» Articles » PMID: 34988694

Efficiency of Cold Atmospheric Plasma, Cleaning Powders and Their Combination for Biofilm Removal on Two Different Titanium Implant Surfaces

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2022 Jan 6
PMID 34988694
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Biofilm removal is the decisive factor for the control of peri-implantitis. Cold atmospheric pressure plasma (CAP) can become an effective aid due to its ability to destroy and to inactivate bacterial biofilm residues. This study evaluated the cleaning efficiency of CAP, and air-polishing with glycine (APG) or erythritol (APE) containing powders alone or in combination with CAP (APG + CAP, APE + CAP) on sandblasted/acid etched, and anodised titanium implant surface.

Materials And Methods: On respective titanium discs, a 7-day ex vivo human biofilm was grown. Afterwards, the samples were treated with CAP, APG, APE, APG + CAP, and APE + CAP. Sterile and untreated biofilm discs were used for verification. Directly after treatment and after 5 days of incubation in medium at 37 °C, samples were prepared for examination by fluorescence microscopy. The relative biofilm fluorescence was measured for quantitative analyses.

Results: Air-polishing with or without CAP removed biofilms effectively. The combination of air-polishing with CAP showed the best cleaning results compared to single treatments, even on day 5. Immediately after treatment, APE + CAP showed insignificant higher cleansing efficiency than APG + CAP.

Conclusions: CAP supports mechanical cleansing and disinfection to remove and inactivate microbial biofilm on implant surfaces significantly. Here, the type of the powder was not important. The highest cleansing results were obtained on sandblasted/etched surfaces.

Clinical Relevance: Microbial residuals impede wound healing and re-osseointegration after peri-implantitis treatment. Air-polishing treatment removes biofilms very effectively, but not completely. In combination with CAP, microbial free surfaces can be achieved. The tested treatment regime offers an advantage during treatment of peri-implantitis.

Citing Articles

Optimizing Ultrasound Probe Disinfection for Healthcare-Associated Infection Control: A Comparative Analysis of Disinfectant Efficacy.

Ferrara G, Cangelosi G, Morales Palomares S, Mancin S, Melina M, Diamanti O Microorganisms. 2025; 12(12.

PMID: 39770597 PMC: 11676816. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12122394.


Effectiveness of cold atmospheric plasma in decontaminating enterococcus faecalis colonized collagen and PTFE membranes used in guided bone regeneration: a comparative in vitro investigation.

Weitkamp J, Hogreve A, Spille J, Veziroglu S, Aktas O, Florke C Int J Implant Dent. 2024; 10(1):53.

PMID: 39541013 PMC: 11564483. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-024-00576-5.


In-vitro biofilm removal from TiUnite® implant surface with an air polishing and two different plasma devices.

Haude S, Matthes R, Pitchika V, Holtfreter B, Schluter R, Gerling T BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):558.

PMID: 38741081 PMC: 11089677. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04230-9.


Nonthermal Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Treatment of Endosteal Implants for Osseointegration and Antimicrobial Efficacy: A Comprehensive Review.

Schafer S, Swain T, Parra M, Slavin B, Mirsky N, Nayak V Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(4).

PMID: 38671741 PMC: 11048570. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11040320.


Cold Atmospheric Plasma Improves the Colonization of Titanium with Primary Human Osteoblasts: An In Vitro Study.

Gund M, Naim J, Lehmann A, Hannig M, Lange M, Schindler A Biomedicines. 2024; 12(3).

PMID: 38540286 PMC: 10968577. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12030673.


References
1.
Canullo L, Penarrocha-Oltra D, Covani U, Orlato Rossetti P . Microbiologic and Clinical Findings of Implants in Healthy Condition and with Peri-Implantitis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015; 30(4):834-42. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.3947. View

2.
Madi M, Htet M, Zakaria O, AlAgl A, Kasugai S . Re-osseointegration of Dental Implants After Periimplantitis Treatments: A Systematic Review. Implant Dent. 2018; 27(1):101-110. DOI: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000712. View

3.
Htet M, Madi M, Zakaria O, Miyahara T, Xin W, Lin Z . Decontamination of Anodized Implant Surface With Different Modalities for Peri-Implantitis Treatment: Lasers and Mechanical Debridement With Citric Acid. J Periodontol. 2016; 87(8):953-61. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2016.150615. View

4.
Sahrmann P, Ronay V, Sener B, Jung R, Attin T, Schmidlin P . Cleaning potential of glycine air-flow application in an in vitro peri-implantitis model. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012; 24(6):666-70. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02445.x. View

5.
Claffey N, Clarke E, Polyzois I, Renvert S . Surgical treatment of peri-implantitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2008; 35(8 Suppl):316-32. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01277.x. View