» Articles » PMID: 34970159

Are Young Swimmers Short and Middle Distances Energy Cost Sex-Specific?

Overview
Journal Front Physiol
Date 2021 Dec 31
PMID 34970159
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study assessed the energy cost in swimming (C) during short and middle distances to analyze the sex-specific responses of C during supramaximal velocity and whether body composition account to the expected differences. Twenty-six swimmers (13 men and 13 women: 16.7 ± 1.9 vs. 15.5 ± 2.8 years old and 70.8 ± 10.6 vs. 55.9 ± 7.0 kg of weight) performed maximal front crawl swimming trials in 50, 100, and 200 m. The oxygen uptake ( O) was analyzed along with the tests (and post-exercise) through a portable gas analyser connected to a respiratory snorkel. Blood samples were collected before and after exercise (at the 1st, 3rd, 5th, and 7th min) to determine blood lactate concentration [La]. The lean mass of the trunk (LM ), upper limb (LM ), and lower limb (LM ) was assessed using dual X-ray energy absorptiometry. Anaerobic energy demand was calculated from the phosphagen and glycolytic components, with the first corresponding to the fast component of the O bi-exponential recovery phase and the second from the 2.72 ml × kg equivalent for each 1.0 mmol × L [La] variation above the baseline value. The aerobic demand was obtained from the integral value of the O vs. swimming time curve. The C was estimated by the rate between total energy releasing (in Joules) and swimming velocity. The sex effect on C for each swimming trial was verified by the two-way ANOVA (Bonferroni test) and the relationships between LM , LM , and LM to C were tested by Pearson coefficient. The C was higher for men than women in 50 (1.8 ± 0.3 vs. 1.3 ± 0.3 kJ × m), 100 (1.4 ± 0.1 vs. 1.0 ± 0.2 kJ × m), and 200 m (1.0 ± 0.2 vs. 0.8 ± 0.1 kJ × m) with < 0.01 for all comparisons. In addition, C differed between distances for each sex ( < 0.01). The regional LM (26.5 ± 3.6 vs. 20.1 ± 2.6 kg), LM (6.8 ± 1.0 vs. 4.3 ± 0.8 kg), and LM (20.4 ± 2.6 vs. 13.6 ± 2.5 kg) for men vs. women were significantly correlated to C in 50 ( = 0.73), 100 ( = 0.61), and 200 m ( = 0.60, < 0.01). Therefore, the increase in C with distance is higher for men than women and is determined by the lean mass in trunk and upper and lower limbs independent of the differences in body composition between sexes.

Citing Articles

Endurance in Long-Distance Swimming and the Use of Nutritional Aids.

Miguel-Ortega A, Calleja-Gonzalez J, Mielgo-Ayuso J Nutrients. 2024; 16(22).

PMID: 39599736 PMC: 11597455. DOI: 10.3390/nu16223949.


Sex Differences in the Energy System Contribution during Sprint Exercise in Speed-Power and Endurance Athletes.

Archacki D, Zielinski J, Ciekot-Soltysiak M, Zarebska E, Kusy K J Clin Med. 2024; 13(16).

PMID: 39200953 PMC: 11355823. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13164812.


Oxygen uptake kinetics and biological age in relation to pulling force and 400-m front crawl performance in young swimmers.

Strzala M, Sokolowski K, Wadrzyk L, Staszkiewicz R, Kryst L, Zeglen M Front Physiol. 2023; 14:1229007.

PMID: 37869719 PMC: 10587410. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1229007.


Body Composition Relationship to Performance, Cardiorespiratory Profile, and Tether Force in Youth Trained Swimmers.

Espada M, Ferreira C, Gamonales J, Hernandez-Beltran V, Massini D, Macedo A Life (Basel). 2023; 13(9).

PMID: 37763210 PMC: 10532630. DOI: 10.3390/life13091806.


Editorial: Training, performance and rehabilitation in water-based sports.

Joulia F, Daly D, Guimard A Front Physiol. 2023; 14:1279596.

PMID: 37727655 PMC: 10505717. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1279596.


References
1.
Capelli C, Pendergast D, Termin B . Energetics of swimming at maximal speeds in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1998; 78(5):385-93. DOI: 10.1007/s004210050435. View

2.
Koons N, Suresh M, Schlotman T, Convertino V . Interrelationship Between Sex, Age, Blood Volume, and Vo. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2019; 90(4):362-368. DOI: 10.3357/AMHP.5255.2019. View

3.
Almeida T, Pessoa Filho D, Espada M, Reis J, Sancassani A, Massini D . Physiological Responses During High-Intensity Interval Training in Young Swimmers. Front Physiol. 2021; 12:662029. PMC: 8281220. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.662029. View

4.
Russ D, Lanza I, Rothman D, Kent-Braun J . Sex differences in glycolysis during brief, intense isometric contractions. Muscle Nerve. 2005; 32(5):647-55. DOI: 10.1002/mus.20396. View

5.
Maud P, Shultz B . Gender comparisons in anaerobic power and anaerobic capacity tests. Br J Sports Med. 1986; 20(2):51-4. PMC: 1478312. DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.20.2.51. View