary Process: Interspecific Indirect Genetic Effects Alter Coevolutionary Dynamics

Overview
Journal Evolution
Specialty Biology
Date 2022 Jan 8
PMID 34997942
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Coevolution occurs when species interact to influence one another's fitness, resulting in reciprocal evolutionary change. In many coevolving lineages, trait expression in one species is modified by the genotypes and phenotypes of the other, forming feedback loops reminiscent of models of intraspecific social evolution. Here, we adapt the theory of within-species social evolution, characterized by indirect genetic effects and social selection imposed by interacting individuals, to the case of interspecific interactions. In a trait-based model, we derive general expressions for multivariate evolutionary change in two species and the expected between-species covariance in evolutionary change when selection varies across space. We show that reciprocal interspecific indirect genetic effects can dominate the coevolutionary process and drive patterns of correlated evolution beyond what is expected from direct selection alone. In extreme cases, interspecific indirect genetic effects can lead to coevolution when selection does not covary between species or even when one species lacks genetic variance. Moreover, our model indicates that interspecific indirect genetic effects may interact in complex ways with cross-species selection to determine the course of coevolution. Importantly, our model makes empirically testable predictions for how different forms of reciprocal interactions contribute to the coevolutionary process.

Citing Articles

Genotypic variation in resource exchange, use, and production traits in the legume-rhizobia mutualism.

Calvert M, Hoque M, Wood C Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(11):e70245.

PMID: 39498196 PMC: 11532390. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70245.


Niche construction in quantitative traits: heritability and response to selection.

Fogarty L, Wade M Proc Biol Sci. 2022; 289(1976):20220401.

PMID: 35642369 PMC: 9156914. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2022.0401.


On the evolution of trophic position.

Moosmann M, Cuenca-Cambronero M, De Lisle S, Greenway R, Hudson C, Lurig M Ecol Lett. 2021; 24(12):2549-2562.

PMID: 34553481 PMC: 9290349. DOI: 10.1111/ele.13888.

References
1.
Barribeau S, Sadd B, du Plessis L, Schmid-Hempel P . Gene expression differences underlying genotype-by-genotype specificity in a host-parasite system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111(9):3496-501. PMC: 3948297. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1318628111. View

2.
Scharsack J, Gossens A, Franke F, Kurtz J . Excretory products of the cestode, Schistocephalus solidus, modulate in vitro responses of leukocytes from its specific host, the three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2013; 35(6):1779-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsi.2013.08.029. View

3.
Walsh M, Post D . The impact of intraspecific variation in a fish predator on the evolution of phenotypic plasticity and investment in sex in Daphnia ambigua. J Evol Biol. 2011; 25(1):80-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02403.x. View

4.
Brodie 3rd E, Ridenhour B . Reciprocal selection at the phenotypic interface of coevolution. Integr Comp Biol. 2011; 43(3):408-18. DOI: 10.1093/icb/43.3.408. View

5.
Foster K, Schluter J, Coyte K, Rakoff-Nahoum S . The evolution of the host microbiome as an ecosystem on a leash. Nature. 2017; 548(7665):43-51. PMC: 5749636. DOI: 10.1038/nature23292. View