Modeling of CO Adsorption Capacity by Porous Metal Organic Frameworks Using Advanced Decision Tree-based Models

Overview

Journal Sci Rep

Specialty Science

Date 2021 Dec 29

PMID 34963681

Citations 7

Authors

Jafar Abdi

Fahimeh Hadavimoghaddam

Masoud Hadipoor

Abdolhossein Hemmati-Sarapardeh

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

In recent years, metal organic frameworks (MOFs) have been distinguished as a very promising and efficient group of materials which can be used in carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects. In the present study, the potential ability of modern and powerful decision tree-based methods such as Categorical Boosting (CatBoost), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Random Forest (RF) was investigated to predict carbon dioxide adsorption by 19 different MOFs. Reviewing the literature, a comprehensive databank was gathered including 1191 data points related to the adsorption capacity of different MOFs in various conditions. The inputs of the implemented models were selected as temperature (K), pressure (bar), specific surface area (m/g) and pore volume (cm/g) of the MOFs and the output was CO uptake capacity (mmol/g). Root mean square error (RMSE) values of 0.5682, 1.5712, 1.0853, and 1.9667 were obtained for XGBoost, CatBoost, LightGBM, and RF models, respectively. The sensitivity analysis showed that among all investigated parameters, only the temperature negatively impacts the CO adsorption capacity and the pressure and specific surface area of the MOFs had the most significant effects. Among all implemented models, the XGBoost was found to be the most trustable model. Moreover, this model showed well-fitting with experimental data in comparison with different isotherm models. The accurate prediction of CO adsorption capacity by MOFs using the XGBoost approach confirmed that it is capable of handling a wide range of data, cost-efficient and straightforward to apply in environmental applications.

Citing Articles

A data driven machine learning approach for predicting and optimizing sulfur compound adsorption on metal organic frameworks.

Shayanmehr M, Aarabi S, Ghaemi A, Hemmati A Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):3138.

PMID: 39856195 PMC: 11761476. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-86689-2.

Predictive modeling of CO solubility in piperazine aqueous solutions using boosting algorithms for carbon capture goals.

Mohammadi M, Larestani A, Schaffie M, Hemmati-Sarapardeh A, Ranjbar M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):22112.

PMID: 39333217 PMC: 11436830. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-73070-y.

Mid-temperature CO Adsorption over Different Alkaline Sorbents Dispersed over Mesoporous AlO.

Tsiotsias A, Georgiadis A, Charisiou N, Hussien A, Dabbawala A, Polychronopoulou K ACS Omega. 2024; 9(10):11305-11320.

PMID: 38496972 PMC: 10938334. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.3c07204.

Estimation of the flow rate of pyrolysis gasoline, ethylene, and propylene in an industrial olefin plant using machine learning approaches.

Abdi J, Mazloom G, Hadavimoghaddam F, Hemmati-Sarapardeh A, Esmaeili-Faraj S, Bolhasani A Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):14081.

PMID: 37640807 PMC: 10462638. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-41273-4.

Compositional modeling of gas-condensate viscosity using ensemble approach.

Rezaei F, Akbari M, Rafiei Y, Hemmati-Sarapardeh A Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):9659.

PMID: 37316502 PMC: 10267160. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-36122-3.

References

Liu J, Thallapally P, Peter McGrail B, Brown D, Liu J . Progress in adsorption-based CO2 capture by metal-organic frameworks. Chem Soc Rev. 2011; 41(6):2308-22. DOI: 10.1039/c1cs15221a. View

Eddaoudi M, Kim J, Rosi N, Vodak D, Wachter J, OKeeffe M . Systematic design of pore size and functionality in isoreticular MOFs and their application in methane storage. Science. 2002; 295(5554):469-72. DOI: 10.1126/science.1067208. View

Ockwig N, Delgado-Friedrichs O, OKeeffe M, Yaghi O . Reticular chemistry: occurrence and taxonomy of nets and grammar for the design of frameworks. Acc Chem Res. 2005; 38(3):176-82. DOI: 10.1021/ar020022l. View

Abdi J, Vossoughi M, Mahmoodi N, Alemzadeh I . Synthesis of amine-modified zeolitic imidazolate framework-8, ultrasound-assisted dye removal and modeling. Ultrason Sonochem. 2017; 39:550-564. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.04.030. View

Wang Z, Cohen S . Postsynthetic modification of metal-organic frameworks. Chem Soc Rev. 2009; 38(5):1315-29. DOI: 10.1039/b802258p. View

Rowsell J, Spencer E, Eckert J, Howard J, Yaghi O . Gas adsorption sites in a large-pore metal-organic framework. Science. 2005; 309(5739):1350-4. DOI: 10.1126/science.1113247. View

Babarao R, Jiang J . Diffusion and separation of CO2 and CH4 in silicalite, C168 schwarzite, and IRMOF-1: a comparative study from molecular dynamics simulation. Langmuir. 2008; 24(10):5474-84. DOI: 10.1021/la703434s. View

Akazawa M, Hashimoto K, Katsuhiko N, Kaname Y . Machine learning approach for the prediction of postpartum hemorrhage in vaginal birth. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):22620. PMC: 8604915. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-02198-y. View

Liang L, Liu C, Jiang F, Chen Q, Zhang L, Xue H . Carbon dioxide capture and conversion by an acid-base resistant metal-organic framework. Nat Commun. 2017; 8(1):1233. PMC: 5663901. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-01166-3. View

10.

Mohammadi F, Samaei M, Azhdarpoor A, Teiri H, Badeenezhad A, Rostami S . Modelling and Optimizing Pyrene Removal from the Soil by Phytoremediation using Response Surface Methodology, Artificial Neural Networks, and Genetic Algorithm. Chemosphere. 2019; 237:124486. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124486. View

11.

Fan M, Hu J, Cao R, Ruan W, Wei X . A review on experimental design for pollutants removal in water treatment with the aid of artificial intelligence. Chemosphere. 2018; 200:330-343. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.02.111. View

12.

Bac B, Nguyen H, Thao N, Duyen L, Hanh V, Dung N . Performance evaluation of nanotubular halloysites from weathered pegmatites in removing heavy metals from water through novel artificial intelligence-based models and human-based optimization algorithm. Chemosphere. 2021; 282:131012. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131012. View

13.

Abdi J, Hadipoor M, Hadavimoghaddam F, Hemmati-Sarapardeh A . Estimation of tetracycline antibiotic photodegradation from wastewater by heterogeneous metal-organic frameworks photocatalysts. Chemosphere. 2021; 287(Pt 2):132135. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132135. View

14.

Yildirim Y, Bayramoglu M . Adaptive neuro-fuzzy based modelling for prediction of air pollution daily levels in city of Zonguldak. Chemosphere. 2005; 63(9):1575-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.08.070. View

15.

Millward A, Yaghi O . Metal-organic frameworks with exceptionally high capacity for storage of carbon dioxide at room temperature. J Am Chem Soc. 2005; 127(51):17998-9. DOI: 10.1021/ja0570032. View

16.

Herm Z, Swisher J, Smit B, Krishna R, Long J . Metal-organic frameworks as adsorbents for hydrogen purification and precombustion carbon dioxide capture. J Am Chem Soc. 2011; 133(15):5664-7. DOI: 10.1021/ja111411q. View

17.

Bourrelly S, Llewellyn P, Serre C, Millange F, Loiseau T, Ferey G . Different adsorption behaviors of methane and carbon dioxide in the isotypic nanoporous metal terephthalates MIL-53 and MIL-47. J Am Chem Soc. 2005; 127(39):13519-21. DOI: 10.1021/ja054668v. View

18.

Salles F, Maurin G, Serre C, Llewellyn P, Knofel C, Choi H . Multistep N2 breathing in the metal-organic framework co(1,4-benzenedipyrazolate). J Am Chem Soc. 2010; 132(39):13782-8. DOI: 10.1021/ja104357r. View

19.

Furukawa H, Ko N, Go Y, Aratani N, Choi S, Choi E . Ultrahigh porosity in metal-organic frameworks. Science. 2010; 329(5990):424-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.1192160. View

20.

Murray L, Dinca M, Yano J, Chavan S, Bordiga S, Brown C . Highly-selective and reversible O2 binding in Cr3(1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylate)2. J Am Chem Soc. 2010; 132(23):7856-7. DOI: 10.1021/ja1027925. View