» Articles » PMID: 34975046

Predictive Factors for High-flow Nasal Cannula Failure in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure in an Intensive Care Unit

Overview
Journal Lung India
Specialty Pulmonary Medicine
Date 2022 Jan 3
PMID 34975046
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Objective: High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), a relatively new technique in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF), is gaining popularity in intensive care units (ICUs). Our study aims to identify the predictive factors for failure of HFNC.

Materials And Methods: This is a 5-year retrospective cohort study in patients with AHRF using HFNC in an ICU of a regional hospital in Hong Kong. The primary outcome is to identify the predictive factors for failure of HFNC which is defined as escalation of treatment to noninvasive ventilation, mechanical ventilation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or death.

Results: Of the 124 ICU patients with AHRF, 69 (55.65%) failed in the use of HFNC. The patients failing HFNC had higher Acute physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV scores, lower Glasgow Coma Scale scores, lower platelet counts and serum sodium levels upon ICU admission, and higher pH on day of HFNC commencement. They had higher respiratory rates before HFNC and higher heart rates before and 1 h after HFNC. The respiratory rate-oxygenation (ROX) index which is defined as a ratio of SpO/FiO to respiratory rate was significantly lower in the failure group 1 h and 12 h after HFNC. By multivariate binary logistic regression, failure of HFNC is associated with lower ROX index at 12 h after HFNC.

Conclusion: ROX index at 12 h serves as a valuable tool to monitor the responsiveness to HFNC treatment. Close monitoring is required to identify patient failing using HFNC.

Citing Articles

The Relationship of Respiratory Rate-Oxygenation (ROX) and Modified ROX Index With High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy in COVID-19 Patients: An Observational Pilot Study.

Karim H, Bharadwaj A, Mujahid O, Borthakur M, Panda C, Kalbande J Cureus. 2023; 14(12):e32900.

PMID: 36699780 PMC: 9869921. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.32900.


Predictive factors for high-flow nasal cannula failure: Taking a closer look.

Nair A, Esquinas A Lung India. 2022; 39(4):388.

PMID: 35848679 PMC: 9390295. DOI: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_51_22.

References
1.
Kang B, Koh Y, Lim C, Huh J, Baek S, Han M . Failure of high-flow nasal cannula therapy may delay intubation and increase mortality. Intensive Care Med. 2015; 41(4):623-32. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-015-3693-5. View

2.
Dysart K, Miller T, Wolfson M, Shaffer T . Research in high flow therapy: mechanisms of action. Respir Med. 2009; 103(10):1400-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2009.04.007. View

3.
Masip J, Roque M, Sanchez B, Fernandez R, Subirana M, Exposito J . Noninvasive ventilation in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2005; 294(24):3124-30. DOI: 10.1001/jama.294.24.3124. View

4.
Esteban A, Anzueto A, Frutos F, Alia I, Brochard L, Stewart T . Characteristics and outcomes in adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation: a 28-day international study. JAMA. 2002; 287(3):345-55. DOI: 10.1001/jama.287.3.345. View

5.
Zhao H, Wang H, Sun F, Lyu S, An Y . High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy is superior to conventional oxygen therapy but not to noninvasive mechanical ventilation on intubation rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2017; 21(1):184. PMC: 5508784. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-017-1760-8. View