» Articles » PMID: 34991494

Roles of Extended Human Papillomavirus Genotyping and Multiple Infections in Early Detection of Cervical Precancer and Cancer and HPV Vaccination

Overview
Journal BMC Cancer
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Oncology
Date 2022 Jan 7
PMID 34991494
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The aim of the study was to investigate the risk of human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping particularly vaccine genotypes and multiple infections for cervical precancer and cancer, which might contribute to developing genotype-specific screening strategy and assessing potential effects of HPV vaccine.

Methods: The HPV genotypes were identified using the Seq HPV assay on self-collected samples. Hierarchical ranking of each genotype was performed according to positive predictive value (PPV) for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3 or worse (CIN2+/CIN3+). Multivariate logistic regression model was used to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) of CIN2+ according to multiplicity of types and vaccine types.

Results: A total of 2811 HPV-positive women were analyzed. The five dominant HPV genotypes in high-grade lesions were 16/58/52/33/18. The overall ranking orders were HPV16/33/35/58/31/68/18/ 56/52/66/51/59/45/39 for CIN2+ and HPV16/33/31/58/45/66/52/18/35/56/51/68/59/39 for CIN3+. The risks of single infection versus co-infections with other types lower in the hierarchy having CIN2+ were not statistically significant for HPV16 (multiple infection vs. single infection: OR = 0.8, 95%CI = 0.6-1.1, P = 0.144) or other genotypes (P > 0.0036) after conservative Bonferroni correction. Whether HPV16 was present or not, the risks of single infection versus multiple infection with any number (2, ≥2, or ≥ 3) of types for CIN2+ were not significantly different. In addition, HPV31/33/45/52/58 covered by nonavalent vaccine added 27.5% of CIN2, 23.0% of CIN3, and 12.5% of cancer to the HPV16/18 genotyping. These genotype-groups were at significantly higher risks than genotypes not covered by nonavalent vaccine. Moreover, genotypes covered by nonavalent vaccine contributed to 85.2% of CIN2 lesions, 97.9% of CIN3 and 93.8% of cancers.

Conclusions: Partial extended genotyping such as HPV33/31/58 but not multiplicity of HPV infections could serve as a promising triage for HPV-positive self-samples. Moreover, incidence rates of cervical cancer and precancer were substantial attributable to HPV genotypes covered by current nonavalent vaccination.

Citing Articles

The impact of HPV/HIV co-infection on immunosuppression, HPV genotype, and cervical cancer biomarkers.

Swase T, Fasogbon I, Eseoghene I, Etukudo E, Mbina S, Joan C BMC Cancer. 2025; 25(1):202.

PMID: 39910495 PMC: 11796042. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-025-13516-2.


The Future of Cervical Cancer Screening.

Goldstein A, Gersh M, Skovronsky G, Moss C Int J Womens Health. 2024; 16:1715-1731.

PMID: 39464249 PMC: 11512781. DOI: 10.2147/IJWH.S474571.


Clinically validated HPV assays offer comparable long-term safety in primary cervical cancer screening: A 9-year follow-up of a population-based screening cohort.

Ostrbenk Valencak A, Kroon K, Fabjan D, Mlakar J, Seme K, Berkhof J Int J Cancer. 2024; 156(4):788-801.

PMID: 39315642 PMC: 11661515. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.35200.


The cervical cancer related distribution, coinfection and risk of 15 HPV types in Baoan, Shenzhen, in 2017-2023.

Li R, Meng W, Zuo Y, Xu Y, Wu S Virol J. 2024; 21(1):164.

PMID: 39075510 PMC: 11285127. DOI: 10.1186/s12985-024-02439-2.


Nonlinear relationship between viral load and TCT in single/multiple HPV52 infection.

Ma B, Zhou J, Zhou W, Ma Z, Chen J, Hu H Virol J. 2024; 21(1):90.

PMID: 38654353 PMC: 11036758. DOI: 10.1186/s12985-024-02356-4.


References
1.
Iacobone A, Bottari F, Radice D, Preti E, Franchi D, Urbinati A . Distribution of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Genotypes and Multiple Infections in Preneoplastic and Neoplastic Cervical Lesions of Unvaccinated Women: A Cross-sectional Study. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2019; 23(4):259-264. DOI: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000487. View

2.
Lei J, Ploner A, Elfstrom K, Wang J, Roth A, Fang F . HPV Vaccination and the Risk of Invasive Cervical Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020; 383(14):1340-1348. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1917338. View

3.
de Sanjose S, Quint W, Alemany L, Geraets D, Klaustermeier J, Lloveras B . Human papillomavirus genotype attribution in invasive cervical cancer: a retrospective cross-sectional worldwide study. Lancet Oncol. 2010; 11(11):1048-56. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70230-8. View

4.
Song F, Du H, Wang C, Huang X, Wu R . The effectiveness of HPV16 and HPV18 genotyping and cytology with different thresholds for the triage of human papillomavirus-based screening on self-collected samples. PLoS One. 2020; 15(6):e0234518. PMC: 7289398. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234518. View

5.
Belinson J, Wang G, Qu X, Du H, Shen J, Xu J . The development and evaluation of a community based model for cervical cancer screening based on self-sampling. Gynecol Oncol. 2014; 132(3):636-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.01.006. View