» Articles » PMID: 34990538

Effects of Anterior Plating on Achieving Clinically Meaningful Improvement Following Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

Overview
Journal Neurospine
Date 2022 Jan 6
PMID 34990538
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The clinical utility of anterior cervical plating for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures remains controversial. This study aims to compare the impact of cervical plating on achievement of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) up to 2 years following ACDF.

Methods: Patients undergoing primary, single-level ACDF procedures were grouped based on whether their procedure included application of an anterior cervical plate. Demographics, preoperative spinal diagnoses, operative characteristics, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were compared between plating groups. Achievement of an MCID was assessed using the following previously established thresholds: 12-item Short Form health survey physical component summary (SF-12 PCS) 8.1, visual analogue scale (VAS) neck 2.6, VAS arm 4.1, Neck Disability Index (NDI) 8.5. Rates of MCID achievement were compared between groups.

Results: The cohort included 192 patients of whom 102 received plating and 90 received no plating. Plating status was significantly associated with Charlson Comorbidity Index and insurance status. Operative duration and estimated blood loss were significantly greater for the plating group. Both groups demonstrated significant improvements at the majority of postoperative timepoints. Significant intergroup differences in PROM improvement were demonstrated for VAS neck and NDI at 6 weeks. Rates of MCID achievement differed significantly between groups for NDI at 6 weeks, and 12 weeks, and SF-12 PCS overall.

Conclusion: Patients improved significantly in terms of pain, disability and physical function, regardless of plating status, and with the exception of early neck pain and disability, these improvements were similar between groups. Patients that underwent plating as part of their ACDF procedure achieved an MCID for physical function at lower rates overall.

Citing Articles

A retrospective comparative analysis of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using stand-alone titanium cage versus cage and plate fixation in two-level cervical disc herniation.

Sever C, Kilinc B, Akpolat A, Bozkaya T, Kurtan A, Misir A J Orthop Surg Res. 2025; 20(1):256.

PMID: 40065413 PMC: 11892192. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-025-05654-x.


Radiographic Characteristics of Caudal Segment in Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: The Bony Buttress Formation.

Ham C, Kim J, Park Y, Kwon W, Moon H Neurospine. 2025; 21(4):1241-1250.

PMID: 39765269 PMC: 11744549. DOI: 10.14245/ns.2448626.313.


Comparing zero-profile and conventional cage and plate in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using finite-element modeling.

Ahn C, Kang S, Cho M, Kim S, Kim C, Han I Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):15766.

PMID: 37737299 PMC: 10516908. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-43086-x.


Self-locking stand-alone cage versus cage-plate fixation in monosegmental anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a minimum 2-year follow-up: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhang Y, Ju J, Wu J J Orthop Surg Res. 2023; 18(1):403.

PMID: 37269002 PMC: 10236847. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-03885-4.


The Effect of Subsidence on Segmental and Global Lordosis at Long-term Follow-up After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

Duey A, Gonzalez C, Geng E, Ferriter Jr P, Rosenberg A, Isleem U Neurospine. 2023; 19(4):927-934.

PMID: 36597631 PMC: 9816598. DOI: 10.14245/ns.2244750.375.

References
1.
Chen Y, Chen H, Wu X, Wang X, Lin W, Yuan W . Comparative analysis of clinical outcomes between zero-profile implant and cages with plate fixation in treating multilevel cervical spondilotic myelopathy: A three-year follow-up. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2016; 144:72-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.03.010. View

2.
Brozek J, Guyatt G, Schunemann H . How a well-grounded minimal important difference can enhance transparency of labelling claims and improve interpretation of a patient reported outcome measure. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006; 4:69. PMC: 1599713. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-69. View

3.
Nambiar M, Phan K, Cunningham J, Yang Y, Turner P, Mobbs R . Locking stand-alone cages versus anterior plate constructs in single-level fusion for degenerative cervical disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2017; 26(9):2258-2266. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-017-5015-9. View

4.
Vaishnav A, Saville P, McAnany S, Patel D, Haws B, Khechen B . Predictive Factors of Postoperative Dysphagia in Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019; 44(7):E400-E407. PMC: 11296389. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002865. View

5.
Overley S, Merrill R, Leven D, Meaike J, Kumar A, Qureshi S . A Matched Cohort Analysis Comparing Stand-Alone Cages and Anterior Cervical Plates Used for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. Global Spine J. 2017; 7(5):394-399. PMC: 5544154. DOI: 10.1177/2192568217699211. View