» Articles » PMID: 34976907

The Associations of Active Travel to School With Physical Activity and Screen Time Among Adolescents: Do Individual and Parental Characteristics Matter?

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2022 Jan 3
PMID 34976907
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Little is known about the relationship of active travel to school (ATS) with physical activity (PA) and screen time (ST) by individual and parental characteristics among adolescents, especially in China. To address the research gap, this study aimed to explore the difference of sex, age, living environment, parental occupation and education level in the relationship of ATS with PA and ST among students of grades 7-12 (aged 10-18 years) using cross-sectional data. In 13 cities of Hubei province, China, students from 39 public schools were recruited to engage in the survey. In total, 5,898 students (response rate = 89.6%) were invited into this study. Participants were required to report their ATS (including its types), PA and ST as well as sociodemographic information using a validated questionnaire. Descriptive analyses were used to report the information of all variables. Regression models were used to analyse the relationships of ATS and its types with PA and ST. In a total of 4,128 participants (boys: 50.9%; younger adolescents: 61.9%) included in the final analysis, the proportion of those with ATS was 47.3%. Regarding the types of ATS, walking accounted for over 30%, while cycling was 13.2%. Participants with ATS were more likely to have sufficient PA (OR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.14-1.39), especially among boys, younger adolescents and those with lower parental education level. However, ATS was not associated with ST (OR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.86-1.01). Participants with cycling had a higher odds ratio of being physically active (OR for cycling = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.27-1.70; OR for walking = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.06-1.32). The association of ATS types with PA and ST differed by gender, age, living environment and parental educational level as well as occupations. ATS may be a useful approach to increase PA among adolescents, but this should be explained by individual and parental characteristics.

Citing Articles

Association of physical activity, screen time and sleep with substance use in children and adolescents: a large sample cross-sectional study.

Su H, Lyu D, Huang K, Yan J Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1432710.

PMID: 39484350 PMC: 11524877. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1432710.


Exploring the sports participation, muscle-strengthening exercise and active commuting with comorbidity of depression and anxiety among Chinese children and adolescents: a cross-sectional study.

Feng B, Luo F, Chen Y, Zhao Y, Wang P, Bao R Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1338190.

PMID: 39257409 PMC: 11385614. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1338190.


24-hour movement behaviours and self-rated health in Chinese adolescents: a questionnaire-based survey in Eastern China.

Shi G, Liang C, Zang W, Bao R, Yan J, Zhou L PeerJ. 2023; 11:e16174.

PMID: 37842041 PMC: 10576499. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.16174.


Energy Expenditure, Dietary Energy Intake, and Nutritional Supplements in Adolescent Volleyball Athletes versus Nonathletic Controls.

Bell M, Ghatora R, Retsidou M, Chatzigianni E, Klentrou P Nutrients. 2023; 15(7).

PMID: 37049627 PMC: 10096554. DOI: 10.3390/nu15071788.


Movement behaviours and anxiety symptoms in Chinese college students: A compositional data analysis.

Chao L, Ma R, Jiang W Front Psychol. 2022; 13:952728.

PMID: 36186352 PMC: 9520661. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.952728.


References
1.
Chaput J, Leduc G, Boyer C, Belanger P, LeBlanc A, Borghese M . Objectively measured physical activity, sedentary time and sleep duration: independent and combined associations with adiposity in canadian children. Nutr Diabetes. 2014; 4:e117. PMC: 4079924. DOI: 10.1038/nutd.2014.14. View

2.
Panter J, Jones A, van Sluijs E . Environmental determinants of active travel in youth: a review and framework for future research. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008; 5:34. PMC: 2483993. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-5-34. View

3.
Nilsson A, Andersen L, Ommundsen Y, Froberg K, Sardinha L, Piehl-Aulin K . Correlates of objectively assessed physical activity and sedentary time in children: a cross-sectional study (The European Youth Heart Study). BMC Public Health. 2009; 9:322. PMC: 2745386. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-322. View

4.
Carson V, Hunter S, Kuzik N, Gray C, Poitras V, Chaput J . Systematic review of sedentary behaviour and health indicators in school-aged children and youth: an update. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016; 41(6 Suppl 3):S240-65. DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2015-0630. View

5.
Hallal P, Andersen L, Bull F, Guthold R, Haskell W, Ekelund U . Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Lancet. 2012; 380(9838):247-57. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60646-1. View