» Articles » PMID: 34992050

A Prospective, First-in-human Use of the NeVa Mechanical Thrombectomy Device for Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes

Abstract

Background: There is no established technique for managing large thrombus burden (LTB) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

Aims: The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of the NeVa (Vesalio) mechanical thrombectomy device (MTD) in ACS patients with LTB.

Methods: Consecutive patients with ACS and LTB were treated with the NeVa MTD as the primary vessel recanalisation and thrombus removal modality, followed by conventional intervention. We further developed a bench model and applied to a subset of patients, a vacuum-assisted aspiration technique, exploiting 6 Fr-compatible conventional guiding catheter extensions, as an adjudicative manoeuvre to the use of stent-based MTD. A core laboratory reviewed the angiographic images for procedural complications, Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow, myocardial blush grade (MBG) and TIMI thrombus grade (TTG).

Results: Between November 2019 and March 2021, 61 patients underwent thrombectomy with the NeVa device. Non-flow limiting and reversible coronary spasm occurred in 14 (23%) patients. One patient (#10) suffered from side branch embolisation, which was successfully treated with the NeVa, triggering the development of a vacuum-assisted aspiration technique in a bench model, which was then applied to the subsequent 51 patients. No other device-related complications occurred. After NeVa use, TIMI flow <3 decreased from 68.3% at baseline to 10.3% (p<0.001), MBG <2 from 65% to 27.6% (p<0.001), TTG ≥3 from 96.7% to 43.2% (p<0.001), respectively.

Conclusions: In patients with LTB, the NeVa MTD was safe and associated with high rates of vessel recanalisation and thrombus removal. The concomitant use of vacuum-assisted aspiration has potential to improve the effectiveness and safety of the technique.

Citing Articles

The Use of Thrombectomy during Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Resurrecting an Old Concept in Contemporary Practice.

Satti Z, Omari M, Bawamia B, Cartlidge T, Egred M, Farag M J Clin Med. 2024; 13(8).

PMID: 38673564 PMC: 11050836. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13082291.


Initial experience with a novel stent-based mechanical thrombectomy device for management of acute myocardial infarction cases with large thrombus burden.

Zhi Y, Madanchi M, Cioffi G, Brunner J, Stutz L, Gnan E Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2024; 39(3):262-272.

PMID: 38642291 PMC: 11164735. DOI: 10.1007/s12928-024-00998-3.


Neurointerventional tools and techniques for coronary thrombus removal. A case-based review.

Klaudel J, Trenkner W, Pawlowski K, Surman D, Radowski P, Krasowski W J Cardiol Cases. 2022; 26(6):407-411.

PMID: 36506496 PMC: 9727564. DOI: 10.1016/j.jccase.2022.08.009.


Complex Coronary Interventions: Are We Reaching a Plateau?.

Franchin L, Boccuzzi G, Moniaci D, Iannaccone M J Pers Med. 2022; 12(8).

PMID: 36013247 PMC: 9409793. DOI: 10.3390/jpm12081298.

References
1.
Akpinar C, Ozdemir A, Gurkas E, Bilgic A, Aykac O, Inanc Y . Favorable first-pass recanalization rates with NeVa™ thrombectomy device in acute stroke patients: Initial clinical experience. Interv Neuroradiol. 2020; 27(1):107-113. PMC: 7903549. DOI: 10.1177/1591019920938223. View

2.
Frobert O, Lagerqvist B, Olivecrona G, Omerovic E, Gudnason T, Maeng M . Thrombus aspiration during ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369(17):1587-97. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1308789. View

3.
Khoo D, Lee J, Watson T, Ong P . The Solitaire device - on the cards for retrieval of recalcitrant thrombus in acute coronary syndrome. EuroIntervention. 2018; 14(18):e1834-e1835. DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00234. View

4.
Garcia-Garcia H, McFadden E, Farb A, Mehran R, Stone G, Spertus J . Standardized End Point Definitions for Coronary Intervention Trials: The Academic Research Consortium-2 Consensus Document. Eur Heart J. 2018; 39(23):2192-2207. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy223. View

5.
Chueh J, Puri A, Wakhloo A, Gounis M . Risk of distal embolization with stent retriever thrombectomy and ADAPT. J Neurointerv Surg. 2014; 8(2):197-202. PMC: 4752657. DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011491. View