» Articles » PMID: 34964930

The Do's, Don'ts and Don't Knows of Redressing Differential Attainment Related to Race/ethnicity in Medical Schools

Overview
Publisher Ubiquity Press
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2021 Dec 29
PMID 34964930
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Systematic and structural inequities in power and privilege create differential attainment whereby differences in average levels of performance are observed between students from different socio-demographic groups. This paper reviews the international evidence on differential attainment related to ethnicity/race in medical school, drawing together the key messages from research to date to provide guidance for educators to operationalize and enact change and identify areas for further research.

Methods: Authors first identified areas of conceptual importance within differential attainment (learning, assessment, and systems/institutional factors) which were then the focus of a targeted review of the literature on differential attainment related to ethnicity/race in medical education and, where available and relevant, literature from higher education more generally. Each author then conducted a review of the literature and proposed guidelines based on their experience and research literature. The guidelines were iteratively reviewed and refined between all authors until we reached consensus on the Do's, Don'ts and Don't Knows.

Results: We present 13 guidelines with a summary of the research evidence for each. Guidelines address assessment practices (assessment design, assessment formats, use of assessments and post-hoc analysis) and educational systems and cultures (student experience, learning environment, faculty diversity and diversity practices).

Conclusions: Differential attainment related to ethnicity/race is a complex, systemic problem reflective of unequal norms and practices within broader society and evident throughout assessment practices, the learning environment and student experiences at medical school. Currently, the strongest empirical evidence is around assessment processes themselves. There is emerging evidence of minoritized students facing discrimination and having different learning experiences in medical school, but more studies are needed. There is a pressing need for research on how to effectively redress systemic issues within our medical schools, particularly related to inequity in teaching and learning.

Citing Articles

Differential attainment at national selection for higher surgical training: a retrospective cohort study.

Ellis R, Al-Tawarah Y, Brennan P, Lee A, Hines J, Cleland J BMJ Open. 2025; 15(1):e091796.

PMID: 39880430 PMC: 11781144. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091796.


Student Medical Education Masterclasses: Diversifying the Academic Pipeline.

Collin V, Brown M, Alsafi Z, Sylvan N, Parekh R, Kumar S Clin Teach. 2024; 22(1):e13850.

PMID: 39710512 PMC: 11663725. DOI: 10.1111/tct.13850.


Exploring the educational journey: perspectives of ethnic minority GP-trainees in Dutch GP-specialty training - a qualitative interview study.

van Moppes N, Nasori M, Jorissen A, van Es J, Bont J, Visser M Int J Equity Health. 2024; 23(1):253.

PMID: 39609695 PMC: 11603862. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-024-02341-x.


Recommendations to address and research systemic bias in assessment: perspectives from directors of research in medical education.

Chen F, OBrien C, Blanco M, Huggett K, Jeffe D, Pusic M Med Educ Online. 2024; 29(1):2396166.

PMID: 39244774 PMC: 11382691. DOI: 10.1080/10872981.2024.2396166.


Inclusive Research in Medical Education: Strategies to Improve Scholarship and Cultivate Scholars.

Hauer K, Minhas P, McDonald J, Perez S, Phinney L, Lucey C J Gen Intern Med. 2024; 40(1):177-184.

PMID: 39103603 PMC: 11780237. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-024-08827-2.


References
1.
Frost H, Regehr G . "I am a doctor": negotiating the discourses of standardization and diversity in professional identity construction. Acad Med. 2013; 88(10):1570-7. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182a34b05. View

2.
Chesser A, Cameron H, Evans P, Cleland J, Boursicot K, Mires G . Sources of variation in performance on a shared OSCE station across four UK medical schools. Med Educ. 2009; 43(6):526-32. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03370.x. View

3.
Chisholm L, Jackson K, Davidson H, Churchwell A, Fleming A, Drolet B . Evaluation of Racial Microaggressions Experienced During Medical School Training and the Effect on Medical Student Education and Burnout: A Validation Study. J Natl Med Assoc. 2020; 113(3):310-314. DOI: 10.1016/j.jnma.2020.11.009. View

4.
Williams R, Klamen D, McGaghie W . Cognitive, social and environmental sources of bias in clinical performance ratings. Teach Learn Med. 2003; 15(4):270-92. DOI: 10.1207/S15328015TLM1504_11. View

5.
Stegers-Jager K, Themmen A, Cohen-Schotanus J, Steyerberg E . Predicting performance: relative importance of students' background and past performance. Med Educ. 2015; 49(9):933-45. DOI: 10.1111/medu.12779. View