» Articles » PMID: 34966664

Texture Analysis of Fat-Suppressed T2-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Use of Machine Learning to Discriminate Nasal and Paranasal Sinus Small Round Malignant Cell Tumors

Overview
Journal Front Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2021 Dec 30
PMID 34966664
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: We used texture analysis and machine learning (ML) to classify small round cell malignant tumors (SRCMTs) and Non-SRCMTs of nasal and paranasal sinus on fat-suppressed T2 weighted imaging (Fs-T2WI).

Materials: Preoperative MRI scans of 164 patients from 1 January 2018 to 1 January 2021 diagnosed with SRCMTs and Non-SRCMTs were included in this study. A total of 271 features were extracted from each regions of interest. Datasets were randomly divided into two sets, including a training set (∼70%) and a test set (∼30%). The Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) and principal component analysis (PCA) methods were performed to reduce dimensions, and the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), Kruskal-Wallis (KW), and Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) and Relief were performed for feature selections. Classifications were performed using 10 ML classifiers. Results were evaluated using a leave one out cross-validation analysis.

Results: We compared the AUC of all pipelines on the validation dataset with FeAture Explorer (FAE) software. The pipeline using a PCC dimension reduction, relief feature selection, and gaussian process (GP) classifier yielded the highest area under the curve (AUC) using 15 features. When the "one-standard error" rule was used, FAE also produced a simpler model with 13 features, including S(5,-5)SumAverg, S(3,0)InvDfMom, Skewness, WavEnHL_s-3, Horzl_GlevNonU, Horzl_RLNonUni, 135dr_GlevNonU, WavEnLL_s-3, Teta4, Teta2, S(5,5)DifVarnc, Perc.01%, and WavEnLH_s-2. The AUCs of the training/validation/test datasets were 1.000/0.965/0.979, and the accuracies, sensitivities, and specificities were 0.890, 0.880, and 0.920, respectively. The best algorithm was GP whose AUCs of the training/validation/test datasets by the two-dimensional reduction methods and four feature selection methods were greater than approximately 0.800. Especially, the AUCs of different datasets were greater than approximately 0.900 using the PCC, RFE/Relief, and GP algorithms.

Conclusions: We demonstrated the feasibility of combining artificial intelligence and the radiomics from Fs-T2WI to differentially diagnose SRCMTs and Non-SRCMTs. This non-invasive approach could be very promising in clinical oncology.

Citing Articles

Artificial intelligence and MRI in sinonasal tumors discrimination: where do we stand?.

Gravante G, Arosio A, Curti N, Biondi R, Berardi L, Gandolfi A Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024; 282(3):1557-1566.

PMID: 39719474 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-024-09169-9.


Classification of nasal polyps and inverted papillomas using CT-based radiomics.

Guo M, Zang X, Fu W, Yan H, Bao X, Li T Insights Imaging. 2023; 14(1):188.

PMID: 37955767 PMC: 10643706. DOI: 10.1186/s13244-023-01536-0.


Radiomics analysis based on CT for the prediction of pulmonary metastases in ewing sarcoma.

Liu Y, Yin P, Cui J, Sun C, Chen L, Hong N BMC Med Imaging. 2023; 23(1):147.

PMID: 37784073 PMC: 10544364. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-023-01077-4.


Deep learning-enhanced radiomics for histologic classification and grade stratification of stage IA lung adenocarcinoma: a multicenter study.

Pei G, Wang D, Sun K, Yang Y, Tang W, Sun Y Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1224455.

PMID: 37546407 PMC: 10400286. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1224455.


A Scoping Review of Artificial Intelligence Research in Rhinology.

Osie G, Darbari Kaul R, Alvarado R, Katsoulotos G, Rimmer J, Kalish L Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2023; 37(4):438-448.

PMID: 36895144 PMC: 10273866. DOI: 10.1177/19458924231162437.


References
1.
White M, Zhang Y, Robinson R . Evaluating tumors and tumorlike lesions of the nasal cavity, the paranasal sinuses, and the adjacent skull base with diffusion-weighted MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2006; 30(3):490-5. DOI: 10.1097/00004728-200605000-00023. View

2.
Weber A, Stanton A . Malignant tumors of the paranasal sinuses: radiologic, clinical, and histopathologic evaluation of 200 cases. Head Neck Surg. 1984; 6(3):761-76. DOI: 10.1002/hed.2890060310. View

3.
Fetit A, Novak J, Peet A, Arvanitits T . Three-dimensional textural features of conventional MRI improve diagnostic classification of childhood brain tumours. NMR Biomed. 2015; 28(9):1174-84. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3353. View

4.
Gillies R, Kinahan P, Hricak H . Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data. Radiology. 2015; 278(2):563-77. PMC: 4734157. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015151169. View

5.
Song Y, Zhang J, Zhang Y, Hou Y, Yan X, Wang Y . FeAture Explorer (FAE): A tool for developing and comparing radiomics models. PLoS One. 2020; 15(8):e0237587. PMC: 7431107. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237587. View