» Articles » PMID: 34987795

Nasopharyngeal and Oropharyngeal Rinses with Neutral Electrolyzed Water Prevents COVID-19 in Front-line Health Professionals: A Randomized, Open-label, Controlled Trial in a General Hospital in Mexico City

Overview
Journal Biomed Rep
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2022 Jan 6
PMID 34987795
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The worldwide efforts that healthcare professionals are making in the COVID-19 pandemic is well known, and the high risk of illness and death that front-line staff experience on a daily basis is a reality, despite well-defined protocols for the use of personal protective equipment. In addition, it is well known that vaccination is still faraway to be achieved worldwide and that new variants are emerging, thus additional protective measures must be explored. A prospective open-label randomized controlled clinical trial was performed on front-line medical staff from the Dr. Enrique Cabrera General Hospital in México City to evaluate the effectiveness of nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal rinses with a neutral electrolyzed water, known as SES, to reduce the risk of COVID-19 disease among front-line, not vaccinated medical staff. A total of 170 volunteers were enrolled and equally divided in a control group and SES group. All members of the trial wore the adequate personal protection equipment at all times while performing their duties, as required by standard COVID-19 safety protocols. Additionally, the SES group participants followed a prophylactic protocol with SES (oral and nasal rinses, three times a day for 4 weeks). All participants were monitored for COVID-19 symptoms and disease in a time-frame of 4 weeks and the incidence of illness per group was registered. The relative risk of disease, associated with each treatment was calculated. The presence of COVID-19-positive cases, in the group that received the nasal and oral rinses with SES was 1.2%, while in the group that did not do the SES rinses (control group), it was 12.7% (P=0.0039 and RR=0.09405; 95% CI of 0.01231-0.7183). The prophylactic protocol was demonstrated as a protective factor, in more than 90%, for developing the disease, and without adverse effects. Nasal and oral rinses with SES may be an efficient alternative to reinforce the protective measures against COVID-19 disease and should be further investigated. The present clinical trial was retrospectively registered in the Cuban public registry of clinical trials (RPCEC) database (March 16, 2021; PREVECOVID-19: RPCEC00000357).

Citing Articles

Efficacy of neutral electrolyzed water vs. common topical antiseptics in the healing of full‑thickness burn: Preclinical trial in a mouse model.

Delgado-Enciso I, Aurelien-Cabezas N, Meza-Robles C, Walle-Guillen M, Hernandez-Fuentes G, Cabrera-Licona A Biomed Rep. 2024; 21(6):189.

PMID: 39479362 PMC: 11522847. DOI: 10.3892/br.2024.1877.


Washing Illness Away: A Systematic Review of the Impact of Nasal Irrigation and Spray on COVID-19.

Gandhi K, Paczkowski F, Sowerby L Laryngoscope. 2024; 135(2):517-528.

PMID: 39268910 PMC: 11725691. DOI: 10.1002/lary.31761.


Oral Hygiene With Neutral Electrolyzed Water and Systemic Therapy Increases Gastric Helicobacter pylori Eradication and Reduces Recurrence.

Urrutia-Baca V, Paz-Michel B, Calderon-Porras A, Valle J, Alvarez-Fernandez W, Mervitch-Sigal N Clin Exp Dent Res. 2024; 10(4):e927.

PMID: 38973212 PMC: 11228356. DOI: 10.1002/cre2.927.


Saline nasal irrigation and gargling in COVID-19: a multidisciplinary review of effects on viral load, mucosal dynamics, and patient outcomes.

Huijghebaert S, Parviz S, Rabago D, Baxter A, Chatterjee U, Khan F Front Public Health. 2023; 11:1161881.

PMID: 37397736 PMC: 10312243. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1161881.


Antimicrobial efficacy, mode of action and in vivo use of hypochlorous acid (HOCl) for prevention or therapeutic support of infections.

Boecker D, Zhang Z, Breves R, Herth F, Kramer A, Bulitta C GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2023; 18:Doc07.

PMID: 37034111 PMC: 10073986. DOI: 10.3205/dgkh000433.


References
1.
Delgado-Enciso I, Paz-Garcia J, Barajas-Saucedo C, Mokay-Ramirez K, Meza-Robles C, Lopez-Flores R . Safety and efficacy of a COVID-19 treatment with nebulized and/or intravenous neutral electrolyzed saline combined with usual medical care vs. usual medical care alone: A randomized, open-label, controlled trial. Exp Ther Med. 2021; 22(3):915. PMC: 8281484. DOI: 10.3892/etm.2021.10347. View

2.
Corman V, Landt O, Kaiser M, Molenkamp R, Meijer A, Chu D . Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR. Euro Surveill. 2020; 25(3). PMC: 6988269. DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045. View

3.
Bidra A, Pelletier J, Westover J, Frank S, Brown S, Tessema B . Rapid In-Vitro Inactivation of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Using Povidone-Iodine Oral Antiseptic Rinse. J Prosthodont. 2020; 29(6):529-533. PMC: 7300649. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.13209. View

4.
Morita C, Sano K, Morimatsu S, Kiura H, Goto T, Kohno T . Disinfection potential of electrolyzed solutions containing sodium chloride at low concentrations. J Virol Methods. 2000; 85(1-2):163-74. DOI: 10.1016/s0166-0934(99)00165-2. View

5.
Wolfel R, Corman V, Guggemos W, Seilmaier M, Zange S, Muller M . Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019. Nature. 2020; 581(7809):465-469. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2196-x. View