» Articles » PMID: 34983487

Influence of Coracoglenoid Space on Scapular Neck Fracture Stability: Biomechanical Study

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Orthopedics
Physiology
Date 2022 Jan 5
PMID 34983487
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The anatomical variation of the coracoglenoid space has the potential to influence the stability of scapular neck fractures. This paper aimed to investigate the mechanical mechanism underlying the influence of different coracoglenoid space types on scapular neck fractures by morphometric analysis and biomechanical experiments.

Methods: The morphology of 68 dried scapulae (left: 36; right: 32) was studied. Two variables, the length of the coracoglenoid distance (CGD) and the coracoglenoid notch (CGN), were measured. The distribution of CGN/CGD × 100% was used to identify the morphology of the coracoglenoid space. Each specimen was tested for failure under static axial compression loading. The average failure load, stiffness, and energy were calculated.

Results: Two coracoglenoid space types were identified. The incidence of Type I (''hook'' shape) was 53%, and that of Type II (''square bracket'' shape) was 47%. The CGD and CGN were significantly higher for type I than type II (13.81 ± 0.74 mm vs. 11.50 ± 1.03 mm, P < 0.05; 4.74 ± 0.45 mm vs. 2.61 ± 0.45 mm, P < 0.05). The average maximum failure load of the two types was 1270.82 ± 318.85 N and 1529.18 ± 467.29 N, respectively (P = 0.011). The stiffness and energy were significantly higher for type II than type I (896.75 ± 281.14 N/mm vs. 692.91 ± 217.95 N/mm, P = 0.001; 2100.38 ± 649.54 N × mm vs. 1712.71 ± 626.02 N × mm, P = 0.015).

Conclusions: There was great interindividual variation in the anatomical morphology of the coracoglenoid space. Type I (hook-like) spaces bore lower forces, were less stiff, and bore less energy, which may constitute an anatomical predisposition to scapular neck fractures.

Citing Articles

Treatment options and outcomes for delayed scapular anatomical neck fractures: a case report and review of the literature.

Amouzadeh Omrani F, Khak M, Tavakoli Darestani R, Afzal S, Baroutkoub M, Aghaalikhani M J Med Case Rep. 2024; 18(1):94.

PMID: 38459542 PMC: 10924315. DOI: 10.1186/s13256-024-04424-3.


Finite element analysis of a novel anatomical locking plate for scapular neck fracture.

Xiang F, Xiao Y, Wei D, Tan X, He S, Luo L J Orthop Surg Res. 2023; 18(1):262.

PMID: 37004037 PMC: 10067195. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-03743-3.

References
1.
Ogawa K, Inokuchi W, Matsumura N . Delayed surgery for displaced fracture of the anatomic neck and spine of the scapula: a case report and literature review. JSES Open Access. 2019; 2(3):169-173. PMC: 6334870. DOI: 10.1016/j.jses.2018.06.001. View

2.
Mohammed H, Skalski M, Patel D, Tomasian A, Schein A, White E . Coracoid Process: The Lighthouse of the Shoulder. Radiographics. 2016; 36(7):2084-2101. DOI: 10.1148/rg.2016160039. View

3.
Roe S . Biomechanics of Fracture Fixation. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2019; 50(1):1-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.cvsm.2019.08.009. View

4.
Bi A, Kane L, Butler B, Stover M . Outcomes following extra-articular fractures of the scapula: A systematic review. Injury. 2020; 51(3):602-610. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.01.036. View

5.
Sulkar H, Tashjian R, Chalmers P, Henninger H . Mechanical testing of scapular neck fracture fixation using a synthetic bone model. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2018; 61:64-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.11.007. View