Functional Connectivity and Speech Entrainment Speech Entrainment Improves Connectivity Between Anterior and Posterior Cortical Speech Areas in Non-fluent Aphasia

Overview

Journal Neurorehabil Neural Repair

Publisher Sage Publications

Specialties Neurology
Rehabilitation Medicine

Date 2021 Dec 30

PMID 34968159

Citations 4

Authors

Lisa Johnson

Grigori Yourganov

Alexandra Basilakos

Roger David Newman-Norlund

Helga Thors

Lynsey Keator

Chris Rorden

Leonardo Bonilha

Julius Fridriksson

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Speech entrainment (SE), the online mimicking of an audio-visual speech model, has been shown to increase speech fluency in individuals with non-fluent aphasia. One theory that may explain why SE improves speech output is that it synchronizes functional connectivity between anterior and posterior language regions to be more similar to that of neurotypical speakers.

Objectives: The present study tested this by measuring functional connectivity between 2 regions shown to be necessary for speech production, and their right hemisphere homologues, in 24 persons with aphasia compared to 20 controls during both free (spontaneous) speech and SE.

Methods: Regional functional connectivity in participants with aphasia were normalized to the control data. Two analyses were then carried out: (1) normalized functional connectivity was compared between persons with aphasia and controls during free speech and SE and (2) stepwise linear models with leave-one-out cross-validation including normed functional connectivity during both tasks and proportion damage to the left hemisphere as independent variables were created for each language score.

Results: Left anterior-posterior functional connectivity and left posterior to right anterior functional connectivity were significantly more similar to connectivity of the control group during SE compared to free speech. Additionally, connectivity during free speech was more associated with language measures than connectivity during SE.

Conclusions: Overall, these results suggest that SE promotes normalization of functional connectivity (i.e., return to patterns observed in neurotypical controls), which may explain why individuals with non-fluent aphasia produce more fluent speech during SE compared to spontaneous speech.

Citing Articles

Physiological Entrainment: A Key Mind-Body Mechanism for Cognitive, Motor and Affective Functioning, and Well-Being.

Barbaresi M, Nardo D, Fagioli S Brain Sci. 2025; 15(1).

PMID: 39851371 PMC: 11763407. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci15010003.

Synergistic effects of combined motor and language interventions on stroke rehabilitation: a holistic approach.

Saber-Moghadam R, Zeinalzadeh A, Jamali J, Farzadfard M, Sobhani-Rad D Front Hum Neurosci. 2024; 18:1454491.

PMID: 39640515 PMC: 11617182. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1454491.

The Aphasia Recovery Cohort, an open-source chronic stroke repository.

Gibson M, Newman-Norlund R, Bonilha L, Fridriksson J, Hickok G, Hillis A Sci Data. 2024; 11(1):981.

PMID: 39251640 PMC: 11384737. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-024-03819-7.

Remapping and Reconnecting the Language Network after Stroke.

Tilton-Bolowsky V, Stockbridge M, Hillis A Brain Sci. 2024; 14(5).

PMID: 38790398 PMC: 11117613. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14050419.

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-stroke non-fluent aphasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Cheng J, Jiang Y, Rao T, Yang Y, Liu Y, Zhan Y Front Neurol. 2024; 15:1348695.

PMID: 38751884 PMC: 11094331. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1348695.

References

Hickok G . Computational neuroanatomy of speech production. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012; 13(2):135-45. PMC: 5367153. DOI: 10.1038/nrn3158. View

Houde J, Nagarajan S . Speech production as state feedback control. Front Hum Neurosci. 2011; 5:82. PMC: 3200525. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00082. View

Kleim J, Jones T . Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008; 51(1):S225-39. DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/018). View

Kell C, Neumann K, Behrens M, von Gudenberg A, Giraud A . Speaking-related changes in cortical functional connectivity associated with assisted and spontaneous recovery from developmental stuttering. J Fluency Disord. 2017; 55:135-144. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2017.02.001. View

Henry M, Hubbard H, Grasso S, Mandelli M, Wilson S, Sathishkumar M . Retraining speech production and fluency in non-fluent/agrammatic primary progressive aphasia. Brain. 2018; 141(6):1799-1814. PMC: 5972572. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awy101. View

Guenther F, Ghosh S, Tourville J . Neural modeling and imaging of the cortical interactions underlying syllable production. Brain Lang. 2005; 96(3):280-301. PMC: 1473986. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2005.06.001. View

Fridriksson J, Basilakos A, Hickok G, Bonilha L, Rorden C . Speech entrainment compensates for Broca's area damage. Cortex. 2015; 69:68-75. PMC: 4522328. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.04.013. View

Behroozmand R, Phillip L, Johari K, Bonilha L, Rorden C, Hickok G . Sensorimotor impairment of speech auditory feedback processing in aphasia. Neuroimage. 2017; 165:102-111. PMC: 5732035. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.10.014. View

Venezia J, Fillmore P, Matchin W, Isenberg A, Hickok G, Fridriksson J . Perception drives production across sensory modalities: A network for sensorimotor integration of visual speech. Neuroimage. 2015; 126:196-207. PMC: 4733636. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.038. View

10.

Taub E, Uswatte G, Mark V, Morris D . The learned nonuse phenomenon: implications for rehabilitation. Eura Medicophys. 2006; 42(3):241-56. View

11.

Bonilha L, Hillis A, Wilmskoetter J, Hickok G, Basilakos A, Munsell B . Neural structures supporting spontaneous and assisted (entrained) speech fluency. Brain. 2019; 142(12):3951-3962. PMC: 6885692. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awz309. View

12.

Yakunina N, Kim T, Tae W, Kim S, Nam E . Applicability of the Sparse Temporal Acquisition Technique in Resting-State Brain Network Analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015; 37(3):515-20. PMC: 7960128. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4554. View

13.

Ewald A, Aristei S, Nolte G, Abdel Rahman R . Brain Oscillations and Functional Connectivity during Overt Language Production. Front Psychol. 2012; 3:166. PMC: 3369188. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00166. View

14.

Guenther F, Hampson M, Johnson D . A theoretical investigation of reference frames for the planning of speech movements. Psychol Rev. 1998; 105(4):611-33. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.105.4.611-633. View

15.

Vlooswijk M, Jansen J, Majoie H, Hofman P, de Krom M, Aldenkamp A . Functional connectivity and language impairment in cryptogenic localization-related epilepsy. Neurology. 2010; 75(5):395-402. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181ebdd3e. View

16.

Faria A, Joel S, Zhang Y, Oishi K, van Zjil P, Miller M . Atlas-based analysis of resting-state functional connectivity: evaluation for reproducibility and multi-modal anatomy-function correlation studies. Neuroimage. 2012; 61(3):613-21. PMC: 3358461. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.078. View

17.

Wolf S, LeCraw D, Barton L, Jann B . Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Exp Neurol. 1989; 104(2):125-32. DOI: 10.1016/s0014-4886(89)80005-6. View

18.

Brett M, Leff A, Rorden C, Ashburner J . Spatial normalization of brain images with focal lesions using cost function masking. Neuroimage. 2001; 14(2):486-500. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0845. View

19.

Fridriksson J, Fillmore P, Guo D, Rorden C . Chronic Broca's Aphasia Is Caused by Damage to Broca's and Wernicke's Areas. Cereb Cortex. 2014; 25(12):4689-96. PMC: 4669036. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhu152. View

20.

Okada K, Hickok G . Left posterior auditory-related cortices participate both in speech perception and speech production: Neural overlap revealed by fMRI. Brain Lang. 2006; 98(1):112-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2006.04.006. View